On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: > > So here's the suggestion. Instead of > > ardour -> a2 > ardour3 -> a3 > ardour4 -> a4 > > I propose > > ardour -> a4 > ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie) > drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) ) >
now that both ardour (4.2) and ardour3 (back to 3.5.403) are uploaded to unstable, i wonder about that last line: shouldn't we drop ardour3 asap? right now? probably adding another transitional package (for stretch). i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be raised to "important"). ghmsdf IOhannes _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
