Processed: bug 625798 is forwarded to https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3298177
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 625798 https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3298177 Bug #625798 [qtractor] qtractor: Track names with slashes cause MIDI recording to silently fail Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3298177'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625798 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: tagging 625798
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625798 + upstream Bug #625798 [qtractor] qtractor: Track names with slashes cause MIDI recording to silently fail Added tag(s) upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625798 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: tagging 625798
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625798 + fixed-upstream Bug #625798 [qtractor] qtractor: Track names with slashes cause MIDI recording to silently fail Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625798 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#625798: [ qtractor-Bugs-3298177 ] Track names with slashes cause MIDI recording to fail
Thanks! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
[no subject]
I am Mrs Linda Kingsley a loan lender if you are in need of loan contact me via email; lindaloanfi...@gmail.com for more info___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of a52dec_0.7.4-16_amd64.changes
a52dec_0.7.4-16_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: a52dec_0.7.4-16.dsc a52dec_0.7.4-16.diff.gz liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
a52dec_0.7.4-16_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: a52dec_0.7.4-16.diff.gz to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-16.diff.gz a52dec_0.7.4-16.dsc to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-16.dsc liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: a52dec_0.7.4-16.dsc - source devel liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb - optional libdevel liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 621145 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#621145: marked as done (a52dec: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 10:32:09 + with message-id e1qiikp-qo...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#621145: fixed in a52dec 0.7.4-16 has caused the Debian Bug report #621145, regarding a52dec: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 621145: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621145 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: a52dec Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. a52dec appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once a52dec is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: a52dec Source-Version: 0.7.4-16 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of a52dec, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: a52dec_0.7.4-16.diff.gz to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-16.diff.gz a52dec_0.7.4-16.dsc to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-16.dsc liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-16_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 621...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org (supplier of updated a52dec package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 12:20:03 +0200 Source: a52dec Binary: liba52-0.7.4 liba52-0.7.4-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.7.4-16 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org Description: liba52-0.7.4 - library for decoding ATSC A/52 streams liba52-0.7.4-dev - library for decoding ATSC A/52 streams (development) Closes: 621145 Changes: a52dec (0.7.4-16) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. . [ Alessio Treglia ] * Get rid of unneded *.la files (Closes: #621145). * Add debian/source/format, set packaging format to 1.0. * debian/control: - Correct team's name. - Bump Standards. * Update debian/copyright to the latest DEP-5 SVN rev.174. . [ Fabian Greffrath ] * Remove myself from uploaders. Checksums-Sha1: 31a20c2120f8404bf4d9fd5f1adba8d5f0d2f9d0 1367 a52dec_0.7.4-16.dsc 41178b337628c728445a5505876525f15cf7d06d 5865 a52dec_0.7.4-16.diff.gz 34dbe31e7f34572d887c0a706b31abd8b4a87cb7 34492
Bug#554926: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)
Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2011 12:39:52 +0200 with message-id banlktikxvtegl-wanks9z2mn4-mrob4...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Closing bugs #554926 #615735 has caused the Debian Bug report #554926, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 554926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554926 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: jack-tools Version: 0.0.2-6 Severity: minor User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: no-add-needed Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your executables. More informations can be found at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking /bin/bash ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -O3 -funroll-loops -Wall -o jack.plumbing jack.plumbing.o -ljack libtool: link: gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -O3 -funroll-loops -Wall -o jack.plumbing jack.plumbing.o -ljack /usr/bin/ld: jack.plumbing.o: in function on_reorder:jack.plumbing.c:341: error: undefined reference to 'sem_post' /usr/bin/ld: jack.plumbing.o: in function start_plumber:jack.plumbing.c:355: error: undefined reference to 'sem_init' /usr/bin/ld: jack.plumbing.o: in function start_plumber:jack.plumbing.c:361: error: undefined reference to 'pthread_create' /usr/bin/ld: jack.plumbing.o: in function start_plumber:jack.plumbing.c:362: error: undefined reference to 'pthread_join' /usr/bin/ld: jack.plumbing.o: in function do_plumbing:jack.plumbing.c:307: error: undefined reference to 'sem_wait' /usr/bin/ld: jack.plumbing.o: in function on_registration:jack.plumbing.c:334: error: undefined reference to 'sem_post' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [jack.plumbing] Error 1 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 20101210-1 Closing bugs #554926 and #615735 since they were solved with 20101210-1. Thanks. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: bug 624898 is forwarded to https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3298221
