separate discussion and development lists (was: Debian Multimedia Blend)

2010-08-13 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
 BTW, I have another issue:  This mailing list recieves a lot of
 packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
 However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o.  Do you
 see a chance that we move discussion like this about general project
 management, Blends stuff, user oriented questions to this mailing
 list.  I was asked to raise the Blends issue here on this list and
 so did I, but I would prefer if I would not be spammed by bug reports
 of multimedia packages which I'm simply not interested in.  In other
 projects such split between user oriented list @l.d.o and a maintainer
 list @a.l.d.o has turned out as quite reasonable.
 

Well, this was discussed at the time of the merge between the two teams.
Basically, we decided to have everything on the alioth list because we
feared the traffic was so small we would dilute the interest. Perhaps
the time has come to rethink this?

-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: separate discussion and development lists (was: Debian Multimedia Blend)

2010-08-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:

On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of 
packaging related information which I#m not really interested in. 
However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o.  Do 
you see a chance that we move discussion like this about general 
project management, Blends stuff, user oriented questions to this 
mailing list.  I was asked to raise the Blends issue here on this 
list and so did I, but I would prefer if I would not be spammed by 
bug reports of multimedia packages which I'm simply not interested 
in.  In other projects such split between user oriented list @l.d.o 
and a maintainer list @a.l.d.o has turned out as quite reasonable.




Well, this was discussed at the time of the merge between the two 
teams. Basically, we decided to have everything on the alioth list 
because we feared the traffic was so small we would dilute the 
interest. Perhaps the time has come to rethink this?


As I see it we now do not discuss opening up another communication 
channel but (re)using an old brand when marketing (some or all of) 
what we produce.



  - Jonas

--
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers