On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Chris S. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As a new Debian user, I believe I read the following document about
> multimedia codes:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/MultimediaCodecs
>
> However, as noted on the following two pages, Debian does n
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM, wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit 15c3fdd600ad05440cfc3b9016897c523de68c0d
> Author: Andres Mejia
> Date: Sat Mar 17 14:36:37 2012 -0400
>
> Update changelog.
>
> diff --git a/debian/chan
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, wrote:
> The branch, master has been created
> at c4c77bca931e1dd7e0cce072985e694fcd5bb2e4 (commit)
>
> - Shortlog
> commit c4c77bca931e1dd7e0cce072985e694fcd5bb2e4
> Au
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
>> About these latest changes, I removed the build dependency on
>> dh-autoreconf because a) it wasn't necessary, and b) because if we are
>
> It is, because we add
> libdvdcss_la_CFLAGS = -fvisibility=hidden
> in src/Makefile.am
> through
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-17 at 02:49pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> That pretty much means libdvdcss can be compiled on Debian down to
>> old-stable (if backports is used) and Ubuntu oneiric. For supporting
>> Ubuntu suites before on
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-18 at 12:22pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard
>> wrote:
>> > On 12-03-17 at 02:49pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> >> That pretty much means libdvdc
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for the following packages.
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-1_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says
libs.
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
This is now a
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for the following packages.
libvo-aacenc-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
libvo-aacenc0_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
These
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for the following packages.
libvo-amrwbenc-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional,
override says extra.
libvo-amrwbenc0_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Th
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for vainfo.
vainfo_1.0.15-4_amd64.deb: package says section is utils, override says libs.
vainfo is a utility program, not a library.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers maili
Here is what I propose in order to provide the lib*extra* packages
from the libav source package. [1] It essentially has libav building
the extra packages, thus no longer having to rely on a seperate source
package. This change ensures the regular and the extra packages are
built for all 'flavors'
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Hi Andres,
>
> Am 17.03.2012 18:48, schrieb Debian FTP Masters:
>
>> * Add hardened build flags excluding -O2 and -g.
>
>
> I don't quite get it. These packages already have dh compat 9 enabled and
> thus have the hardeneing build flags
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 18.03.2012 00:42, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>
>> libdvdcss-installer can be found at
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libdvdcss-installer.git
>>
>> Any comments/concerns?
>
>
> I
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 19.03.2012 03:59, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>
>> Though the build time is increased for libav, ultimately, this change
>> would be better as the buildd network would not have to cope with
>> building from two sourc
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 19.03.2012 13:53, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>>
>> Should stable be supported?
>
>
> I think so, but not necessarily without minor changes to the packaging. A
> package with minor adaption on backports.d.o would be sufficient IMHO. We
>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-19 at 08:59am, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Fabian Greffrath
>> wrote:
>> > Am 19.03.2012 03:59, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>> >
>> >> Though the build
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 19.03.2012 13:41, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>
>> x264 set -O3 by default. Us setting -O2 would have overridden that.
>> And with -g, x264 doesn't set -g by default (I presume because full
>> optimization
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 19.03.2012 10:25, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
>
>> I generally agree with your proposal, although "easier and less
>> error-prone" is in the eye of the beholder, of course. At least I am
>> currently a bit lost in your proposed diff again
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 19.03.2012 14:38, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>
>> I made the changes to filter out building of static libs for extra
>> packages. See [1]. Note that I rebased the changes from current
>> master, so if you checked
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 17.03.2012, 19:42 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia:
>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM,
>> wrote:
>> > The branch, master has been created
>> > at c4c77bca931e1dd7e0cce072985e694fcd5bb
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libva1
> Version: 1.0.15-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> please use a search path for the DRI modules that contains both
> /usr/lib//dri
> /usr/lib/dri
> While we can (hopefully) fix the Debian packages to ship the files in
> t
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Package: libva1
>> Version: 1.0.15-4
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> please use a search path for the DRI modules that contains bot
Here are some of the comments Reinhard said on IRC. Placing them here
for recording purposes.
