:)
best regards
mira
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:22 PM, george germain rockstead...@gmail.com wrote:
libffado2
version: 2.0.99+svn1924-1
apt-get source libffado2
for other versions ( etc ), look to the debian archives. this package
looks to be in SVN, so use apt-get source to get the upstream SVN link
and work
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Alessandro Ghedini al3x...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:11:34AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Anyway, I'd shorten the features list just a bit.
Done (I think).
P: deadbeef: no-upstream-changelog
Easy to fix:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Alessandro Ghedini al3x...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:22:29PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
At first glance, it seems like you're newlining a bit too much on the
control deps. It's valid, and better then a single line, but see if
you can
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Alessandro Ghedini al3x...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package deadbeef.
* Package name : deadbeef
Version : 0.4.4~dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Alexey Yakovenko waker at users.sourceforge.net
* URL :
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Alessandro Ghedini al3x...@gmail.com wrote:
That does not comply with DFSG [1].
Sorry if I am annoying, but I was wondering if it would be acceptable
(for you, the Debian Multimedia Team and Debian Policy in general) to
just cut off the non DFSG-compliant
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote:
The upload would be:
version-N+dfsgX
It had better set something similar to:
version-N~dfsg
This makes us able to drop the ~dfsg
Scuse the spelling misakes and top post, I'm on my droid.
I repkgd this a while back for kicks. I blasted my debdir about a month ago.
IIRC the issues are:
His email /name was not the same as the control, it thought it was a NMU.
The deb rev no should be -1 and not -0
You should also provide a
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:53:28PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I repkgd this a while back for kicks. I blasted my debdir about a month ago.
Too bad you didn't put it in git ;)
I did, I had it on github, but I cleaned
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
gabrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 12:49:44 pm Paul Tagliamonte
wrote:
There was an odd license on it, too, iirc.
Looks like it's regular GPLv2+ now
Cool. I remember reading something about a stipulation
10 matches
Mail list logo
