Bug#780023: xbmc: XBMC crash at startup

Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Hi Jeremy, 2015-03-08 11:57 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Guitton debo...@gmail.com: Package: xbmc Version: 2:13.2+dfsg1-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, On fresh install of jessie with Gnome Desktop, XBMC crash at startup. I join the log file. From the

Bug#780023: xbmc: XBMC crash at startup

Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Hi Jeremy, 2015-03-08 11:57 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Guitton debo...@gmail.com: Package: xbmc Version: 2:13.2+dfsg1-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, On fresh install of jessie with Gnome Desktop, XBMC

Re: xbmc on rpi2

Hi Karl, 2015-03-03 22:21 GMT+01:00 Mag. Dr. Karl Kashofer karl.kasho...@gmx.at: Hi all ! I try to run xfce + xbmc on an rpi2 and keep failing. xfce runs fine on a debian install taken from http://sjoerd.luon.net/posts/2015/02/debian-jessie-on-rpi2/ However, xbmc will not run, it complains

Bug#778995: forked-daapd: Does not work with iTunes 12.1

Package: forked-daapd Version: 0.22.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream fixed-upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ejurgensen/forked-daapd/issues/100 Latest iTunes can't work with forked-daapd. Upstream has already released a fix. Cheers, Balint

Re: antlr3 on slow machines

:44 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org: Le 24/02/2015 13:23, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : Bálint Réczey dixit: Not that I am lazy but I think instead of patching every package using antlr antlr itself should be patched to use higher default timeouts on slow platforms. can we please get

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

2015-04-30 11:30 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Alessandro Ghedini (2015-04-30 11:19:39) While the work done by Reinard (and others) maintaining the libav package is outstanding and very appreciated, it just seems to make more sense to go with ffmpeg. So I vote ffmpeg too.

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

2015-04-29 20:56 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: 'Evening Ladies and Gentlemen, I am afraid that I have to revive this discussion once again now that Jessie is out as we have plenty of time before starting doing any major work for Stretch: it's really the right time to make a

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi IOhannes, 2015-05-09 21:56 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at: On 05/09/2015 04:34 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: It might have ended in some spam filter, at least I suspect that's the reason the mail didn't make it to the list. most mailman mailinglists do not like it,

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

2015-05-09 22:22 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Hi IOhannes, 2015-05-09 21:56 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at: On 05/09/2015 04:34 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: It might have ended in some spam filter, at least I suspect that's the reason the mail

Re: test build on foreign arch

Hi, 2015-05-10 9:30 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com: Hi, I would like to test build of package on foreign arch (mips mipsel and powerpc). Is there some easy way to do it ? Or is it fine to do it by uploading to unstable? IMO it is perfectly fine especially if the package is

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Reinhard, 2015-05-09 15:10 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org: On 2015-05-09 11:19, Alessio Treglia wrote: Hi, Admittedly seems there is more activity on FFmpeg's than libav's side. It does not necessarily reflect into higher quality though - plus, libav is not dead at all

Bug#785326: libavcodec56: CVE-2014-7937 - Multiple off-by-one errors in libavcodec/vorbisdec.c

2015-05-16 15:31 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org: On 2015-05-16 15:28:44, Arne Wichmann wrote: begin quotation from Sebastian Ramacher (in 20150516130757.ga21...@ramacher.at): On 2015-05-15 15:22:28, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:05:17AM +0200,

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Could you please quote ***only the parts*** to which you are replying? Sure. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

2015-05-16 13:52 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: ... I wouldn't. And now let's keep the discussion go on and wait for others to share their view. Please propose a deadline for sharing views/casting votes. This would sound stupid in Stretch's release notes: We include Libav in

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Reinhard, 2015-05-18 12:16 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: ... These days, FFmpeg for sure asks for most (if not all) CVE numbers recently assigned, and claims to provide patches for them. FFmpeg not only claims to provide patches, but actually does provide them:

Re: Request to Join Project Debian Multimedia Maintainers from Fabian Greffrath (fabian)

2015-05-18 14:29 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org: On 18 May 2015 at 05:55, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-18 10:04, nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote: Joining with my fab...@debian.org

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

2015-05-18 17:50 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: ... and I don't really understand why you are asking for explanation. I thought is was obvious from above that I merely bounced a question asked by Alessandro back to himself. I suggest stopping that. Define how you quantify long-term

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Andreas, 2015-06-06 21:29 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Bálint, On 06.06.2015 21:00, Bálint Réczey wrote: 2015-06-06 20:10 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: That's not how I interpret DFSG §1 [1]: 1. Free Redistribution

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Andreas, 2015-06-07 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Fabian, On 07.06.2015 14:39, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am Samstag, den 06.06.2015, 21:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun: Maybe we could even find a reasonable way to implement this in a dh7-style

Re: exclude mipsel from build

2015-06-09 11:08 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com: 2015-06-09 10:41 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org: On 2015-06-09 10:16:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: I tried this, but it is not workiing :( Architecture: !mipsel or Architecture: any !mipsel What is right way?