[02:47] amejia: in the merged case, I think the -dev
packages can have tight dependencies on the library packages
[02:48] amejia: also, I think only libavcodec changes, so
in that case we'd no longer ne
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Dave Anglin wrote:
> Source: libav
> Version: 4:0.8.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> gcc -Llibavcodec -Llibavdevice -Llibavfilter -Llibavformat -Llibavutil
> -Llibpostproc -Llibswscale -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--warn-common
> -Wl,-rpath-link=libpostproc:libswscale:libavfilt
Ok, here are the changes to libav to include libav-extra so far. Just
tested these and they provide a smooth upgrade with libav/libav-extra
packages currently in unstable. avconv can use either libavcodec or
libavcodec-extra package and it works like it should. None of the
other packages were neces
Hi,
This has been a question that's been asked in the debian-devel mailing
list and among the Debian multimedia team recently. Why are packages
already in the Debian archive still being uploaded to DMO?
For example, there is lame, x264, and xvidcore which have been
uploaded to the Debian archive,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> Here are some of the comments Reinhard said on IRC. Placing them here
>> for recording purposes.
>>
>> [02:47] amejia: in the merged case, I think th
keep these packages updated in Debian instead (though this would
mean he would have to work with the team).
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Andres Mejia writes:
>
>> Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
>> This has been a question that's been asked in t
Alright, going to upload to experimental now.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, "Micah Gersten" wrote:
>
> On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler
wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you volunteer to do at least the first uploads for libav and
> >> libav-extra
On Mar 21, 2012 2:26 AM, "Christian Marillat" wrote:
>
> Andres Mejia writes:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> > This has been a question that's been asked in the debian-devel mailing
> > list and among the Debian multimedia team recently. Why are pac
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 2012 4:40 PM, "Micah Gersten" wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/21/2012 06:40 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Mar 2
52_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
> to main/liba/libav/libpostproc52_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
> libswscale-dev_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
> to main/liba/libav/libswscale-dev_0.8.1-2_amd64.deb
> libswscale-extra-2_0.8.1-2_all.deb
> to main/liba/libav/libswscale-extra-2_0.8.1-2_all.deb
> libswscale2_0.8.1-2_am
I should have worded that better.
Testers wanted. Please help test the new libav packages.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> Ok everyone. Feel free to starting testing the new libav packages.
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Debian FTP Masters
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stuart Prescott
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just to put some real data on packages that are in both Debian and
> debian-multimedia.org I extracted the appended data from UDD.
>
> I suspect that many will find inclusion o
2012/3/21 Andriy Beregovenko :
> Hi,
>
> I finished update package 'crtmpserver'.
> This is major update from the point of view of upstream update, but
> debian package changes are insignificant.
>
> So, please, upload updated version of package.
> --
> Best regards,
> Andriy
> 0xBDDBDAE3
>
> -
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stuart Prescott
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just to put some real data on packages that are in both Debian an
2012/2/10 Fabian Greffrath :
> Am 09.02.2012 16:49, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
>
>> Not obsoleted (yet). faac supports 1-6 channels and the main, lc, ssr
>> and ltp profiles. vo-aacenc only supports 1-2 channels and the lc
>> profile.
>
>
> OK, so it's good enough for the usual CD ripping.
>
> The cu
On Mar 22, 2012 11:29 AM, "Christian Marillat" wrote:
>
> Andres Mejia writes:
>
> > On Mar 21, 2012 2:26 AM, "Christian Marillat" wrote:
> >>
> >> Andres Mejia writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Also I upload my packages more quick
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
* Package name: faac
Version : 1.28
Upstream Author : Menno Bakker
* URL : http://www.audiocoding.com/
* License : GPL, LGPL, BSD, other
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : AAC a
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Stuart Prescott
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Andres,
>
>> Thanks. This really helps.
>
> glad to be of assistance :)
>
>> I was going to ask, could you do a query on sid showing the source
>> packages available in dmo only and in
On Mar 23, 2012 4:16 AM, "Fabian Greffrath" wrote:
>
> Am 23.03.2012 03:47, schrieb Debian FTP Masters:
>
>> * Add Build-Depends: libmp4v2-dev (>= 1.9.1).
>
>
> This should probably get reverted, as GPL'ed and MPL'ed code linked
together results in something unredistributable by Debian.
>
> - F
FYI, here is Christian's latest response.
~ Andres
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Christian Marillat"
Date: Mar 23, 2012 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: Duplicate Packages from Debian archive in DMO
To:
Andres Mejia writes:
> On Mar 22, 2012 11:29 AM, "Chr
I believe the libav-tools package should be split and the separate
binary programs each be installed in their own package. Out of all the
programs from libav/ffmpeg, I've rarely used ffplay, and I never used
the server or probe programs. It would also help if the server be it's
own package, complet
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Copyright says:
>
> "Those intending to use this software module in hardware or software
> products are advised that this use may infringe existing patents."
