Re: inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"

On 09/29/2015 06:58 PM, Jeff Epler wrote: > As a consequence of the second item, I believe LinuxSampler is not > distributable at all alessio brought to my attention that the license of LinuxSampler was already discussed on debian-legal 10 years ago, and it seems that they came to a similar conclu

Re: inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"

hi, thanks for the quick reply. On 09/29/2015 06:58 PM, Jeff Epler wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:14:11PM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > wrote: >> i'm currently thinking about packaging "linuxsampler", which has a >> somewhat abominable l

inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"

i'm currently thinking about packaging "linuxsampler", which has a somewhat abominable license, which they call "GPL with commercial exception" [1]. however, it is unclear whether this license allows us to distribute the software in "non-free", or whether the contradictory nature renders the entir

linuxsampler?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 i was wondering why we don't package "linuxsampler". it pops up in several "suggests" (e.g. it's frontend "qsampler", or the "multimedia-samplers" task) it apparently is non-free, but is this the only reason? (i searched the net, but couldn't find a

Bug#773246: hydrogen-drumkits: DFSG-ness of the drumkits

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: tags -1 pending thanks i've uploaded hydrogen-drumkits_2015.09.28-1 to unstable (currently lingering in NEW), which has re-evaluated the licenses for all included drumkits (and dropped the drumkits of dubious license/provenience). the new

Bug#800022: ardour3: Last upgrade removed Ardour4

On 09/25/2015 03:55 PM, Massimo Barbieri wrote: > Package: ardour3 > Version: 1:3.5.403~dfsg-4 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > last upgrade of my Debian testing removed ardour4 and now I have ardour3. > > Thanks for your work. that's rather by intention: the "ardour3" package sh

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-21 10:54, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>>> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a >>>> crasher bug (#778363) triggered by loading any M

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi, On 2015-09-22 12:26, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote: > Hi all, > > Reading at this discussion, I'd just want to mention that dispite > this package is called "hydrogen-drumkits", it does install other > stuffs as well, demo songs in circumstances.

Fwd: Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:42:00 +0300 From: Artemiy Pavlov To: "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" Hi again :-) “just pick any and don't bother me no more” LOL :-) This is the option I would pic

Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)

On 09/21/2015 04:29 PM, Artemiy Pavlov wrote: > Hi again! > > Here is the list of kits that I can share via any license you like: > > - VariBreaks > - HardElectro > - Electric Empire > - HipHop-1 > - HipHop-2 > - EasternHop > - Synthie-1 > thanks for the kind offer. even though you allow use t

Fwd: Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)

I can share via any license you like: - - VariBreaks - - HardElectro - - Electric Empire - - HipHop-1 - - HipHop-2 - - EasternHop - - Synthie-1 Artemiy. Sent from my iPad > On 21 Sep 2015, at 5:14 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > wrote: > >> On 2015-09-21 15:47, Artemiy Pa

licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-21 15:47, Artemiy Pavlov wrote: > Hi there! > > Some of the sounds in these drum kits were created by me, and some > were taken from a collection of drum machine samples that one of my > friends allowed to use. I can grant you any license

Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

On 2015-09-21 14:54, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Please go ahead. I do not know when I will have time to look at this, > so do not wait on me. afaik, sramacher has expressed his intention to take care of stk "tonight" (sent ~5 mins after simons mail) to take care of STK. so you might want to wait

Re: Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-21 14:54, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Please go ahead. I do not know when I will have time to look at > this, so do not wait on me. > afaict, sramacher has expressed his intention to take care of stk "tonight" (sent ~5 mins after simons m

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

On 2015-09-14 23:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi Alessio, Jonas, others > > I jumped in to updating hydrogen-drumkits package ... I updated it and > realize that it is really huge! :( ... About 250MB > I think something so big doesn't make sense distribute in debian. > > What we should do with it?

question regarding license of hydrogen drumkits

"hydrogen-drumkits" for the Debian/GNU linux distribution (as part of the "pkg-multimedia-maintainers", CCed). Debian as a project is committed to deliver "free" (as in speech) software and data to our users. whenever you install something from Debian, you can be s

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug >>> (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be >>> raised to "important"). >> >> I would remove it. i'd like to hear adrian on this first. > > What shou

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-17 10:34, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > So what we need now is to tune get-orig-source script to get only > DFSG compatible drumkits? Can we also get copyright file in in orig > tar ball? the main problem i see here, is that the license fields a

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: > > So here's the suggestion. Instead of > >ardour -> a2 >ardour3 -> a3 >ardour4 -> a4 > > I propose > >ardour -> a4 >ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie) >drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) ) > now tha

Bug#692201: ardour: Segfaults when using the freezing regions

unable to reproduce this problem with ardour_1:4.2~dfsg-2 can you confirm that the problem has been fixed? gfmasrd IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lis