Re: exclude mipsel from build

2015-06-09 13:25 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com: 2015-06-09 11:25 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: 2015-06-09 11:08 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com: 2015-06-09 10:41 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org: On 2015-06-09 10:16:09, Jaromír

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Andreas, 2015-06-05 17:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Bálint, On 05.06.2015 17:25, Bálint Réczey wrote: 2015-06-05 0:28 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: ... That's not only because of optimization, but also for licensing

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Andreas, 2015-06-06 19:15 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi, On 06.06.2015 02:01, Bálint Réczey wrote: GPL imposes no restrictions on _using_ software, but on distributing it without properly licensed source, i.e. distributing a binary compiled from GPLv3

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Andreas, 2015-06-06 20:10 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Bálint, On 06.06.2015 19:51, Bálint Réczey wrote: 2015-06-06 19:15 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: On 06.06.2015 02:01, Bálint Réczey wrote: The problem

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Reinhard, 2015-06-06 20:30 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: ... I'm OK with disabling AMR encoder in ffmpeg and stay GPLv2 compatible with the packages since I have no packages requiring it nor use

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Andreas, 2015-06-06 21:05 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: The current libav packaging already implements this in a way that the user can choose what packages to install. On a personal note: The libav packaging can surely be improved and simplified. But

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi All, 2015-06-21 12:24 GMT-07:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Reinhard, On 19.06.2015 23:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Jun 18, 2015 7:15 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: The altivec optimizations on powerpc are still disabled, but I

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi All, 2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi IOhannes, On 09.06.2015 09:03, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: On 2015-06-09 06:35, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun: So one can just

Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

Hi Alessio, 2015-06-18 19:25 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: While the team has not announced a formal decision the majority of the team supports FFmpeg (which you don't ;-). I've never denied that: [1

Re: multiple uploaders

2015-05-27 9:26 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org: Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2015, 14:38 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: I think the rule is useless. It doesn't prevent us from having two persons on Uploaders and both are MIA. I'd rather orphan/remove the packages from the team that

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Dmitry, 2015-05-29 12:22 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org: Thanks for insight into upstream security situation, Balint. So what would be the next step? Mass bug filings? Shall we draft a template here? Andeas already proposed a transition plan [1] and already submitted several

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Andreas, 2015-06-01 17:45 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Bálint, On 01.06.2015 17:37, Bálint Réczey wrote: 2015-06-01 15:33 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org: On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote: - Sebastian, you made the most

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

2015-06-01 17:37 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Hi Sebastian, 2015-06-01 15:33 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org: On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote: - Sebastian, you made the most recent uploads of the Libav package where I handed off upstream

Bug#786989: xbmc: Eject/Load fails to eject my DVD

Hi, 2015-05-27 16:11 GMT+02:00 monn...@iro.umontreal.ca: Package: xbmc Version: 2:13.2+dfsg1-4 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I installed xbmc on a Mac-Mini running Debian stable. I did adduser xbmc, then added this user to groups cdrom, video, audio, plugdev, and powerdev, and then

Bug#787018: src:xbmc: xbmc does not build on unstable

Control: tags -1 wontfix Hi Loong Jin, 2015-05-27 22:06 GMT+02:00 Chow Loong Jin hyper...@debian.org: Package: src:xbmc Version: FTBFS on unstable (libcec changes?) Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, sbuild

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

2015-05-30 23:54 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: ... I'd rather keep the packaging of the package that is currently called libav, because on many architectures, it compiles multiple flavors with hardware optimized flavors (on i386 for instance, there is a flavor without latest

Re: [SCM] gpac/master: Update changelog

Hi Alessio, Gpac is ready to upload now. I saw you did the last uploads, would you like to do this one, too? If not, I plan uploading the changed package on Monday. Cheer, Balint On 27 Jun 2015 17:50, rbal...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi, 2015-06-23 13:59 GMT-07:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Matteo, On 23.06.2015 21:51, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: On 2015-06-23 at 17:56 (CEST), Bálint Réczey wrote: [...] Is there anything left to be fixed before we can start the transition? Yes, the total