>
> This conflicts with http://www.debian.org/legal/patent, Policy statem
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> I believe the libav-tools package should be split and the separate
>> binary programs each be installed in their own package. Out of all the
>> programs fr
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi Andres,
>
> you need to Cc: the bug submitter if you expect answers.
>
> For libvdpau please see
> debian/patches/vdpau-module-searchpath.patch
> where I sanitized the searching to look in \${ORIGIN}/vdpau/,
> $libdir/vdpau/, /usr/lib/v
their minimal setup
of avserver if they choose to do so.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit ea819ac5706a98397a834d8f9a6972d92210e969
> Author: Andres Mejia
> Date: Tue Mar 27 14:44:27 2012 -0400
>
> S
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Andres Mejia writes:
>
>> On Mar 22, 2012 11:29 AM, "Christian Marillat" wrote:
>>>
>>> Andres Mejia writes:
>>>
>>> > On Mar 21, 2012 2:26 AM, "Christian Marillat&qu
Hi Christian,
So I'll ask one more time and if the answer is no (or you don't
respond), I won't bother you anymore. For the packages in DMO that can
now be uploaded to Debian, will you be willing to help upload and
maintain those packages in Debian?
--
~ Andres
__
On Mar 28, 2012 2:14 AM, "Christian Marillat" wrote:
>
> Andres Mejia writes:
>
> > Hi Christian,
> > So I'll ask one more time and if the answer is no (or you don't
> > respond), I won't bother you anymore. For the packages in DMO that can
&
On Mar 28, 2012 3:48 AM, "Reinhard Tartler" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:44 PM,
wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> > commit ea819ac5706a98397a834d8f9a6972d92210e969
> > Author: Andres Mejia
> >
On Mar 29, 2012 2:39 PM, "Reinhard Tartler" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:26 AM,
wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged in the libav-extra branch:
> > commit 1b7ca8d372075118db12c8f1d8fb565eca874183
> > Author: Andres Mejia
> >
Any package distributed through Debian is not suppose to use embedded
libav libraries. This seemed like an unwritten rule, and people in
debian-devel had this understanding as well. Now that it seems libav
gets at least 10 security fixes every point release, I believe this
merits adding checks for
r-perl3.69-1+b1
ii libtext-template-perl 1.45-2
ii man-db 2.6.1-2
ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3
-- no debconf information
>From 9d3349195b9618aab5f7e1c67e4094400edc5392 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Mejia
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:19:50 -0400
Su
On Apr 4, 2012 7:07 AM, "Alessio Treglia" wrote:
>
> Ave Stefano, hi all,
>
> and sorry for the delay, I chose to wait in silence and see if things
could
> get better without becoming "unfriendly".
> However now, after having seen this [1], I am convinced he's kidding us.
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012
On Apr 4, 2012 2:20 PM, "Stefano Zacchiroli" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > Stefano, I think it's time to give you a clear answer, which is:
> >
> > Yes, we consider debian-multimedia.org more harmful than useful
> > to the Debian Project an
Package: x264
Version: 2:0.120.2171+git01f7a33-3
Severity: wishlist
Reporting this to open discussion on this. It looks like 10 bit h264 encoding
is becoming the norm. We should allow some way to support both 10 bit and 8 bit
builds of x264, possibly making use of the alternatives system.
-- Syst
Just updated the FAQ in the wiki. See
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
These are updates about dmo. In particular, they answer the common
questions of "do we coordinate with dmo (no)" "do we support packages
from dmo (no)" and "is dmo a part of Debian (no)". Improvements are
welcome.
-
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override needs to be updated for all these packages.
libavdevice-extra-53_0.8.1-4_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override
says libs.
libavdevice-extra-53_0.8.1-4_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override
says optional.
libavfilter-
>
> Keep up the great work. -GLEN
>
>
> > Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2012, 21:07 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia:
> >> Just updated the FAQ in the wiki. See
> >> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
> >>
> >> These are updates about dmo. In partic
I see the strict internal dependencies was added long ago. [1] Is this
something that is still needed? I imagine each of the libraries don't
need these strict dependencies with one another anymore, and if it
still does, it should be bug. libpostproc will soon be it's own
package. Any thoughts on th
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 10:17 AM, AV Linux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks very much for taking time to reply, I'm relieved to see it is still
> there in the links in good company with the other mentioned projects. BTW
> the Studio-to-go link no longer has a domain so perhaps should be removed
> or updated
On Apr 12, 2012 10:38 AM, "Fabian Greffrath" wrote:
>
> Dear Stefano,
>
> Am 12.04.2012 14:26, schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
>
>> I'd appreciate your feedback on it.
>
>
> thank you very much for the draft.
Same here, thank you.
> However, sadly, I doubt this will lead us anywhere. I do not believ
On Apr 17, 2012 2:32 PM, "Debian FTP Masters" <
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Accepted:
> devede_3.21.0-1.debian.tar.gz
> to main/d/devede/devede_3.21.0-1.debian.tar.gz
> devede_3.21.0-1.dsc
> to main/d/devede/devede_3.21.0-1.dsc
> devede_3.21.0-1_all.deb
> to main/d/devede/d
On Apr 18, 2012 3:12 AM, "Alessio Treglia" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Christian Marillat
wrote:
> > * Another broken package uploaded...
>
> What is broken and why?
> Please elaborate.
>
>
> References:
>
http://www.debian-multimedia.org/lurker/message/20120417.233604.ee7320a1.
On Apr 13, 2012 2:04 AM, "Reinhard Tartler" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli
wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> >> Stefano, I think it's time to give you a clear answer, which is:
> >
> > Hi Alessio et al.,
> > thank you fo
On Apr 13, 2012 7:35 PM, "Benjamin Drung" wrote:
>
> On Do, 2012-04-12 at 14:26 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > > Stefano, I think it's time to give you a clear answer, which is:
> >
> > Hi Alessio et al.,
> > thank you fo
On Apr 19, 2012 11:30 AM, "Fabian Greffrath" wrote:
>
> Am 19.04.2012 17:09, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>
>> Filing a bug against devede would have been the appropriate step taken
>> to resolve this issue, not uploading a different package somewhere else.
>
>
>
Hi all,
After clarification that the bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668308 is indeed a
bug with dmo, I believe it will be useful to mark such bugs with a
usertag.
I propose such bugs be marked with usertag 'dmo'. If you're not sure
how to tag a bug with a usertag, it is the s
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> Hi all,
> After clarification that the bug
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668308 is indeed a
> bug with dmo, I believe it will be useful to mark such bugs with a
> usertag.
>
> I propose such bugs b
Could the headers not have simply been moved to /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
> gpac-dbg_0.4.5+svn4019~dfsg0-3_amd64.deb
> to main/g/gpac/gpac-dbg_0.4.5+svn4019~dfsg0-3_amd64.deb
> gpac-modules-base_0.4.5+svn4019~dfsg0-3_amd64.deb
> to
Err, I mean /usr/include/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH).
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> Could the headers not have simply been moved to /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu?
>
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Debian FTP Masters
> wrote:
>> gpac-dbg_0.4.5+svn4019
garding your Bug report
> > which was filed against the ffmpeg package:
> >
> > #660786: ffmpeg: please migrate /etc/ffserver.conf to /etc/avserver.conf
> >
> > It has been closed by Andres Mejia .
> [...]
> > From: Andres Mejia
> > Subject: Re: Bug#660786
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
>> Am 26.04.2012 18:18, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
>>> When I read statements like "Uploading ffmpeg would be a bad idea", it
>>> seems to me that the Debian-multimedia te
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Apr 28, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 26, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ha
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: libavcodec53
> Version: 6:0.8.1-5
> Severity: grave
>
> Your package is not installable, because it depends on both
> libavutil51 (>= 6:0.8.1-5) and libavutil51 (<< 5:0.8.1-99) which cannot
> possibly be both fulfilled.