Bug#778363: ardour3: Segfault when importing a midi file

i can reproduce the problem. attached you can find a backtrace. however: the segfault seems to have gone in ardour-4 (as provided by the "ardour" package). i don't think fixing the problem is worth it, esp. since the "ardour3" package will be removed from the archives in the (near?) future. gfm

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

On 2015-09-15 10:15, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-09-15 9:46 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard : >> If you mean encourage upstream to offer out-of-band download and then >> _not_ package those drumkits for Debian to "safe packager's load" then I >> find that a very bad idea: Our users should be able to use

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

On 2015-09-15 00:20, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Yes but latest debian release from 2007 30MB now in 2015 250MB I > am assuming that size still can rise in future. Also I believe that > usually user using just couple of favorite drumkits and not need > all of of them maybe. So I am thinking to safe user

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-14 05:55, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-09-13 22:38 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig > : >> On 09/13/2015 08:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >>> i'm also just building ardour, and if everything goes well >>> will (re-build and) upload it to uns

Bug#798341: [inkscape] impossible to install inkscape

On 2015-09-09 14:46, Marco Righi wrote: > The problem is not resolved (the test are below). > > Regarding the hybrid configuration, I think it is a problem > because there not exists the last version of a library but your are > branching them so my Linux "lives" using some library from a branch >

Bug#760758: amb-plugins: spurious LADSPA_PROPERTY_REALTIME

On 09/09/2015 06:40 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any progress with this topic? Does any body contacted Richard Furse > as has been suggested? i have now. http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2015-September/036096.html gcmsr IOhannes signature.asc Descrip

Bug#798341: [inkscape] impossible to install inkscape

On 2015-09-09 09:52, Marco Righi wrote: [...] > inkscape : Depends: libatkmm-1.6-1 (>= 2.22.1) but it is not going to > be installed in the past few weeks, Debian has seen a major transition (of the core components for any C++-related software in Debian) that affected *many* packages and included

Re: pd-tclpd_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 08/27/2015 07:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi IOhannes, > > please add the missing license of tclpd-0.3.0\examples\colorpicker.tcl > to your debian/copyright. thanks for catching that. re-uploaded with the fixed debian/copyright. gfmards IOhannes signature.asc Description: Open

lives: Depending on plugins? Suggesting with archs?

hi, i wonder why lives has a *hard* dependency on frei0r-plugins. will it refuse work if that set of plugins (that are dlopen()ed) are not present on the system? i would like to move it to 'Recommends', to allow for more flexibility for installations. i also wonder why there is an arch-specifica

Re: Comments regarding pd-iemguts_0.1-1_amd64.changes

On 08/22/2015 11:36 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi, > > LICENSE.txt says it is GPL-2+ but the file header say it is only GPL-2. > Is this intentional? > i talked with upstream and they say that this is not intentional but rather an oversight, and that they indeed intend the license to be GPL-

Re: [SCM] x42-plugins/master: Exclude mipsel from build.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-18 15:43, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >> a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is >> parallelized (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5). could that somehow >> be causing the problem? > > x42-plugins not having parallel build enable

Re: [SCM] x42-plugins/master: Exclude mipsel from build.

On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >> 2015-06-09 15:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler : >> >>> Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package. >>> I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42 build again when the >>> issue

Re: Fwd: Introducing myself - Joël Krähemann

On 06/12/2015 03:27 PM, Joël Krähemann wrote: > > I've already done my first package for sure it needs to improved but this > is it basically: > > http://gsequencer.org/packages/ags_0.4.2-1_amd64.deb > running "lintian" on that packages gives 2 errors and 8 warnings, all of which should be fixe

multimedia-blends: policy question(s)

hi, esp ross, i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain. should i just go ahead and commit them, or does this require some discussion? furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends* r

Re: Introducing myself - Joël Krähemann

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi, great! welcome. On 2015-06-11 13:14, Joël Krähemann wrote: > have created an alioth account > . - that is very nice ;-) would you mind sharing your user name, so we can actually add your digital

Re: giada - looper ready for upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-10 14:03, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-06-10 13:44 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > : >> On 2015-06-10 13:08, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >>> giada is simple but powerful looper. Package is ready by my >

Re: giada - looper ready for upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-10 13:08, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi all, > > giada is simple but powerful looper. Package is ready by my opinion > ;) Is there any DD who is willing review it and if ok than upload. would you mind to document the dfsg-repackaging in READ

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-09 06:35, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas > Cadhalpun: >> So one can just use two directories, first run configure in both >> (with the different options), then compile

