Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#751984: devscripts: mk-origtargz do not handle xpi files correctly

2015-12-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Just for the record, I did not understand why 2 sites are listed in the watch file of mozilla-noscript. Anyway: version=4 opts=uversionmangle=s/([^\.\d]+)/\~$1/ \ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/ \ https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/file/\d+/noscript_securit

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#751984: devscripts: mk-origtargz do not handle xpi files correctly

2015-12-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, I commited :-) On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:47:38AM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Le 14/11/2015 10:34, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > > As I see xpi-repack code, it does not do much. Why not use standard zip > > repackage and standard orig.tar.gz changes path. What is the issue by > > packaging this w

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#751984: devscripts: mk-origtargz do not handle xpi files correctly

2015-11-14 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:47:38AM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Le 14/11/2015 10:34, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > > As I see xpi-repack code, it does not do much. Why not use standard zip > > repackage and standard orig.tar.gz changes path. What is the issue by > > packaging this way. > > xpi-rep

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#751984: devscripts: mk-origtargz do not handle xpi files correctly

2015-11-14 Thread David Prévot
Le 14/11/2015 10:34, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > As I see xpi-repack code, it does not do much. Why not use standard zip > repackage and standard orig.tar.gz changes path. What is the issue by > packaging this way. xpi-repack also extracts the content of any .jar file inside the .xpi, so is would be