Re: [pk...@debian.org: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?]

2010-03-23 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi! Do we want to complete a transition for squeeze? I remember something about libjack0.100. I guess it's also time to decide whether we want jackd2 in squeeze or not. The discussion on this topic sort of died out. Should

Re: [pk...@debian.org: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?]

2010-03-23 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:48, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi! Do we want to complete a transition for squeeze? I remember something about libjack0.100. I guess it's also time to decide whether we want jackd2 in

Processing of sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2010-03-23 Thread Archive Administrator
sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.dsc sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg.orig.tar.gz sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.diff.gz sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Re: [SCM] sooperlooper packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.6.14-1-4-ge6ba187

2010-03-23 Thread Alessio Treglia
Hi Jonas, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Please generally use the more modern tilde ~ instead of dot ., as it makes room for later corrected upstream release (e.g. in cases of licensing problems not in core code but in some contrib folder, where it makes

sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-03-23 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.diff.gz to main/s/sooperlooper/sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.diff.gz sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.dsc to main/s/sooperlooper/sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.dsc sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.deb to main/s/sooperlooper/sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

Re: [SCM] sooperlooper packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.6.14-1-4-ge6ba187

2010-03-23 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Please post to the list rather than privately.  I took the liberty of posting this response to the list (hope you don't mind). Usually I send my replies to the recipient address and add the list to the CC field. But no

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-23 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--== On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator instal...@ftp-master.debian.org said: AA Reject Reasons: AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2) I can sponsor this upload to

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-03-23 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === bristol: = Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 This might need manual action from your side. See

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote: Hi, |--== On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator instal...@ftp-master.debian.org said: AA Reject Reasons: AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-23 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:30:56PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: AA Reject Reasons: AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2) I can sponsor this upload to experimental. However I'm wondering if we