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

On 2015-06-02 14:26, Tino Mettler wrote: > >> would you like to fix them at the alioth repository? > > Hi, > > Done. cool, thanks. > Now lintian --pedantic linuxptp_1.5-1_amd64.changes only shows 2 > warnings that I can't do anything about > (debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature and no-upst

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

cts/pkg-multimedia/ On 2015-05-27 16:19, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote: >> How will maintainership within the debian-multimedia team work? >> Where will the git repository be hosted? I already have a guest >> account for col

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote: > I hope you are ok withe the current state of the package. so lintian stil gives me one error and a couple of informational warnings. the error *must* be fixed before we can upload it, the informational tags should be fixed (and are really mostly no-braine

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote: > How will maintainership within the debian-multimedia team work? > Where will the git repository be hosted? I already have a guest > account for collab-maint on git.debian.org. the place for our git packages

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-27 09:49, Tino Mettler wrote: > I prepared a new repository. cool. >> - as this package has never been in debian before, you can trim >> the debian/changelog to a bare minimum (that is: a single section >> for "1.5-1" [sic!]) > > Done.

Re: multiple uploaders

instead? mfgasdr IOhannes On 2014-11-08 14:53, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" wrote: > due to a few recent mails [1], i was wondering how much we (would > like to) enforce our ">2 uploaders per package" rule. > > i know of at least one package i maintain under

Fwd: Bug#786422: ITP: pd-iemtab -- Pd-objects for table manipulation

anyone interested in becoming an uploader for that one? packaging uses CDBS. i expect upstream to not release very often. fmgadsr IOhannes Forwarded Message Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: IOhannes m zmoelnig * Package name: pd-iemtab Version : 1.20 U

Fwd: RM: flumotion -- ROM; unmaintained upstream; depends on obsolete gstreamer0.10

just to let you know that i requested a package removal for 'flumotion'. gfmsadr IOhannes Forwarded Message Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal flumotion uses gstreamer0.10 which is to be removed from Debian. I contacted upstream about their plans to support gstreamer1.0,

Re: Request to Join Project Debian Multimedia Maintainers from Fabian Greffrath (fabian)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-18 10:04, nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote: > > Joining with my fab...@debian.org account. > congratulations fabian, for becoming a DD! fgmsdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVWakBAAoJELZQGcR/ej

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-17 22:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I use bleeding edge tools for some of my own work. And I use > FFmpeg for some of that. But I will continue to use bleeding edge > tools for that work - which renders it irrelevant for judging what > i

Re: qxgedit 2nd uploader needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-13 12:19, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi all, > > I am nearly ready with qtgedit packaging ... now searching for 2nd > uploader ;) Than I can upload it to our repo. Anybody interested? > so where have you put the package? i don't see it in o

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On 05/09/2015 12:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to > FFmpeg in Debian where did you get that impression from? btw, i find your email a bit too suggestive. gmsrd IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

Re: review/upload calf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-06 10:24, Aurelien Martin wrote: > I have packaged on oldstable, so I inherit of old packaging tools > I'll upgrade my main laptop during this week to jessie and > afterward to sid FYI: The package has been tested a another sid box > with

Re: review/upload calf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-05 20:48, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> W: calf source: newer-standards-version 3.9.6 (current is >>> 3.9.4) >>> > Which version of lintian you are running? Seems to be outdated. nah. lintian is recent enough, but the debian policy standards

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Import upstream version 3.6.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-03 18:29, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On 3 May 2015 at 09:04, Julian Wollrath wrote: >> I am terribly sorry for that big e-mail, I forgot to exclude >> this patch from git-send-email. > > Thanks for sharing your work. However

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-04-29 23:48, Bálint Réczey wrote: > I disagree with the question and I in my eyes both of the > libraries should be allowed to enter testing. That would be fair > handling of maintainers' and upstreams' work. /me would vote for inclusion of

packaging: python-soundfile

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi all, i would like to package python-soundfile [1], a python audio processing library wrapping libsndfile. i would prefer to do this under our team umbrella, so if anybody is interested please speak up. fgmasfrt IOhannes [1] https://github.com/

Re: Granting write access to all DDs to our git area

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-04-13 11:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2015-04-13 09:30:54) >> I think it makes a difference if we blindly trust fellow DDs or >> probably random newcomers with unchecked identities. > > That's a valid point. yes.