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 624898 https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3298221 Bug #624898 [src:projectm] projectm: FTBFS: actor_projectM.cpp:212:9: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'VisPalette*' [-fpermissive] Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3298221'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 624898: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624898 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#615735: marked as done (jack-tools: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed)
Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2011 12:39:52 +0200 with message-id banlktikxvtegl-wanks9z2mn4-mrob4...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Closing bugs #554926 #615735 has caused the Debian Bug report #615735, regarding jack-tools: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 615735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615735 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: jack-tools Version: 0.0.2-7 Severity: important Tags: sid User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: no-add-needed The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with ld --no-add-needed. For details, please see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/02/msg00011.html http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking Ubuntu might have a patch for this issue, but unfortunately it was not forwarded to Debian. Please have a look at http://packages.qa.debian.org/jack-tools to see if an Ubuntu version for this package exists, and if a fix is included in the Ubuntu diff. [...] /lib64/libm.so.6: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [jack.clock] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/user-jack-tools_0.0.2-7-amd64-3B9Vfq/jack-tools-0.0.2/sw29' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user-jack-tools_0.0.2-7-amd64-3B9Vfq/jack-tools-0.0.2/sw29' Adding cdbs dependencies to debian/jack-tools.substvars dh_installdirs -pjack-tools dh_installdocs -pjack-tools dh_installexamples -pjack-tools dh_installman -pjack-tools dh_installinfo -pjack-tools dh_installmenu -pjack-tools dh_installcron -pjack-tools dh_installinit -pjack-tools dh_installdebconf -pjack-tools dh_installemacsen -pjack-tools dh_installcatalogs -pjack-tools dh_installpam -pjack-tools dh_installlogrotate -pjack-tools dh_installlogcheck -pjack-tools dh_installchangelogs -pjack-tools dh_installudev -pjack-tools dh_lintian -pjack-tools dh_bugfiles -pjack-tools dh_install -pjack-tools cp: cannot stat `./sw04/jack.plumbing': No such file or directory dh_install: cp -a ./sw04/jack.plumbing debian/jack-tools/usr/bin/ returned exit code 1 make: *** [binary-install/jack-tools] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 20101210-1 Closing bugs #554926 and #615735 since they were solved with 20101210-1. Thanks. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: tagging 624898
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 624898 + pending Bug #624898 [src:projectm] projectm: FTBFS: actor_projectM.cpp:212:9: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'VisPalette*' [-fpermissive] Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 624898: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624898 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: libprojectm-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb libprojectm-qt-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-qt-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb libprojectm-qt1_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-qt1_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb libprojectm2_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libprojectm2_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb libvisual-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libvisual-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb projectm-data_2.0.1+dfsg-8_all.deb to main/p/projectm/projectm-data_2.0.1+dfsg-8_all.deb projectm-dbg_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/projectm-dbg_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb projectm-jack_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/projectm-jack_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb projectm-pulseaudio_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/projectm-pulseaudio_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.debian.tar.gz to main/p/projectm/projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.debian.tar.gz projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.dsc to main/p/projectm/projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.dsc Override entries for your package: libprojectm-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libprojectm-qt-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libprojectm-qt1_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb - optional libs libprojectm2_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb - optional libs libvisual-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb - optional sound projectm-data_2.0.1+dfsg-8_all.deb - optional libs projectm-dbg_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb - extra debug projectm-jack_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb - optional sound projectm-pulseaudio_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb - optional sound projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.dsc - source sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 624898 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#624898: marked as done (projectm: FTBFS: actor_projectM.cpp:212:9: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'VisPalette*' [-fpermissive])
