Hi,
On 28/01/18 14:16, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> Le 2018-01-28 14:38, Simon McVittie a écrit :
>> Source: flowcanvas
>> Severity: important
>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: proposed-removal
>> Control: clone -1 -2
>> Control: reassign
Le 2018-01-28 14:38, Simon McVittie a écrit :
Source: flowcanvas
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ladish
Control: retitle -2 ladish: should this package be removed?
flowcanvas depends on numerous obsolete
FYI: The status of the ladish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1+dfsg0-5.1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #885094: ladish: Depends on old GNOME libraries
The
ladish 1+dfsg0-5.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-01-21
It is affected by these RC bugs:
885094: ladish: Depends on old GNOME libraries
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
ladish 1+dfsg0-5.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-01-21
It is affected by these RC bugs:
885094: ladish: Depends on old GNOME libraries
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Source: ladish
Version: 1+dfsg0-5.1
Severity: serious
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: oldlibs libgnomecanvas libglade
Tags: sid buster
X-Debbugs-CC: ales...@debian.org
As announced [1], we do not intend to release Debian 10 "Buster" with
the old libgnome (a
FYI: The status of the ladish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1+dfsg0-5
Current version: 1+dfsg0-5.1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
arl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
diffstat for ladish-1+dfsg0 ladish-1+dfsg0
changelog |8
patches/arm64-hppa-sparc64-no-stacktrace.patch | 15 +++
patches/series |1 +
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff
Your message dated Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:04:39 +
with message-id <e1cq4tn-0005kk...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#762016: fixed in ladish 1+dfsg0-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #762016,
regarding ladish FTBFS on parisc architecture, patch attached
to be marked a
Package: ladish
Version: 1+dfsg0-5
Tags: patch
ladish fails to build in the code where it tries to generate a stack-backtrace.
The attached patch fixes it like most other architectures by just disabling
the stacktrace on hppa (parisc).
Please apply the attached patch for next upload.
By the way
While you're at it, could you add defined(__aarch64__) to that test
so that it will build on arm64?
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
FYI: The status of the ladish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1+dfsg0-4
Current version: 1+dfsg0-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Package: ladish
Version: 1+dfsg0-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Usertags: hppa
ladish fails to build on hppa, as can be seen here:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ladisharch=hppaver=1%2Bdfsg0-5stamp=1410978484
The attached patch fixes it by just removing the hppa arch
ladish 1+dfsg0-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-08-29
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
754951: flowcanvas: flowcanvas fails to build with graphviz 2.3x
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia
Package: ladish
Version: 1+dfsg0-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
When I stop and start my studio (with gladish), I would like ladish to restore
my window
locations.
I run alsaplayer, a compressor, two
FYI: The status of the ladish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1+dfsg0-3
Current version: 1+dfsg0-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jun 2013 23:48:01 +
with message-id e1uji0h-pr...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#701440: fixed in ladish 1+dfsg0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #701440,
regarding ladish: ftbfs with eglibc-2.17
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
max_fds;
^
Waf: Leaving directory `/«BUILDDIR»/ladish-1+dfsg0/build'
Build failed
- task failed (exit status 1):
{task 40852560: c loader.c - loader.c.1.o}
['/usr/bin/gcc', '-fvisibility=hidden', '-Wall', '-g', '-O0',
'-I/«BUILDDIR»/ladish-1+dfsg0/build', '-I/usr/include
FYI: The status of the ladish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.3-10
Current version: 1+dfsg0-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the ladish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.3-9
Current version: 0.3-10
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:47:13 +
with message-id e1r3jfz-0001vw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#641452: fixed in ladish 0.3-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #641452,
regarding ladish packages libalsapid.so out of PATH, breaking ALSA MIDI apps in
rooms
to be marked
Package: ladish
Version: 0.3-9ubuntu0danmppa2~lucid1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
ladish from Sid installs libalsapid.so into /usr/lib/ladish, away from
/usr/lib where ladish assumes it to be. As a result ladish cannot preload
this library when executing apps, and some ALSA MIDI ports do
FYI: The status of the ladish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.3-7
Current version: 0.3-9
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:48:21 +
with message-id e1qyfx3-0006lf...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#639490: fixed in ladish 0.3-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #639490,
regarding ladish: fixed patch for kfreebsd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
tags 639490 pending
thanks
Hi all,
fix committed, see commit #3f02ab4.
Thanks for the effort!
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 639490 pending
Bug #639490 [src:ladish] ladish: fixed patch for kfreebsd
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
639490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639490
Your message dated Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:47:49 +
with message-id e1qxfut-0006qa...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#639054: fixed in ladish 0.3-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #639054,
regarding ladish: FTBFS: /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdktypes.h:55:23: fatal
error: gdkconfig.h
Package: src:ladish
Version: 0.3-8
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Tags: patch
Hi!
I noticed you added a patch intended to fix building on
kfreebsd. However it needs a minor correction. Updated patch
below.
--- ladish.orig/alsapid/helper.c
+++ ladish/alsapid
2011/8/27 Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org:
--- ladish.orig/alsapid/helper.c
+++ ladish/alsapid/helper.c
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@
#include stdlib.h /* atoll */
#include unistd.h
#include sys/types.h
+#ifdef __linux__
#include linux/limits.h
+#else
+#include sys/syslimits.h
Source: ladish
Version: 0.3-7
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110822 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
On 05/30/2011 10:33 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Hi!
