In data lunedì 21 novembre 2016 08:20:06 CET, Harald Sitter ha scritto:
> I was wondering why the syntax-highlighting repo grew a 'k' prefix?
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/frameworks/ksyntax-highlighting.git/
https://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2016/11/msg00459.html
--
Pino Tos
but the repo names follow upstream naming not source naming (attica
vs. attica-kf5 etc.) :/
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data lunedì 21 novembre 2016 08:20:06 CET, Harald Sitter ha scritto:
>> I was wondering why the syntax-highlighting repo grew a 'k' prefix?
>>
>> h
¡Hola Harald!
El 2016-11-21 a las 09:25 +0100, Harald Sitter escribió:
but the repo names follow upstream naming not source naming (attica
vs. attica-kf5 etc.) :/
Upstream also mentioned that they were going to rename it, but then they
only renamed the content of the tarball. When I renamed t
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Maximiliano Curia
wrote:
> ¡Hola Harald!
>
> El 2016-11-21 a las 09:25 +0100, Harald Sitter escribió:
>>
>> but the repo names follow upstream naming not source naming (attica vs.
>> attica-kf5 etc.) :/
>
>
> Upstream also mentioned that they were going to rename