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 13:04:32 + with message-id e1qikhs-0002dg...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#624898: fixed in projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #624898, regarding projectm: FTBFS: actor_projectM.cpp:212:9: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'VisPalette*' [-fpermissive] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 624898: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624898 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: projectm Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-7 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110502 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7-amd64-cMIlBq/projectm-2.0.1+dfsg/src/build' /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /build/user-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7-amd64-cMIlBq/projectm-2.0.1+dfsg/src/build/CMakeFiles 99 [ 94%] Building CXX object projectM-libvisual/CMakeFiles/projectM_libvisual.dir/actor_projectM.o cd /build/user-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7-amd64-cMIlBq/projectm-2.0.1+dfsg/src/build/projectM-libvisual /usr/bin/c++ -DprojectM_libvisual_EXPORTS -DLINUX -DLINUX -g -O2 -fPIC -I/build/user-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7-amd64-cMIlBq/projectm-2.0.1+dfsg/src/libprojectM -I/usr/include/libvisual-0.4 -I/usr/include/SDL -DPROJECTM_PREFIX='/usr' -o CMakeFiles/projectM_libvisual.dir/actor_projectM.o -c /build/user-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7-amd64-cMIlBq/projectm-2.0.1+dfsg/src/projectM-libvisual/actor_projectM.cpp /build/user-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7-amd64-cMIlBq/projectm-2.0.1+dfsg/src/projectM-libvisual/actor_projectM.cpp: In function 'VisPalette* lv_projectm_palette(VisPluginData*)': /build/user-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7-amd64-cMIlBq/projectm-2.0.1+dfsg/src/projectM-libvisual/actor_projectM.cpp:212:9: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'VisPalette*' [-fpermissive] make[3]: *** [projectM-libvisual/CMakeFiles/projectM_libvisual.dir/actor_projectM.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/05/02/projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: projectm Source-Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of projectm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libprojectm-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb libprojectm-qt-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-qt-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb libprojectm-qt1_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-qt1_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb libprojectm2_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libprojectm2_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb libvisual-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/libvisual-projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb projectm-data_2.0.1+dfsg-8_all.deb to main/p/projectm/projectm-data_2.0.1+dfsg-8_all.deb projectm-dbg_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/projectm-dbg_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb projectm-jack_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/projectm-jack_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb projectm-pulseaudio_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb to main/p/projectm/projectm-pulseaudio_2.0.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.debian.tar.gz to main/p/projectm/projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.debian.tar.gz projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.dsc to main/p/projectm/projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-8.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 624...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org (supplier of updated projectm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP
Re: [SCM] projectm/master: Add patch to fix FTBFS with GCC4.6 (Closes: #624898, LP: #771045).
On Fri, 6 May 2011 13:33:21 +0200, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org
wrote:
Hi Matthias,
[...]
+ src/projectM-libvisual/actor_projectM.cpp | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- projectm.orig/src/projectM-libvisual/actor_projectM.cpp
projectm/src/projectM-libvisual/actor_projectM.cpp
+@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ extern C int lv_projectm_events (VisPl
+ * we aren't with projectm, so just ignore :) */
+ extern C VisPalette *lv_projectm_palette (VisPluginData *plugin)
+ {
+- return NULL;
++ return (VisPalette *) NULL;
+ }
+
+ /* This is where the real rendering happens! This function is what we
call, many times
the above patch makes projectm build fine with GCC4.6 in sid.
Your review would be appreciated, let me know what you think.
Looks excellent, thanks! (Applied it upstream too)
I didn't know how to fix this, and I still find it very strange... Why do
GCC need a cast of a NULL pointer?
Anyway, I think we should upload this soon, I only want to take a second
look at bug #621789 before.