Bug#781095: pd-unauthorized: format list of contents and other small fixes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: tags -1 confirmed pending thanks On 2015-03-24 13:58, Daniele Forsi wrote: > Package: pd-unauthorized Severity: minor Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > the list of objects contained in this package is reflown (as per > the policy) and

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-02-19 14:46, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> I just saw that there is git-pq which seems to work similar. > > I'm not sure how gitpkg does the patch thing, but do note that gbp > pq branches are not meant to be published: the export format are

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

(oops, forgot to include tino, who might not be subscribed to p-m-m; sorry for the noise) On 02/17/2015 07:50 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> As for DDs: ales...@debian.org or umlae...@debian.org, we have even more >> in the multimedia team. > > I am happy to upload, but I cannot commit to reviewing

Bug#768295: pd-osc-1.0-2 is outdated and buggy

Control: retitle -1 bug with depth > 1 OSC address Control: tags -1 confirmed thanks On 11/06/2014 11:28 AM, Antoine Villeret wrote: > When parsing OSC path with more than one slash ('/'), the float is not > understood by a number box. to be precise, [routeOSC] will output a message with the rema

multiple uploaders

due to a few recent mails [1], i was wondering how much we (would like to) enforce our ">2 uploaders per package" rule. i know of at least one package i maintain under the hood of pkg-multimedia-maintainers, which has only a single uploader (me, obviously). soundscaperenderer is anybody inter

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

On 10/07/2014 12:06 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2014, 11:53 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: >> even if done after so long time and mean that project has been >> revived? > > IMHO Yes. With packaging the new release, we -- as Debian -- have merely > done what is expected from

Bug#672352: gmerlin doesn't start with segfault

On 2014-09-15 12:28, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > hi, > > thanks for the additional info. > > >> Versions of packages gmerlin recommends: pn gmerlin-encoders >> pn gmerlin-plugins-avdecoder pn >> gmerlin-plugins-base > > does the pro

Bug#672352: gmerlin doesn't start with segfault

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi, thanks for the additional info. > > Versions of packages gmerlin recommends: pn gmerlin-encoders > pn gmerlin-plugins-avdecoder pn > gmerlin-plugins-base does the problem go away if you install any (or all) of these recommended pa

Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-07-29 03:20, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> if they are not drop in replacements, and it would also be a >> pain if >>> higher up packages link-in both ffmpeg & libav and some >>> clashing symbols are present... > This is why the new ffmpeg will use

Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 personally i would welcome if both libav and ffmpeg could co-exist within Debian¹. as i see it, libav and ffmpeg have diverged, and as such i would like to have the choice which one to use. On 2014-07-28 11:55, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jul 28, Ales

Re: Sponsorship/Review for package "karlyriceditor"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-05-26 17:46, forum::für::umläute wrote: > with that i meant a repository hosted on debian infrastructure. > most packaging repositories are hosted on alioth [1]. many alioth > packaging teams such as pkg-multimedia (and to a lesser extent >

Bug#583787: src:frei0r: Some files are LGPL 2.1

Control: tags -1 pending,fixed-in-experimental Control: owner -1 umlae...@debian.org thanks for the report. while packaging frei0r-1.4 we have updated debian/copyright to DEP5 and have now a (hopefully) accurate picture of the various licenses and copyrights used. frei0r_1.4-1 is now in experimen

sharing code between packages

hi, i'm seeking advice about how to deal with the following situation: we are currently maintaining an application-package ("puredata" for those interested), brought to use by upstream1. now "some people" (upstream2, unrelated to upstream1) have turned the application into a library ("libpd"), by

Re: Sponsorship/Review for package "karlyriceditor"

On 05/19/2014 07:19 PM, Martin Steghöfer wrote: > Just to bring this to your attention once more before moving on to other > places in order to find a reviewer or sponsor. It would be very nice, if > someone could have a look! here at least a review: your Vcs: cool that you are using git. but you

Re: soundscaperenderer_0.4.1~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 05/08/2014 01:57 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 May 2014, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" wrote: >> if so, i would re-upload the package with the fixed debian/copyright. > > ok, so please go on. ok, thanks; uploaded. fgmards IOhannes sig

Re: soundscaperenderer_0.4.1~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 05/02/2014 03:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Dear Maintainer, > > unfortunately I have to reject your package. > > Please add the missing BOOST license of > ssr-0.4.1\apf\unit_tests\catch\catch.hpp > to your debian/copyright. > In addition ssr-0.4.1\data\MacOSX\dylibbundler\src\* is GP

Re: RFS: xvidcore_1.3.3-1

On 04/22/2014 09:55 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Dear team, > > I have prepared xvidcore (2:1.3.3-1) in GIT, please upload: > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/xvidcore.git > pushed standards version, removed dm-upload-allowed field and uploaded. thanks for the work. gfmdsar

real name (was: Re: Looking for "libde265" package review / sponsor)

On 03/31/2014 12:19 PM, forum::für::umläute wrote: > hi, argh, i did it again. sorry to not use my real name in the "From:" header. but i finally found the "Correct Identity" plugin for icedove, which should get my "From" address correctly for debian related emails. fgmards IOhannes signatur

<    1   2   3