Hi Debian KDE,
Most of the discussion also applies to Debian, I've been requested to
ask you as well.
Note that I created a branch called "qapt+appstream". Maybe somebody
can give it a go. If you don't want to fix PackageKit, that is.
Regards,
Aleix
-- Forwarded message --
From:
2015-11-23 17:59 GMT+01:00 Aleix Pol :
> Hi Debian KDE,
> Most of the discussion also applies to Debian, I've been requested to
> ask you as well.
>
> Note that I created a branch called "qapt+appstream". Maybe somebody
> can give it a go. If you don't want to fix PackageKit, that is.
...if PK nee
On Monday, November 23, 2015 06:03:54 PM Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2015-11-23 17:59 GMT+01:00 Aleix Pol :
> > Hi Debian KDE,
> > Most of the discussion also applies to Debian, I've been requested to
> > ask you as well.
> >
> > Note that I created a branch called "qapt+appstream". Maybe somebody
>
Hi
> For Debian, I'd like to know what we need to do to get Qapt + Appstream
> working.
Any particular reason why we shouldn't use packagekit + appstream?
Cheers
Rohan Garg
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
On Monday, November 23, 2015 06:26:49 PM Rohan Garg wrote:
> Hi
>
> > For Debian, I'd like to know what we need to do to get Qapt + Appstream
> > working.
>
> Any particular reason why we shouldn't use packagekit + appstream?
All the work I've done with Muon so far is with the QApt backend. Per
