Processing of x265_1.9-3_amd64.changes

x265_1.9-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: x265_1.9-3.dsc x265_1.9-3.debian.tar.xz libx265-doc_1.9-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___

Processing of juce_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.changes

juce_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: juce_4.1.0+repack-1.dsc juce_4.1.0+repack.orig.tar.gz juce_4.1.0+repack-1.debian.tar.xz introjucer-dbgsym_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.deb introjucer_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.deb

juce_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:introjucer is NEW. binary:juce-modules-source is NEW. binary:libjuce-dev is NEW. binary:libjuce-doc is NEW. binary:libjuce0 is NEW. source:juce is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it

juce_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Maintainer request. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Processing of juce_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.changes

juce_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: juce_4.1.0+repack-1.dsc juce_4.1.0+repack.orig.tar.gz juce_4.1.0+repack-1.debian.tar.xz juce-modules-source_4.1.0+repack-1_all.deb juce-utils-dbgsym_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.deb

Re: preparing new RtMidi release, question about SO version

On 02/10/2016 06:21 PM, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > Previous versions have made the error of treating SO version like the > version number, and producing binaries e.g. librtmidi.so.2.1.0. > > I was recommending changing this to properly reflect ABI > compatibility. What would Debian maintainers

Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi (see #796550)

Hi Hanno On 2016-02-11 17:03:04, Hanno Zulla wrote: > I believe to have fixed all issues you have listed in your review. nocheck[1] is not honored. You'll need something like the following: override_dh_auto_test: ifeq (,$(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) # run the tests here endif

Bug#814374: Acknowledgement (aeolus: Segmentation fault on startup)

Some additional info. Since the bug seems related to libfreetype, I tried to downgrade libfreetype6 to stable (2.5.2-3+deb8u1). It made aeolus work again. However I'm not sure whether the bug is in libfreetype6 or in the way aeolus uses it. pgpf994lfKrQ5.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital

Processed: Re: Bug#813497: closed by Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> (reply to bal...@balintreczey.hu) (Re: Bug#813497: kodi: Segfault on Startup)

Processing control commands: > fixed -1 15.2+dfsg1-3 Bug #813497 {Done: Bálint Réczey } [kodi] kodi: Segfault on StartUp Marked as fixed in versions kodi/15.2+dfsg1-3. -- 813497: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813497 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#813497: closed by Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> (reply to bal...@balintreczey.hu) (Re: Bug#813497: kodi: Segfault on Startup)

Control: fixed -1 15.2+dfsg1-3 2016-02-11 1:53 GMT+01:00 Alessio Treglia : > Please close again this bug by specifying the version it is no longer > reproducible. Most probably it was current version. Please change it if that's not the case. Cheers, Balint

x265_1.9-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:31:40 +0100 Source: x265 Binary: x265 libx265-dev libx265-79 libx265-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.9-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#813497: closed by Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> (reply to bal...@balintreczey.hu) (Re: Bug#813497: kodi: Segfault on Startup)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 813497 15.2+dfsg1-3 Bug #813497 {Done: Bálint Réczey } [kodi] kodi: Segfault on StartUp No longer marked as found in versions kodi/15.2+dfsg1-3. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi (see #796550)

Hello Sebastian, thanks for the review. I believe to have fixed all issues you have listed in your review. Except one: > I: sonic-pi: spelling-error-in-binary Those are not spelling errors, lintian is spellchecking the translated non-English document resources here, which are linked into the

Bug#814011: yoshimi: FTBFS with gcc-6: multiple errors

The current 'master' has bugfixes that should clear these. However I haven't issued a bugfix release as we will probably release V 1.3.9 long before GCC 6 becomes a done-deal, and I don't want to create unnecessary churn. -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I

Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi (see #796550)

I had a look at the package in git, and in general it look good. I missed some hints in the debian/changelog file about why the version is a repack, and where details on the packaging can be found (ie a reference to debian/README.source). The changelog is one of the first things I check, at

juce_4.1.0+repack-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:juce-modules-source is NEW. binary:juce-utils is NEW. binary:libjuce-dev is NEW. binary:libjuce-doc is NEW. binary:libjuce0 is NEW. source:juce is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it