On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:27:24 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
wrote:
Can you please explain this? On what basis do we want to build against
jackd2 instead of jackd1?
this indicates that dssi works also when built
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
No, but I want to avoid that other maintainers pick up this as bad
example espc. when they are unsure about the situation and don't know
what to do. In the next upload, please properly document that this is an
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Adrian Knoth
a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
JFTR: jackd2 has no jack-session support, yet. Jack session is only
available in jackd1-svn atm, but you probably already know. ;)
Oh man, what an idiot...
Of couse I have noticed that in some upstream's documents