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi All, I have contacted Moritz asking him to share his opinion regarding FFmpeg/Libav. He is not on the list thus asked me to forward his email. Please see his answer inline. 2015-05-18 15:11 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.org: On lun, mag 18, 2015 at 01:47:25 +0100, Alessio Treglia

Bug#786688: xbmc: CVE-2015-3885

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/7188 Control: tags -1 confirmed upstream 2015-05-24 14:44 GMT+02:00 Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org: Package: xbmc Severity: important Tags: security Please see http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2015-006.html Could you report

Bug#795813: kodi: FTBFS with g++-5: multiple definitions of argument-parsing stuff

Hi Simon, 2015-08-17 9:31 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie s...@debian.org: Source: kodi Version: 14.2+dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: patch kodi fails to build from source when binNMU'd for the libstdc++ transitions:

Bug#795718: Don't include libav in stretch

Hi All, 2015-08-19 21:18 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Moritz, On 19.08.2015 15:53, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:08:01PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: On 16.08.2015 14:27, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: It was decided to switch to

Bug#790635: Please support ARM64

Hi Martin, 2015-06-30 15:26 GMT+02:00 Martin Michlmayr t...@hp.com: Package: xbmc Version: 2:13.2+dfsg1-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 Looks like aarch64 (aka arm64) needs an entry in configure.in. sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.64.1 (13 Oct 2013) on

Bug#787018: src:xbmc: xbmc does not build on unstable

Hi Mattia, 2015-08-09 16:12 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo mat...@mapreri.org: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:20:08PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: XBMC has been renamed to Kodi and I have already packaged it. It is waiting for FTP Master approval in the NEW queue for some time. I don't plan updating

Re: Comments regarding kodi_14.2+dfsg1-2_i386.changes

Hi, 2015-07-13 14:50 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Alteholz alteh...@debian.org: Hi Balint, On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Bálint Réczey wrote: Do you have any more comments which I should also fix? no, thats the only one, so I will accept the package now and you can do the rest... Thanks! Cheers, Balint

Re: kodi_15.2~rc3+dfsg1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Rhonda, 2015-10-22 14:01 GMT+02:00 Rhonda D'Vine : > > Please do not upload before the package transitioned to testing. There seems > to be issues with that and I'd suggest to investigate them before uploading > to backports. > Thanks, Rhonda Thank you

Bug#777041: xbmc: unable to disable extensive debug logging

Hi Jonathan, 2015-03-02 23:10 GMT+04:00 Jonathan McDowell <nood...@earth.li>: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 07:27:21PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2015-02-04 11:00 GMT+01:00 Jonathan McDowell <nood...@earth.li>: >> > I'm hoping I'm just missing something here, but th

Bug#803831: kodi: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

Control: tags -1 confirmed pending Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/8112#issuecomment-154432878 Hi Andreas, 2015-11-03 1:07 GMT+04:00 Andreas Cadhalpun : > Package: kodi > Version: 15.2~rc3+dfsg1-1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch >

Re: Uploading FFmpeg to jessie-backports

Hi All, Just a short update 2015-09-30 16:33 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: ... > I see you did a lot of triaging related to this bug, thank you! > The bug does not affect Jessie, but only packages already in testing > can be uploaded thus I plan performing u

Bug#800938: kodi: segfault on start

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Vladimir, 2015-10-06 17:06 GMT+02:00 Vladimir Stavrinov <vstavri...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:17:19PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> It seems there is something with X/OpenGL, > > Yes, You are right: > >> 11:51:22 T:1

Re: Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4

2015-07-08 13:12 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same

Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4

2015-07-08 13:00 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same. The library has been moved to the multiarch location. Which package do you want

Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4

2015-07-08 12:45 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: 2015-07-08 12:36 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the reverse dependencies

Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4

2015-07-08 10:43 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Hi Alessio, 2015-07-07 17:31 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Hi Alessio, 2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: Hello Balint, On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj d...@gmx.de wrote

Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4

Hi Alessio, 2015-07-07 17:31 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Hi Alessio, 2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: Hello Balint, On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj d...@gmx.de wrote: Package: gpac Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1 The package

Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4

2015-07-08 12:36 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the reverse dependencies (x264) already gets broken when it is upgraded I suggest uploading

Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4

Hi Alessio, 2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: Hello Balint, On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj d...@gmx.de wrote: Package: gpac Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1 The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libgpac4. I need a few days because I'm traveling

Re: libav and FFmpeg: switch over

Hi Reinhard, 2015-07-11 15:01 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: Keeping the libavcodec-extra packages makes very much sense to me, thank you. Do you need help with uploading to experiemental? As soon as it is in I sponsored Andreas' uploads, but I'm away from my computer for a

Re: libav and FFmpeg: switch over

Hi, 2015-07-11 16:03 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Reinhard, On 11.07.2015 15:01, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Keeping the libavcodec-extra packages makes very much sense to me, thank you. :-) Do you need help with uploading to experiemental? If you want

Bug#810011: nmu: Please try building kodi-pvr-hts again

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, I have updated libcec-platform which is a transitive build-dependency of kodi-pvr-hts and now kodi-pvr-hts builds fine

Bug#808750: Package does not have a description

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Max, 2015-12-22 14:04 GMT+01:00 Max Kellermann : > Package: kodi-pvr-njoy > Version: 1.10.7+git20150717-1 > > "NJOY PVR Addon for Kodi" is the same as the package name, but I still > don't know what it is. Do you have a better suggestion? Cheers,

Re: kodi-pvr-hts_2.1.18-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Hi Thorsten, 2015-11-25 22:27 GMT+01:00 Thorsten Alteholz <alteh...@debian.org>: > > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> >> OK, I always handled ITP-s as a must but in seems to be just a strong >> recommendation to have one. > > > If there

Re: kodi-pvr-hts_2.1.18-1_amd64.changes is NEW

; > BR, > > Tobias > > > Am 24.11.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Bálint Réczey: > >> Hi Tobias, >> >> I think ITP will be missing from the changelog. >> >> Cheers, >> Balint >> >> 2015-11-23 23:48 GMT+01:00 Debian FTP Masters >>

Re: [SCM] kodi-pvr-hts packaging branch, master, created. 42c0d9c951bd3e376a417754fee5dd05763fcd89

Hi Tobias, Do you plan uploading the package to unstable? Since Kodi seems to be working properly I'm thinking about packaging the addons replacing the ones provided by xbmc-pvr-addons. Cheers, Balint 2015-10-03 0:27 GMT+02:00 : > The branch, master has

Re: kodi-pvr-hts_2.1.18-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Hi Tobias, I think ITP will be missing from the changelog. Cheers, Balint 2015-11-23 23:48 GMT+01:00 Debian FTP Masters : > binary:kodi-pvr-hts is NEW. > source:kodi-pvr-hts is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action >

Bug#825873: kodi-data depends on font unavailable in jessie/jessie-backports

Control: notfound -1 16.1+dfsg1-1~bpo8+1 2016-05-31 3:34 GMT+02:00 Jesse Rhodes : > Package: kodi > Version: 16.1+dfsg1-1~bpo8+1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > When installing kodi from jessie-backports on a my media player running > jessie, I noticed that

Re: Making Kodi installable again in testing

HI Pander, 2016-06-09 13:54 GMT+02:00 Pander : > Dear all, > > Kodi (version 15.2 and version 16.1) isn't installable at the moment in > Debian testing. Could someone please fix the dependencies for this so > testing on this can move forward? > > Thanks, > > Pander >

Bug#825078: Audio over HDMI not working

Control: notfound -1 16.1+dfsg1-1 Hi, 2016-05-30 10:15 GMT+02:00 Erik de Castro Lopo <er...@mega-nerd.com>: > Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> Would you like to share some info about the HW? > > Its just a standard Intel NUC with a Core i5 CPU and 16Gig RAM. As you would

Re: kodi_16.0+dfsg1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Hi Tobias, I have updated kodi (to 16.x) and kodiplatform in jessie-backports and I plan updating the PVR addons I usually upload, too. Do you plan updating the VNSI and hts addons? Cheers, Balint 2016-03-03 15:52 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: > Hi Tobias, > &g

Bug#825760: kodi: Crash on startup when connecting to CEC adapter

Hi Torsten, 2016-05-29 21:17 GMT+02:00 Torsten Crass : > OK, > > maybe I was a little dumb... The crash symptoms I described in my initial > report resulted from an attempt to reproduce the problem by remotely calling > kodi through an ssh connection. I don't know how