>
>
> -- Syste
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Package: libav
> Version: 6:0.8.1-7
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> libav 6:0.8.1-7 reenables the use of opencv... which itself uses libav
> libraries. This currently makes libav unbuildable on mipsel and
> hurd-i386, and generically makes li
On May 3, 2012 9:24 AM, "Stefano Zacchiroli" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:26:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > I've drafted a message that I'd like to send to Christian publicly
> > Cc:-ing this list. It is attached to this mail for review by the
> > pkg-multimedia team. (Yes, I k
On May 3, 2012 9:30 AM, "Pino Toscano" wrote:
>
> Alle giovedì 3 maggio 2012, Andres Mejia ha scritto:
> > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Package: libav
> > > Version: 6:0.8.1-7
> > > Severity: important
> > >
On May 3, 2012 10:20 AM, "Andres Mejia" wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2012 9:30 AM, "Pino Toscano" wrote:
> >
> > Alle giovedì 3 maggio 2012, Andres Mejia ha scritto:
> > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > > Package: l
On May 3, 2012 5:36 PM, "Julien Cristau" wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:20:57 -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
>
> > I'm not entirely certain how build circular dependency issues like this
are
> > resolved. Perhaps we should ask for help from the toolchain pac
On May 4, 2012 4:43 PM, "Fabian Greffrath" wrote:
>
> > libav -> x264 -> libav
>
> AFAICT the x264 frontend uses libav whereas libav uses the libx264 shared
> library. So theortically (!) this issue could be solved by two separate
> source packages for the x264 frontend and the library.
>
> - Fab
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (The following is written based on the assumption we weren't contacted
> since the 4th of March [end of the previous x264 transition]; apologies
> if I missed some mails to debian-release@.)
>
> please coordinate with us for next x2
Late posting but...
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 01.02.2012 18:19, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>
>> Feel free to push what you currently have to git.debian.org, I might
>> find some time next week to have a closer look. Maybe we can get it to
>> use opencore-aac inst
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Dear Rogerio,
>
>> As I am a brand new dad, I want to transcode videos of my newborn son to
>> formats that other family members can see and the first thought of mine
>> was to do the job with handbrake.
>
> First of all, congratulations t
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Package: libavcodec-dev
> Severity: important
>
> Hi.
>
> The libavcodec-dev package is missing
> .
Audioconvert is not a public header in either libav or ffmpeg. What is
suppose to be used for this functionality is libavresample or
libswre
On May 12, 2012 2:22 AM, "Rogério Brito" wrote:
>
> Hi there.
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Rogério Brito
wrote:
> >> Package: libavcodec-dev
> >> Severity: important
> >>
&
owner 456165 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
retitle 456165 ITP: handbrake -- Rips and encodes DVDs
stop
The package is now being worked on. See [1].
1. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/handbrake.git
___
pkg-multime
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, wrote:
> The branch, master has been created
> at de1f9ddeef0932713c9d436d3ce28db14ebe9b39 (commit)
>
> - Shortlog
> commit de1f9ddeef0932713c9d436d3ce28db14ebe9b39
> Author: Rogério Brito
> Dat
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> The problem with that is that audioconvert.h is not part of the public
>> API. Moreover, most of the APIs have already been removed in current
>> libav/master in favor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
* Package name: libmkv
Version : 0.6.5.1
Upstream Author : saint...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/saintdev/libmkv
* License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Alternat
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
>
>>
>> I just noticed that libmkv was written specifically for handbrake. In
>> this case, I wouldn't even bother uploading libmkv separately and just
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-05-13 at 07:48pm, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> the 'old' libavcodec53, which a lot of applications link against,
>> becomes uninstallable because of the strict internal dependencies:
>>
>> Depends: libavutil51 (>= 4:0.8.1-0ubuntu1) | l
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Package: libavcodec53
> Severity: important
>
> I have now prepared a new upstream snapshot of libav at
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/experimental.
> In this new version, the SONAME
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On So, Mai 13, 2012 at 20:43:08 (CEST), Andres Mejia wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Reinhard Tartler
>> wrote:
>>> Package: libavcodec53
>>> Severity: important
>>>
>>>
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 11.05.2012, 16:10 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia:
>> Could it use vo-aacenc as an alternate?
>
> I've never considered. It's not like vo-aacenc is a drop-in replacement
> for faac, their APIs appe
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 12.05.2012, 11:29 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia:
>> I just glanced over the changes to this. To be on the safer side, the
>> symbols needed by handbrake and provided in audioconvert.c should be
>> built
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 13.05.2012, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> a) We could simply drop the strict internal dependencies.
>
> They served as a nice shelter against package mixture wth d-m.o packages
> in the past. But if they stand in
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
>> Unless I'm mistaken, on April 7th, while the discussion between me and
>> the pkg-multimedia-maintainer was going on, you've both renewed
>> debian-multimedia.org for anothe
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