Cheers,
Matthias
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: LAME LGPL Modifications
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Andres Mejia mcita...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Mark Taylor m...@mp3dev.org wrote: Hi Andres, I'd be happy to just delete this text from the README. Not sure if my sourceforge account will still work. It would be quicker one of the other developers was willing to remove this text? Hence I'm forwarding to lame-...@lists.sf.net. Mark Ok. Thank you very much! Also, I'm going to assume I can remove this text from the README in the tarballs for any of the releases from LAME. Before I rush to this, let me say that I hope nobody minds if I remove this text from the tarball of LAME that will be redistributed (hopefully) in Debian. Of course if anyone has objections, feel free to raise them. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:50 AM, cer...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hello, I'm sorry to bother you. I'm sure you have already been contacted with regards to LAME and the modifications you made to its license over 10 years ago. There's a possibility that LAME can be redistributed alongside Debian (despite the patent issues with LAME) if a certain issue is resolved. This issue is with regards to the modifications you introduced in the README file. The modifications are repeated below. This code is distributed under the GNU LESSER PUBLIC LICENSE (LGPL, see www.gnu.org) with the following modification: 1. If you determine that distribution of LAME requires a patent license, and you obtain a patent license, you may distribute LAME even though redistribution of LAME may also require a patent license. 2. You agree not to enforce any patent claims for any aspect of MPEG audio compression, or any other techniques contained in the LAME source code. The issue is mainly with the second modification which contradicts the terms of the LGPL which states. You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. This contradiction makes LAME undistributable (see [1] and [2]). I have sent a message to the Free Software Foundation and the Software Freedom Law Center in regards to this issue (see [3]). So far I haven't received a response from either of them. I have received a response from one of the current LAME developers however (I had CC'd the lame-dev mailing list). Since the time these extra restrictions were introduced, no other file was updated to add these restrictions. Thus there is confusion as to whether LAME is still licensed solely under LGPL or if these modifications to the LGPL which are stated in the README file also apply. The current LAME developers would like to remove those extra restrictions if they knew for sure that those restrictions only applied to the README or at least any file that doesn't contain any licensing information. Since you were the only person to introduce these changes, this is why I am sending you this lengthy message via sourceforge.net's messaging system. If you agree to have these modifications to the LGPL dropped for LAME, could you send a message to the current LAME developers allowing them to drop the modifications? You could also send me a message and I will route the message to them (I am not a LAME developer). Regards, Andres Mejia Email: mcita...@gmail.com 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/08/msg00049.html 2. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2011-April/017869.html 3. https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=201105030019.30226.mcitadel%40gmail.comforum_name=lame-dev -- This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user, by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site. This message has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias. You may reply to this message using the Reply feature of your email client, or using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at: https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=1387939 Again, thank you very much. :-) -- Regards, Andres Mejia -- Regards, Andres Mejia ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
[PATCH] lame --license output change
Hello again,
Here's hopefully one more thing that should be fixed. It's an output
change from what's printed when using 'lame --license'. The patch is
attached which applies to the latest release of LAME (not CVS).
This is just a suggested change. LAME could still be redistributed
as-is I believe. However, I think it's best not to give legal
interpretations of the LGPL and instead simply give the generic LGPL
header information.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
Description: Patch to simply print LGPL licence header when using lame --license
--- lame-3.98.4.orig/frontend/parse.c
+++ lame-3.98.4/frontend/parse.c
@@ -531,39 +531,25 @@ print_license(FILE * const fp)
{ /* print version license */
lame_version_print(fp);
fprintf(fp,
-Can I use LAME in my commercial program?\n
+Copyright (c) 1999-2011 by The LAME Project\n
+Copyright (c) 1999,2000,2001 by Mark Taylor\n
+Copyright (c) 1998 by Michael Cheng\n
+Copyright (c) 1995,1996,1997 by Michael Hipp: mpglib\n \n);
+fprintf(fp,
+This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or\n
+modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public\n
+License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either\n
+version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.\n
\n
-Yes, you can, under the restrictions of the LGPL. In particular, you\n
-can include a compiled version of the LAME library (for example,\n
-lame.dll) with a commercial program. Some notable requirements of\n
-the LGPL:\n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-1. In your program, you cannot include any source code from LAME, with\n
- the exception of files whose only purpose is to describe the library\n
- interface (such as lame.h).\n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-2. Any modifications of LAME must be released under the LGPL.\n
- The LAME project (www.mp3dev.org) would appreciate being\n
- notified of any modifications.\n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-3. You must give prominent notice that your program is:\n
- A. using LAME (including version number)\n
- B. LAME is under the LGPL\n
- C. Provide a copy of the LGPL. (the file COPYING contains the LGPL)\n
- D. Provide a copy of LAME source, or a pointer where the LAME\n
- source can be obtained (such as www.mp3dev.org)\n
- An example of prominent notice would be an \About the LAME encoding engine\\n