Once flowcanvas joined sid, I'll move ladish from experimental to unstable.
Regards,
Is that also the reason why patchage is in experimental?
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/patchage
\r
On 06/02/2011 04:05 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 05/30/2011 10:33 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Hi!
Once flowcanvas joined sid, I'll move ladish from experimental to
unstable.
Regards,
Is that also the reason why patchage is in experimental?
http://packages.debian.org/experimental
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:17 PM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
And why Ingen is not in Debian but in alioth git? :)
Because it is not released yet and David asked me to upload it only
once a first version ready for a wide audience was out.
--
Alessio Treglia |
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:05 PM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that also the reason why patchage is in experimental?
Yes, it depends on the new release of raul, which will hit unstable soon.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer
Hi!
Once flowcanvas joined sid, I'll move ladish from experimental to unstable.
Regards,
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
Hi,
Ladish is still in experimental, is that on purpose?
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/ladish
Regards,
\r
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2011 07:32:13 +
with message-id e1qom69-00066i...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#626664: fixed in ladish 0.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #626664,
regarding ladish: use x-terminal-emulator not xterm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: ladish
Version: 0.3-4ubuntu0danmppa1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
ladish defaults to using xterm as a a terminal emulator (which may not even
be installed). In Debian, it's best to use x-terminal-emulator, which
reflects the user's choice.
-- System Information:
Debian Release
Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2011 11:32:18 +
with message-id e1qku7u-0002rq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#626481: fixed in ladish 0.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #626481,
regarding ladish: can't use rxvt / others as terminal emulators, shell not
respected
to be marked
On 11-04-06 at 08:23am, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
+License: BSD-3-clause
[snip]
+ THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AS IS AND ANY EXPRESS OR
That is not exactly the BSD-3-clause license, as it does not us the
original wording of PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard j...@debian.org wrote:
That is not exactly the BSD-3-clause license, as it does not us the
original wording of PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS.
I recommend to rename to BSD-3-clause~author to indicate its relation to
the official
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:50:37AM +, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Spec update
diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright
index e57a2b4..11a4b91 100644
--- a/debian/copyright
+++ b/debian/copyright
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Format:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:44:13AM +, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Needs libjack-jackd2-dev (= 1.9.6~dfsg.1-5)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 8af2f59..e235207 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Priority: optional
Maintainer:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Beware that DEP5 have been maintained in multiple VCSes - luckily (to my
knowledge) only one of each kind (Subversion, Bazaar). so it is IMO best to
mention explicitly which kind used if mentioning revision number.
Ok,
strongly recommend to document that. At least in the commit message but
preferrably also e.g. in debian/README.source as well.
From jackd2's debian/changelog:
jackd2 (1.9.6~dfsg.1-5) experimental; urgency=low
* Add no-self-connect patch to provide better ladish support.
-- Adrian
-connect patch to provide better ladish support.
-- Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:00:05 +0100
BTW, I'll document this somewhere.
Thanks.
Still unclear to me, however, if this means ladish _must_ use only
jackd2 from now on, or it is a JACK feature which jackd2
Hi,
I see that Laditools and Ladish are packaged for Debian. Great work, thanks.
What are we going to support? Apps who has official added a patch for
Ladi (Rosegarden)? Apps which there are patches for, but are not
supported officially (Ardour)?
My feeling is that it is not wise to support
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:49:58PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
I see that Laditools and Ladish are packaged for Debian. Great work,
thanks.
What are we going to support? Apps who has official added a patch for
Ladi (Rosegarden)? Apps which there are patches
Hey guys,
I've been using ardour+ladish all this time along (even ardour+vst+ladish
too),
and there are nothing new/special/whatever about it.
If you look at the patch, the only thing it does is add a timer that checks
for kill signals, and if it isSIGUSR1, save the project.
I think it doesnt
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:35:03PM +, Filipe Lopes wrote:
Hey guys,
Hi!
If you look at the patch, the only thing it does is add a timer that checks
for kill signals, and if it isSIGUSR1, save the project.
I saw the patch, and IIRC, it's really safe to include it. No idea if it
would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org
* Package name: ladish
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Nedko Arnaudov ne...@arnaudov.name
* URL : http://ladish.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : session
Hi,
Some time back there was a little discussion about packaging Ladish or
not (www.ladish.org). Ladish is a Linux audio session manager, which
stores projects, launched apps, jack connections etc.
At this time pretty some apps have Ladish support or will have it in the
next release, for example
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:47:19PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Some time back there was a little discussion about packaging Ladish or
not (www.ladish.org). Ladish is a Linux audio session manager, which
stores projects, launched apps, jack connections etc.
Why isn't it in debian yet
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 01:46:18PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:47:19PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Some time back there was a little discussion about packaging Ladish
or not (www.ladish.org). Ladish is a Linux audio session manager,
which stores projects
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
1) Package ladish but release it only for experimental
ACK
2) For packages supporting ladish, enable it if available at build time
ACK
3) Build ladish-supporting packages for experimental
ACK
--
Alessio Treglia
55 matches
Mail list logo
