Hi IOhannes,
2015-05-09 21:56 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at:
On 05/09/2015 04:34 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
It might have ended in some spam filter, at least I suspect that's the
reason the mail didn't make it to the list.
most mailman mailinglists do not like it,
Hi IOhannes,
On 09.05.2015 21:56, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 05/09/2015 04:34 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
It might have ended in some spam filter, at least I suspect that's the
reason the mail didn't make it to the list.
most mailman mailinglists do not like it, if you have tons of CCs
2015-05-09 22:22 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi IOhannes,
2015-05-09 21:56 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at:
On 05/09/2015 04:34 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
It might have ended in some spam filter, at least I suspect that's the
reason the mail
Hi,
Admittedly seems there is more activity on FFmpeg's than libav's side.
It does not necessarily reflect into higher quality though - plus,
libav is not dead at all as they're still releasing new versions and
providing support and fixes for a number of stable branches.
I'm personally getting
Hi Alessio,
On 09.05.2015 11:19, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Admittedly seems there is more activity on FFmpeg's than libav's side.
It does not necessarily reflect into higher quality though - plus,
But it certainly means that FFmpeg has more features.
libav is not dead at all as they're still
On 05/09/2015 12:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to
FFmpeg in Debian
where did you get that impression from?
btw, i find your email a bit too suggestive.
gmsrd
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
FYI: The status of the libdiscid source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.6.1-3
Current version: 0.6.1-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
It seemed like a clear consensus, since no further discussion happened.
I hadn't expected that Reinhard was unaware of the discussion.
Alright, let me fix this then by changing my mind on the subject (and
Hi Felipe,
On 09.05.2015 15:55, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 9 May 2015 at 10:36, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
It seemed like a clear consensus, since no further discussion happened.
I think there cannot possibly be either consensus or disagreement
since only the
On 9 May 2015 at 11:03, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Felipe,
On 09.05.2015 15:55, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 9 May 2015 at 10:36, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
It seemed like a clear consensus, since no further discussion happened.
Hi Felipe,
On 09.05.2015 16:13, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 9 May 2015 at 11:03, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Felipe,
On 09.05.2015 15:55, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 9 May 2015 at 10:36, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
It seemed like a
On 2015-05-09 11:19, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Hi,
Admittedly seems there is more activity on FFmpeg's than libav's side.
It does not necessarily reflect into higher quality though - plus,
libav is not dead at all as they're still releasing new versions and
providing support and fixes for a number
On 05/09/2015 02:46 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Hi IOhannes,
On 09.05.2015 14:29, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 05/09/2015 12:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to
FFmpeg in Debian
where did you get that
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to
FFmpeg in Debian
where did you get that impression from?
Very interesting question as it's pretty in clear view that *there is
no
Hi IOhannes,
On 09.05.2015 14:29, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 05/09/2015 12:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to
FFmpeg in Debian
where did you get that impression from?
From the recent discussion in this list:
yoshimi_1.3.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yoshimi_1.3.4-2.dsc
yoshimi_1.3.4-2.debian.tar.xz
yoshimi_1.3.4-2_amd64.deb
yoshimi-data_1.3.4-2_all.deb
yoshimi-dbg_1.3.4-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 20:02:58 +0200
Source: yoshimi
Binary: yoshimi yoshimi-data yoshimi-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.3.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
On 05/09/2015 04:34 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
It might have ended in some spam filter, at least I suspect that's the
reason the mail didn't make it to the list.
most mailman mailinglists do not like it, if you have tons of CCs in the
mail (after all, mailinglists are there to prevent that
18 matches
Mail list logo