- button in some pull down menu within the executable of your program.\n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-4. If you determine that distribution of LAME requires a patent license,\n
- you must obtain such license.\n \n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-*** IMPORTANT NOTE ***\n
+This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,\n
+but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of\n
+MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU\n
+Library General Public License for more details.\n
\n
-The decoding functions provided in LAME use the mpglib decoding engine which\n
-is under the GPL. They may not be used by any program not released under the\n
-GPL unless you obtain such permission from the MPG123 project (www.mpg123.de).\n
-\n);
+You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public\n
+License along with this program. If not, see\n
+http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.\n);
+
return 0;
}
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [PATCH] lame --license output change
On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote: +This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or\n +modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public\n +License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either\n +version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.\n \n There is no such thing as version 2 of the GNU Lesser General Public License. There is either GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 or GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1. The former is considered obsolete by the Free Software Foundation, and the latter is by the Free Software Foundation interpreted as a successor to the older _Library_ license even if differently named. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [PATCH] lame --license output change
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote: + This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or\n + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public\n + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either\n + version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.\n \n There is no such thing as version 2 of the GNU Lesser General Public License. There is either GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 or GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1. The former is considered obsolete by the Free Software Foundation, and the latter is by the Free Software Foundation interpreted as a successor to the older _Library_ license even if differently named. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private The copyright headers for the sources in LAME still say LGPL2.0. The patch simply reflects this. -- Regards, Andres Mejia ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [PATCH] lame --license output change
On 11-05-06 at 04:55pm, Andres Mejia wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote: + This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or\n + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public\n + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either\n + version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.\n \n There is no such thing as version 2 of the GNU Lesser General Public License. There is either GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 or GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1. The former is considered obsolete by the Free Software Foundation, and the latter is by the Free Software Foundation interpreted as a successor to the older _Library_ license even if differently named. The copyright headers for the sources in LAME still say LGPL2.0. The patch simply reflects this. I suspect you do not understand my point, then: LGPL2.0 == GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 LGPL2.0 != GNU Lesser General Public License version 2 You proposed the latter, which has 2 (two) flaws: a) Lesser instead of the correct Library, and b) 2 instead of the correct 2.0. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [PATCH] lame --license output change
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On 11-05-06 at 04:55pm, Andres Mejia wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote: + This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or\n + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public\n + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either\n + version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.\n \n There is no such thing as version 2 of the GNU Lesser General Public License. There is either GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 or GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1. The former is considered obsolete by the Free Software Foundation, and the latter is by the Free Software Foundation interpreted as a successor to the older _Library_ license even if differently named. The copyright headers for the sources in LAME still say LGPL2.0. The patch simply reflects this. I suspect you do not understand my point, then: LGPL2.0 == GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 LGPL2.0 != GNU Lesser General Public License version 2 You proposed the latter, which has 2 (two) flaws: a) Lesser instead of the correct Library, and b) 2 instead of the correct 2.0. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private Check frontend/parse.c. You'll see the header mentions the *Lesser* General Public License 2. The patch simply reflects that. -- Regards, Andres Mejia ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Lame-dev] [PATCH] lame --license output change
Humm, apparently, something in the way ate your patch and I didn't receive
it.
On May 06 2011, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
+ This library is free software; you can redistribute it
and/or\n
+ modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public\n
+ License as published by the Free Software Foundation;
either\n
+ version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later
version.\n
\n
There is no such thing as version 2 of the GNU Lesser General Public
License.
Right.
There is either GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 or GNU
Lesser General Public License version 2.1.
The former is considered obsolete by the Free Software Foundation, and
the latter is by the Free Software Foundation interpreted as a successor
to the older _Library_ license even if differently named.
