Re: [Pkg-meego-maintainers] Packaging the MeeGo stack on Debian - Use the name ?

2010-12-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
kage name) where we are required to do so, that is, in libraries like libmeegotouch. From my reading this is consistent with the trademark policy and it clearly shows that it is not meego. Furthermore, if MeeGo is an open project and the MeeGo trademark owned by LF, why is Nokia handled diffe

Re: [Pkg-meego-maintainers] [MeeGo-dev] Packaging the MeeGo stack on Debian - Use the name ?

2010-12-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fr, 2010-12-10 at 06:56 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 12/10/2010 4:38 AM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > On Fr, 2010-12-10 at 11:24 +, MJ Ray wrote: > >> Ibrahim Haddad wrote: > >>> We would ask you to move away from using {M,m}-e-e-{G,g}-o or any subset

Re: [Pkg-meego-maintainers] Packaging the MeeGo stack on Debian - Use the name ?

2011-01-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
and as long as nobody wants to sue you, everything is fine). I don't know why OdyX decided to do this, there was no prior discussion of this, and I never supported this, and I am sure most of the others did not support this either. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See h