Bug#825078: Audio over HDMI not working

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Erik, 2016-05-23 14:17 GMT+02:00 Erik de Castro Lopo : > Source: kodi > Version: 16.1+dfsg1-1 > Severity: normal > > After upgrading from kodi-15 to kodi-16, audio over HDMI stopped working > on my dedicated kodi box. > > I spent a *lot* of time

Bug#809488: kodi does not suspend anymore

Control: notfound -1 15.2+dfsg1-1 Hi Johannes, 2015-12-31 16:35 GMT+01:00 Johannes Schauer : > Hi, > > Quoting Johannes Schauer (2015-12-31 10:29:22) >> I used to run Debian Jessie with Mate as a DM with Kodi from backports. >> With that setup Kodi used to suspend just fine. >>

Bug#825078: Audio over HDMI not working

2016-05-29 23:03 GMT+02:00 Erik de Castro Lopo <er...@mega-nerd.com>: > Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> Have you checked the suggestions listed here?: >> http://kodi.wiki/view/PulseAudio > > Yes, I did. The problem was not at the PusleAudio level, because ALSA > did not

Bug#825768: libavcodec-ffmpeg56 : Depends: libx265-59 (>= 1.7) but it is not installable [home.experiatis.com]

Dear Jaoued, 2016-05-29 19:02 GMT+02:00 Jaoued ZAHRAOUI : > Package: libavcodec-ffmpeg56 > Version: 2.8.6-1~bpo8+1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > impossible to install this package due to dependencie libx265-59 missing. > by the way, libx265-79 is avalaible.

Re: Kodi out from debian stable

Hi Alessandro, 2016-01-10 22:15 GMT+01:00 Alessandro : > Dear debian-multimedia and pkg-multimedia-maintainers, > > I write this e-mail for asking you because Kodi and related packages present > in the main repo of debian stable (Jessie) until 2 days ago, today they are > not

Re: gcc 5 internal error, building supercollider 3.7.0

Hi Dan, 2016-03-17 10:13 GMT+01:00 Dan S : > Hi all, > > I'm importing the new version of SuperCollider (3.7.0). > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git/log/ > > However, current status on my debian box is that GCC 5.3.1 dies on an > internal

Bug#818201: kodi: Jasper removal

Control: tags -1 confirmed pending upstream Hi Moritz, 2016-03-14 20:19 GMT+01:00 : > Source: kodi > Severity: important > User: j...@debian.org > Usertags: jasper-rm > > Hi, jasper will be removed from Debian for the stretch release (and > following that, the archive in

Re: kodi_16.0+dfsg1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

eers, Balint > > Tobias > > On 02.03.2016 03:48, Tobias Grimm wrote: > >> Hi Balint! >> >> Makes sense. I'll test the vnsi addon with the new version of kodiplatform >> today and update the hts addon as well. >> >> bye, >> >> Tobias &g

Bug#774038: xbmc: When going fullscreen watching through xbmc-pvr-tvheadend-hts makes video stays black

Control: notfound -1 14.0+dfsg1-1 Control: fixed -1 14.0+dfsg1-1 Hi Bernhard, This has been fixed in Kodi AFAIK I just forgot closing the bug from the changelog. Cheers, Balint ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Bug#823206: gb: armhf kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Build of kodi failed on buildd, but I have successfully rebuilt it on debomatic from the same source:

Re: kodi-pvr-hdhomerun_1.0.4+git20151120-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, I'm sorry, I completely missed your previous email about the package. I'll fix the issue in next upload. Thanks, Balint 2016-04-14 4:00 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Alteholz : > > Hi Balint, > > as there seems to be no progress, I am rejecting the package for

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

2013/12/15 Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de: On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote: On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote: Package: mplayer Severity:

libav backport for Wheezy

Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers, In the last weeks I was busy with reviving XBMC in Debian and looking at the package building fine for unstable I may have become overly ambitious, I but started thinking about back-porting the latest version to Wheezy after it migrated to testing. The most

Bug#702762: More or less dead upstream

2014/1/11 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: I would suggest libavfilter. What do you need libpostproc for exactly? It is used for deinterlacing DVD videos in XBMC. I just started to maintain XBMC and noticed that libpostproc is not in stable thus back-porting XBMC to Wheezy needs a

Bug#702762: More or less dead upstream

2014/1/11 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: For deinterlacing, have you looked at vf_yadif, (part of libavfilter)? That would give you much better deinterlacing results anyways. No I haven't, but I will. Thanks. Regarding filing bugs, you may be right. Do you have some spare cycles and