Right again. Aside from naming/version, is there any change in content from
LGPL2.0 and LGPL2.1?
Too busy to check right now...
The copyright headers for the sources in LAME still say LGPL2.0. The patch
simply reflects this.
Indeed.
Regards,
--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC
http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Lame-dev] [PATCH] lame --license output change
On Friday 06 May 2011 5:50:59 pm Rogério Brito wrote:
Humm, apparently, something in the way ate your patch and I didn't receive
it.
Here it is again inline.
Description: Patch to simply print LGPL licence header when using lame --license
--- lame-3.98.4.orig/frontend/parse.c
+++ lame-3.98.4/frontend/parse.c
@@ -531,39 +531,25 @@ print_license(FILE * const fp)
{ /* print version license */
lame_version_print(fp);
fprintf(fp,
-Can I use LAME in my commercial program?\n
+Copyright (c) 1999-2011 by The LAME Project\n
+Copyright (c) 1999,2000,2001 by Mark Taylor\n
+Copyright (c) 1998 by Michael Cheng\n
+Copyright (c) 1995,1996,1997 by Michael Hipp: mpglib\n \n);
+fprintf(fp,
+This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or\n
+modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public\n
+License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either\n
+version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later
version.\n
\n
-Yes, you can, under the restrictions of the LGPL. In particular,
you\n
-can include a compiled version of the LAME library (for
example,\n
-lame.dll) with a commercial program. Some notable requirements
of\n
-the LGPL:\n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-1. In your program, you cannot include any source code from LAME,
with\n
- the exception of files whose only purpose is to describe the
library\n
- interface (such as lame.h).\n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-2. Any modifications of LAME must be released under the LGPL.\n
- The LAME project (www.mp3dev.org) would appreciate being\n
- notified of any modifications.\n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-3. You must give prominent notice that your program is:\n
- A. using LAME (including version number)\n
- B. LAME is under the LGPL\n
- C. Provide a copy of the LGPL. (the file COPYING contains
the LGPL)\n
- D. Provide a copy of LAME source, or a pointer where the
LAME\n
- source can be obtained (such as www.mp3dev.org)\n
- An example of prominent notice would be an \About the LAME
encoding engine\\n
- button in some pull down menu within the executable of your
program.\n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-4. If you determine that distribution of LAME requires a patent
license,\n
- you must obtain such license.\n \n \n);
-fprintf(fp,
-*** IMPORTANT NOTE ***\n
+This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,\n
+but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of\n
+MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU\n
+Library General Public License for more details.\n
\n
-The decoding functions provided in LAME use the mpglib decoding
engine which\n
-is under the GPL. They may not be used by any program not
released under the\n
-GPL unless you obtain such permission from the MPG123 project
(www.mpg123.de).\n
-\n);
+You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General
Public\n
+License along with this program. If not, see\n
+http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.\n);
+
return 0;
}
On May 06 2011, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
+This library is free software; you can redistribute it
and/or\n +modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser
General Public\n +License as published by the Free
Software Foundation; either\n +version 2 of the
License, or (at your option) any later version.\n \n
There is no such thing as version 2 of the GNU Lesser General Public
License.
Right.
There is either GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 or
GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1.
The former is considered obsolete by the Free Software Foundation, and
the latter is by the Free Software Foundation interpreted as a
successor to the older _Library_ license even if differently named.
Right again. Aside from naming/version, is there any change in content from
LGPL2.0 and LGPL2.1?
There's a long explanation of why it's now called Lesser instead of
Library GPL, a section 6b was added, and there were minor tweaks done to the
wording along with the naming/version changes.
Too busy to check right now...
The copyright headers for the sources in LAME still say LGPL2.0. The
patch simply reflects this.
Indeed.
