Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 00:04 + schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> >> I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental
> >> to sid within the new few
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia:
>> I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental
>> to sid within the new few days.
>
> ETA? I have uploaded audacity 1.3.12-11 which makes the experi
Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental
> to sid within the new few days.
ETA? I have uploaded audacity 1.3.12-11 which makes the experimental
version useless.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Deve
Am 16.02.2011 15:37, schrieb Benjamin Drung:
Yes, please, please use libsoundtouch-dev (especially when there is no
reason against it). Then the next transition can be just binNMUs for
most packages.
Seconded, please keep the SONAME out of the -dev package name.
___
Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 14:35 + schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> Benjamin,
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Why not have libsoundtouch-dev, which provides the virtual
> > libsoundtouch0-dev?
>
> to be honest, there was no reason.
> However, since the package has
Benjamin,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Why not have libsoundtouch-dev, which provides the virtual
> libsoundtouch0-dev?
to be honest, there was no reason.
However, since the package has not hit unstable yet we may have
chances to fine-tune things.
WDYT?
--
Alessio
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:46 +, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental
> to sid within the new few days.
> Here is a short list of binary packages [1] which will be affected by
> the transition:
>
> gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> * Development package renamed: libsoundtouch1-dev changed to
> libsoundtouch0-dev, which Provides the virtual 'libsoundtouch-dev'
> though.
Why not have libsoundtouch-dev, which provides the virtual
libsoundtouch0-dev?
--
Benja
Hi all,
I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental
to sid within the new few days.
Here is a short list of binary packages [1] which will be affected by
the transition:
gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
ihu
libsoundtouch-ocaml
liquidsoap
rezound
yatm
Some of them may need a bi