Re: syntax-highlighting repo
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > ¡Hola Harald! > > El 2016-11-21 a las 09:25 +0100, Harald Sitter escribió: >> >> but the repo names follow upstream naming not source naming (attica vs. >> attica-kf5 etc.) :/ > > > Upstream also mentioned that they were going to rename it, but then they > only renamed the content of the tarball. When I renamed the git repository I > created a symlink so syntax-highlighting.git should still be working. Is > this causing any issues to you? We do not replicate symlinks into neon for reasons I cannot recall ^^. At any rate only a minor annoyance. > For me, it makes no difference if we call it syntax-highlighting.git or > ksyntax-highlighting.git, I fine having the repo called > syntax-highlighting.git and make ksyntax-highlighting.git a symlink to it. For consistency's sake I will re-rename unless someone objects before Friday Nov 25. Cheers, HS -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: syntax-highlighting repo
¡Hola Harald! El 2016-11-21 a las 09:25 +0100, Harald Sitter escribió: but the repo names follow upstream naming not source naming (attica vs. attica-kf5 etc.) :/ Upstream also mentioned that they were going to rename it, but then they only renamed the content of the tarball. When I renamed the git repository I created a symlink so syntax-highlighting.git should still be working. Is this causing any issues to you? For me, it makes no difference if we call it syntax-highlighting.git or ksyntax-highlighting.git, I fine having the repo called syntax-highlighting.git and make ksyntax-highlighting.git a symlink to it. Happy hacking, -- "C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off." -- Bjarne Stroustrup Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: syntax-highlighting repo
but the repo names follow upstream naming not source naming (attica vs. attica-kf5 etc.) :/ On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > In data lunedì 21 novembre 2016 08:20:06 CET, Harald Sitter ha scritto: >> I was wondering why the syntax-highlighting repo grew a 'k' prefix? >> >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/frameworks/ksyntax-highlighting.git/ > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2016/11/msg00459.html > > -- > Pino Toscano > -- > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: syntax-highlighting repo
In data lunedì 21 novembre 2016 08:20:06 CET, Harald Sitter ha scritto: > I was wondering why the syntax-highlighting repo grew a 'k' prefix? > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/frameworks/ksyntax-highlighting.git/ https://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2016/11/msg00459.html -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
syntax-highlighting repo
Hola I was wondering why the syntax-highlighting repo grew a 'k' prefix? https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/frameworks/ksyntax-highlighting.git/ HS -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