Bug#702762: More or less dead upstream

2014/1/11 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: I think filing bugs is the best way of starting the removal of libpostproc. There are only a few packages depending on it, thus adding a linitian warning may be overkill

Bug#702762: More or less dead upstream

2014/1/12 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: From the email [1] on the VLC list I had the impression that libpostproc is broken. That is my understanding as well. That's why I wanted to hear from you XBMC needs

Re: Joining pkg-multimedia

2014-02-04 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org: On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Hi, I'm Balint Reczey [1], and I would like to join the Multimedia Team. I maintain the xbmc package which depend on many packages maintained by the team. I also

Re: [SCM] libdvdnav/master: Merge tag 'upstream/4.9.0__gita5c13254'

Hi, 2014-02-12 14:47 GMT+01:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: FYI: I intend to switch our system libdvdnav library to the version provided on videolan. Some discussion on this fork can be seen on the dvdnav mailing list:

Re: [SCM] libdvdnav/master: Finalize changelog

, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Hi All, Sorry, the reverts were not complete thus the current state does not work. I would like to reset master to debian/4.2.1-2 and add the dvdnav_dup patches cleaning the history. I know rolling back git branches

Re: [SCM] libdvdnav/master: Merge tag 'upstream/4.9.0__gita5c13254'

2014-02-22 18:26 GMT+01:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 12.02.2014, 20:49 -0500 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Hi

Bug#741170: [libav] XBMC quits playing corrupt stream from PVR backend due to libav

Source: libav Version: 6:10~beta1-2 Severity: important Hi, The problem has been originally reported at upstream [1] [2]. XBMC should keep playing the corrupt stream since otherwise errors in broadcast signals would make watching TV impossible. Vanilla XBMC using its in embedded FFmpeg plays the

XBMC PVR addons package informal RFH

Hi, I have uploaded an improved version of the package distributed by upstream for Ubuntu [1] throug a PPA. It is now in NEW and the packaging repo [2] is available under collab-maint. I would like to move the package to under team-maintenance in next upload. Can I make this change or there is

VDPAU does not work with Libav 10 and XBMC 13

Hi, Could someone familiar with Libav debugging please check this bug? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742896 XBMC seems to work with latest FFMpeg but not with latest Libav. :-( Thanks advance, Balint ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Bug#742896: xbmc: Blank video with VDPAU enabled

Hi Sergej, Thanks for the testing. 2014-03-30 13:43 GMT+02:00 Sergej Wildemann wildem...@finf.uni-hannover.de: 2014-03-28 21:28 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: You could recompile mpv from experimental branch: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/mpv.git

Re: xbmc-pvr-addons_12.0+79+ge1c3fb1+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Torsten, 2014-03-31 12:00 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Alteholz ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: Dear Balint, thanks for removing those AFPL-files. Unfortunately debian/coypright doesn't seem to contain the changes you mentioned in your email. So I need to reject the package again. Apparently I

Bug#743314: xbmc-pvr-addons: xbmc-pvr-dvbviewer is not built due to licensing issues

Package: xbmc-pvr-addons Version: 12.0+79+ge1c3fb1+dfsg1-3 Severity: wishlist Control: tag -1 +upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/opdenkamp/xbmc-pvr-addons/issues/287 The dvbviewer addon links AFPL and GPL licensed source files which creates a legally not distributable binary.

Re: Bug#742896: xbmc: Blank video with VDPAU enabled

tags 742896 help upstream thanks Hi Sergej, 2014-04-01 15:00 GMT+02:00 Sergej Wildemann wildem...@finf.uni-hannover.de: 2014-03-30 19:25 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: We can try two approaches. I copied what mpv does in the first patch, but it us just a hunch and I could

Re: Bug#742896: xbmc: Blank video with VDPAU enabled

2014-04-03 21:52 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: tags 742896 help upstream thanks Hi Sergej, 2014-04-01 15:00 GMT+02:00 Sergej Wildemann wildem...@finf.uni-hannover.de: ... I assume that it should crash when the assert fails, but it doesn't. Is this a problem with my

Re: Bug#743619: vdr-plugin-vnsiserver: Is the Depends on xbmc necessary?

Hi Michael, 2014-04-07 12:21 GMT+02:00, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com: Control: reassign -1 src:xbmc-pvr-addons On Vi, 04 apr 14, 11:04:06, Michael Fladischer wrote: Source: vdr-plugin-vnsiserver Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, is it possible to lower xmbc from Depends to

  1   2   3   >