Regards,
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
Helping with LAME Packaging
Hello Rogério, I'm sending this mail to you outside of lame-dev. If you want to help with Debian packaging, you should start by taking a look at [1]. Just so you know, it's not clear whether LAME will even be accepted in the Debian archives. You're more than welcome to help out anyway. -- Regards, Andres Mejia 1. http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Join ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [PATCH] lame --license output change
On 11-05-06 at 05:38pm, Andres Mejia wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: LGPL2.0 == GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 LGPL2.0 != GNU Lesser General Public License version 2 You proposed the latter, which has 2 (two) flaws: a) Lesser instead of the correct Library, and b) 2 instead of the correct 2.0. Check frontend/parse.c. You'll see the header mentions the *Lesser* General Public License 2. The patch simply reflects that. Thanks for clarifying. My comment still stand, however - now targeted upstream only, rather than both at upstream and you :-) Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#625927: audacious-plugins: Loading m3u leads to segfault
Package: audacious-plugins Version: 2.4.4-1 Severity: important Tags: patch The m3u loader segfaults when loading m3us, at least if the file doesn't end with a line break. Patch attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages audacious-plugins depends on: ii libasound2 1.0.23-3shared library for ALSA applicatio ii libatk1.0-0 2.0.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudcore1 2.4.4-1 audacious core engine library ii libavcodec52 5:0.6.2-0.1 library to encode decode multimedi ii libavformat525:0.6.2-0.1 ffmpeg file format library ii libavutil50 5:0.6.2-0.1 avutil shared libraries - runtime ii libbinio1ldbl1.4-14 Binary I/O stream class library ii libc62.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo21.10.2-6The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libcddb2 1.3.2-2 library to access CDDB data - runt ii libcdio-cdda00.81-4 library to read and control digita ii libcdio100.81-4 library to read and control CD-ROM ii libcue1 1.4.0-1 CUE Sheet Parser Library ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.21.6-1Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libdbus-1-3 1.4.6-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.92-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libfaad2 2.7-6 freeware Advanced Audio Decoder - ii libflac8 1.2.1-3 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim ii libfluidsynth1 1.1.3-3+b1 Real-time MIDI software synthesize ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2.2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.4.4-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.6.0-2 GCC support library ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.23.3-3GDK Pixbuf library ii libglib2.0-0 2.28.6-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.4-3The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libjack0 [libjack-0. 1:0.120.1+svn4142-1 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii liblircclient0 0.9.0~pre1-1infra-red remote control support - ii libmcs1 0.7.1-1.2 Abstraction library to store confi ii libmms0 0.6.2-2 MMS stream protocol library - shar ii libmowgli2 0.7.1-1 high performance development frame ii libmp3lame0 3.98.4-0.0 LAME Ain't an MP3 Encoder ii libmtp8 1.0.6-2 Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) libr ii libneon27-gnutls 0.29.5-3An HTTP and WebDAV client library ii libnotify4 0.7.1-2 sends desktop notifications to a n ii libogg0 1.2.0~dfsg-1Ogg bitstream library ii libpango1.0-01.28.3-6Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpulse00.9.21-4PulseAudio client libraries ii libresid-builder0c2a 2.1.1-8 SID chip emulation class based on ii libsamplerate0 0.1.7-3 Audio sample rate conversion libra ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.14-6.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libsidplay2 2.1.1-8 SID (MOS 6581) emulation library ii libsndfile1 1.0.24-1Library for reading/writing audio ii libstdc++6 4.6.0-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-17 userspace USB programming library ii libvorbis0a 1.3.2-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisenc21.3.2-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisfile3 1.3.2-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libwavpack1 4.60.1-1an audio codec (lossy and lossless ii libx11-6 2:1.4.3-1 X11 client-side library ii libxcomposite1 1:0.4.3-1 X11 Composite extension library ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2+b1 GNOME XML library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.6-1 X Rendering Extension client libra ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3compression library - runtime Versions of packages audacious-plugins recommends: ii audacious 2.4.4-1small and fast audio player which audacious-plugins suggests no packages. -- no debconf information diff --git a/src/m3u/.m3u.c.swp b/src/m3u/.m3u.c.swp index 52fb8b1..ad60cf2 100644 Binary files a/src/m3u/.m3u.c.swp and b/src/m3u/.m3u.c.swp
