On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:16:26PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Hi everyone! I would like to discuss the current situation for Qt4's Webkit
> in
> Stretch.
>
> Let me first start with some facts:
>
> = Facts =
>
> - Both Qt4 and (b
Hi Sandro!
On Sunday 24 January 2016 03:22:47 Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal
> > opinion: even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at
> > least from testing.
>
> I can understand your option and also think
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:43:59PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal opinion:
> even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at least from
> testing.
Removing it is probably best way forward f
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:43:59PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal opinion:
> even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at least from
> testing.
That's what I think we should do, too.
--
Hey,
> And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal opinion:
> even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at least from
> testing.
I can understand your option and also think this is okay, but I would like to
get a exception for kdepim/kdepim-runtime.
Ma
And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal opinion:
even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at least from
testing.
Why? Well, I have been the only one uploading qt4's webkit since 02 Sep 2014,
and suffering it's hardware build requirements and it's
On Friday, January 22, 2016 05:24:41 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On Friday 22 January 2016 17:16:26 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote: [snip]
>
> > Does anyone has a better idea?
>
> Not necesarily better, but an idea after all:
>
> (partialremove) check which pack
On Friday 22 January 2016 17:16:26 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
[snip]
> Does anyone has a better idea?
Not necesarily better, but an idea after all:
(partialremove) check which packages use qt4's webkit for web browsing and
only remove those from testing.
--
Lisandro Damián Nic
Hi everyone! I would like to discuss the current situation for Qt4's Webkit in
Stretch.
Let me first start with some facts:
= Facts =
- Both Qt4 and (by inclusion) Qt4's webkit are no longer supported upstream.
- If a security bug appears in Qt4 during Stretch's lifetime I&#x
