Re: [pk...@debian.org: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?]
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi! Do we want to complete a transition for squeeze? I remember something about libjack0.100. I guess it's also time to decide whether we want jackd2 in squeeze or not. The discussion on this topic sort of died out. Should we try and make a decision on this? -edrz ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [pk...@debian.org: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?]
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:48, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi! Do we want to complete a transition for squeeze? I remember something about libjack0.100. I guess it's also time to decide whether we want jackd2 in squeeze or not. The discussion on this topic sort of died out. Should we try and make a decision on this? I think the jack experts should make the call here. I'm nowhere near knowledgeable enough to make a suggestion. Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.dsc sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg.orig.tar.gz sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.diff.gz sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] sooperlooper packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.6.14-1-4-ge6ba187
Hi Jonas, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Please generally use the more modern tilde ~ instead of dot ., as it makes room for later corrected upstream release (e.g. in cases of licensing problems not in core code but in some contrib folder, where it makes sense to re-release using exact same upstream version number). just read now this mail, anyway lintian warned about that, so my choice was to replace the dot . with the plus +. Is it correct? Please let me know if I made any mistake... -- Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.diff.gz to main/s/sooperlooper/sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.diff.gz sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.dsc to main/s/sooperlooper/sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.dsc sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.deb to main/s/sooperlooper/sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.deb sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg.orig.tar.gz to main/s/sooperlooper/sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1.dsc - source sound sooperlooper_1.6.14+dfsg-1_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] sooperlooper packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.6.14-1-4-ge6ba187
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Please post to the list rather than privately. I took the liberty of posting this response to the list (hope you don't mind). Usually I send my replies to the recipient address and add the list to the CC field. But no problem, I will send them to the list only. Plus and tilde are both modern - but where tilde means just below then plus means just above. Yes, I know and... So what I recommend for this specific case - and which is not too late - is to add a comment at the place(s) where you added that plus about then switching from the correct plus the the more elegant tilde. ...agree, so I will replace the plus with the ~ tilde for the next releases. Thank you! -- Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hi, |--== On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator instal...@ftp-master.debian.org said: AA Reject Reasons: AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2) I can sponsor this upload to experimental. However I'm wondering if we should rather upload 1.9.4+svn3842-2 to unstable at this point. Ciao, Free ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Possible problems in your Debian packages
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === bristol: = Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 This might need manual action from your side. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=bristol = No migration to testing for 79 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=bristol === hydrogen: = 1 Release Critical bug(s): - #574719 http://bugs.debian.org/574719 hydrogen: FTBFS: Song.h:27:19: error: QString: No such file = Missing build(s) on alpha hppa kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mipsel sparc This might need manual action from your side. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hydrogen = No migration to testing for 35 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=hydrogen === jack-audio-connection-kit: = No migration to testing for 67 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=jack-audio-connection-kit === libffado: = No migration to testing for 20 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libffado === liblo: = No migration to testing for 21 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=liblo === mplayer: = 2 Release Critical bug(s): - #524805 http://bugs.debian.org/524805 mplayer: CVE-2009-0385 integer signedness error - #568272 http://bugs.debian.org/568272 mplayer: Overwrites configuration file it generated itself === nekobee: = No migration to testing for 77 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=nekobee === qtractor: = No migration to testing for 66 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=qtractor === vlc: = 1 Release Critical bug(s): - #570749 http://bugs.debian.org/570749 vlc-data: file conflict with Lenny version of vlc = Missing build(s) on alpha This might need manual action from your side. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vlc === Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS: audacity 1.3.12rc1-beta (Debian: 1.3.11-2) bristol 0.50.3 (Debian: 0.40.8-1) clalsadrv 2.0.0 (Debian: 1.2.2-2) ffprobe 53 (Debian: 0.svn92-1) kmidimon 0.7.2 (Debian: 0.7.1-1) liblivemedia 2010.03.16 (Debian: 2010.02.10-1) mhwaveedit 1.4.18 (Debian: 1.4.15-2) smplayer 0.6.9 (Debian: 0.6.8-2) === Packages with lintian errors and warnings: - bristol (0 errors, 1 warnings) http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#bristol - ffprobe (0 errors, 1 warnings) http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#ffprobe - jack-audio-connection-kit (0 errors, 6 warnings) http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#jack-audio-connection-kit - liblivemedia (0 errors, 21 warnings) http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#liblivemedia - liblo (0 errors, 2 warnings) http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#liblo - mhwaveedit (0 errors, 5 warnings) http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#mhwaveedit - mplayer (0 errors, 7 warnings) http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#mplayer - nekobee (0 errors, 3 warnings) http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#nekobee interesting stuff probably ends here We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't actually problems), please reply to it and let us know. If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of the mail: - unsubscribe email You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this won't remove your PTS subscription. - ignore package email You will no longer receive information about that package in those mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't receive anything. - ignore bug email You will no longer receive information about this bug. All commands are manually processed, but you will receive confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely what you want. A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO. See: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful information. -- DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum
Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote: Hi, |--== On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator instal...@ftp-master.debian.org said: AA Reject Reasons: AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2) I can sponsor this upload to experimental. However I'm wondering if we should rather upload 1.9.4+svn3842-2 to unstable at this point. there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now... -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:30:56PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: AA Reject Reasons: AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2) I can sponsor this upload to experimental. However I'm wondering if we should rather upload 1.9.4+svn3842-2 to unstable at this point. Why 1.9.4+something and not 1.9.5? I'd like to sort out the config file issue (dpkg vs. ucf), but we could probably upload d2c23abd119cdf7f40654fa443e2a51cf6265893, that is, before I touched the (re-)generation of audio.conf We currently only have one version of this file shipped to the user, so we're talking about one MD5 sum and a second one for our new version if we lower the rt-priority from 99 to 95. This seems a good idea to me, because there's no need for highest rt prios, they should be left to watchdogs which will kill rt processes if they hook up all cpu time. Though modern kernels never grant all cpu time to rt kernels anymore, it's just not necessary to run audio stuff at rtprio 95. jackd usually runs at 10. Cheerio -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver NTSC: Never the same colour ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
