Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-23 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 00:04 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: > >> I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental > >> to sid within the new few

Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-17 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: >> I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental >> to sid within the new few days. > > ETA? I have uploaded audacity 1.3.12-11 which makes the experi

Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-17 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: > I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental > to sid within the new few days. ETA? I have uploaded audacity 1.3.12-11 which makes the experimental version useless. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Deve

Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-16 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 16.02.2011 15:37, schrieb Benjamin Drung: Yes, please, please use libsoundtouch-dev (especially when there is no reason against it). Then the next transition can be just binNMUs for most packages. Seconded, please keep the SONAME out of the -dev package name. ___

Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-16 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 14:35 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: > Benjamin, > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Why not have libsoundtouch-dev, which provides the virtual > > libsoundtouch0-dev? > > to be honest, there was no reason. > However, since the package has

Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-16 Thread Alessio Treglia
Benjamin, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Why not have libsoundtouch-dev, which provides the virtual > libsoundtouch0-dev? to be honest, there was no reason. However, since the package has not hit unstable yet we may have chances to fine-tune things. WDYT? -- Alessio

Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-16 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:46 +, Alessio Treglia wrote: > Hi all, > > I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental > to sid within the new few days. > Here is a short list of binary packages [1] which will be affected by > the transition: > > gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad

Re: Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-16 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 13:46 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: > * Development package renamed: libsoundtouch1-dev changed to > libsoundtouch0-dev, which Provides the virtual 'libsoundtouch-dev' > though. Why not have libsoundtouch-dev, which provides the virtual libsoundtouch0-dev? -- Benja

Small transition: soundtouch 1.5

2011-02-16 Thread Alessio Treglia
Hi all, I've planned to move the new soundtouch 1.5 release from experimental to sid within the new few days. Here is a short list of binary packages [1] which will be affected by the transition: gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad ihu libsoundtouch-ocaml liquidsoap rezound yatm Some of them may need a bi