On Friday 11 July 2008, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The only issue I can think of, is that users using kpowersave have to be
> in group powerdev (same problem applies to gnome-power-manager).
Presumably a blurb in NEWS is in order if klaptopdaemon is to be dropped and
replaced.
signature.asc
Descrip
Ana Guerrero wrote:
Ana
PS: Michael, i have cc'ed you in case you have something interesting to say
wrt kpowerposave.
Obviously, as kpowersave maintainer, I would welcome the change to
kpowersave. It were the limitations in klaptopdaemon, which originally
made me to package kpowersave. I'v
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:38:42AM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 10 July 2008 09:27:03 Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> > Question after reading your mail is: what kernel version will be in Lenny?
> > 2.6.24 or 2.4.25?
>
> .25 is fallback. .26 is the kernel teams planed kernel.
>
.26?
On Thursday 10 July 2008 09:27:03 Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Question after reading your mail is: what kernel version will be in Lenny?
> 2.6.24 or 2.4.25?
.25 is fallback. .26 is the kernel teams planed kernel.
For even more details for the interested reader, see -release maillist.
/Sune
--
Do
Hi
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 01:21:32AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> As you may know there have been some bugs that end up to be reported
> against
> klaptopdaemon(3.5.9), IMO the main one is this: [1] which derived in [2] that
> in turns come from [3].
>
> In summar
Hello All:
As you may know there have been some bugs that end up to be reported against
klaptopdaemon(3.5.9), IMO the main one is this: [1] which derived in [2] that
in turns come from [3].
In summary, klaptopdaemon rely on some methods to check ac presence and
battery status which have
