Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-20 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 21:39:41 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Short status update: > > all three relevant (source) packages have been uploaded now: > > - jack-audio-connection-kit > - jackd2 > - jackd-defaults > > The transition can be started by processing them from new. I'd suggest > to

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-17 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Short status update: all three relevant (source) packages have been uploaded now: - jack-audio-connection-kit - jackd2 - jackd-defaults The transition can be started by processing them from new. I'd suggest to process these three packages in a batch. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler,

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-14 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > From a quick look, the only potential issue with the j-a-c-k upload > > itself I can see is that it build-depends on python; however, as it > > doesn't produce any python modules and only appears to have a runtime > > dependency

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, June 14, 2010 06:49, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 16:57:52 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 18:39 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>> This creates the situation that we actually partially revert the last >>> transition. However, we still conside

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:14:22 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, June 14, 2010 06:49, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 16:57:52 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 18:39 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: This creates the situation that we actual

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-13 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 16:57:52 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 18:39 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> This creates the situation that we actually partially revert the last >> transition. However, we still consider jackd2 as the superior >> implementation for squeeze, so

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-06 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:12, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> My idea was to have the j-a-c-k (jackd2) package provide the non-virtual >> package libjack0, just like today.  I didn't think it was important >> which libjack implementation apps build against, and this seemed the >> easiest / least disrup

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:26:38 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:43:33 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: >> >> > Your proposal talked about introducing a libjack-jackd2-0 and a >> > libjack0-0

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-06 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Reinhard, On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:43:33 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Your proposal talked about introducing a libjack-jackd2-0 and a > > libjack0-0.118+svn3796 package, AIUI. I don't understand why the > > current lib

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On So, Jun 06, 2010 at 00:15:54 (CEST), Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 16:09:53 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 15:36, Julien Cristau wrote: >> > So I have a few questions about this plan: >> > - if all implementations of libjack are binary-compatible, th

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 16:09:53 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 15:36, Julien Cristau wrote: > > So I have a few questions about this plan: > > - if all implementations of libjack are binary-compatible, then why do > >  we need to change the package name when changing imple

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-05 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 15:36, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 18:39:11 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> The last transition switched the jack-audio-connection-kit package >> from 'jackd' to 'jackd2'. 'jackd2' is a complete reimplementation of >> jackd in C++ with SMP support. Mo

Re: Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-06-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 18:39:11 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > The last transition switched the jack-audio-connection-kit package > from 'jackd' to 'jackd2'. 'jackd2' is a complete reimplementation of > jackd in C++ with SMP support. Most importantly however, is an added > feature that improves

Bug#583916: Upcoming jack transition

2010-05-31 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: release.debian.org Dear Release Team, We, the pkg-multimedia team, would like to announce our intent to start a (new) jack transition. This includes a new upload of the package 'jack-audio-connection-kit', which provides the packages "libjack0" and "libjack-dev". Details follow: There