On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 09:15:20PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I don't think it is a practical problem to point than more than one diff
in the announcement and/or changelog. Do you?
For the Debian Security Team is pointer to an upload commit is usually
sufficient. Adding one would be much
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:55:02 (CEST), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:14:52 -0400, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:13 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Ping maintainers and debian security team. Indicate the security
issue, the
Le dimanche 18 juillet 2010 12:00:47 Reinhard Tartler, vous avez écrit :
So this piece of information is pretty useless for identifying
missing changes in 0.8.x.
That's not my problem (anymore). We have made about twenty releases, from
four different branches since Debian Stable has
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 13:25:30 (CEST), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Le dimanche 18 juillet 2010 12:00:47 Reinhard Tartler, vous avez écrit :
So this piece of information is pretty useless for identifying
missing changes in 0.8.x.
That's not my problem (anymore). We have made about
Hello,
Le dimanche 18 juillet 2010 17:56:16 Reinhard Tartler, vous avez écrit :
vlc-devel is a really high volume mailing list,
It's not so bad since commit logs were secluded to a list of their own.
Besides, we tend to tag relevant topics with '[PACKAGERS]'. At least the
OpenSUSE
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 17:23:48 (CEST), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
And I'm asking you *again*: What can we do so that the situation
improves? Are you evading my question? We know that we suck in this
regard, emphasizing this part from your side is probably not going to
improve the situation.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 06:14:26PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
I think the biggest problem we face here is communication. It is totally
unreasonable to expect everyone to read and follow vlc. Can you please
either be more explicit with your VSAs or perhaps create a more
specialized mailing
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 19:41:46 (CEST), Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 06:14:26PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
I think the biggest problem we face here is communication. It is totally
unreasonable to expect everyone to read and follow vlc. Can you please
either be more
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:50PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
It's not, and I've elaborated why in the paragraph you've killed in
your reply.
What do you need? sha1s of the commits?
This has not changed, but AFAIUI, there are only very focused and
documented changes in bugfix branches.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 20:09:33 (CEST), Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:50PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
It's not, and I've elaborated why in the paragraph you've killed in
your reply.
What do you need? sha1s of the commits?
That sounds great. Even better if in
Le dimanche 18 juillet 2010 21:02:50 Reinhard Tartler, vous avez écrit :
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 19:41:46 (CEST), Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 06:14:26PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
I think the biggest problem we face here is communication. It is totally
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 20:37:59 (CEST), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Le dimanche 18 juillet 2010 21:02:50 Reinhard Tartler, vous avez écrit :
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 19:41:46 (CEST), Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 06:14:26PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
I think the
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:14:52 -0400, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:13 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Ping maintainers and debian security team. Indicate the security
issue, the patch and or new tarball.
It's not like it's not known:
Hello,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:28:59 +0200, Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
I doubt that we can pull a new upstream version into a stable Ubuntu
release (e.g. vlc 1.1.0 in Ubuntu 10.04), because the new version breaks
the ABI of the older version and therefore break applications
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:49:15 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:28:59 +0200, Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
I doubt that we can pull a new upstream version into a stable Ubuntu
release (e.g. vlc 1.1.0 in Ubuntu 10.04), because the new version
[sorry for the resent, it seems the CC line was wrong in the previous mail]
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 14:54:53 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Hello,
I think it is fair to say that there is increasing frustration from users and
developers w.r.t. the state of VLC in Debian Ubuntu. I
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:22:11 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com wrote:
2010/7/12 Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net:
Hello,
I think it is fair to say that there is increasing frustration from
users and developers w.r.t. the state of VLC in Debian Ubuntu. I am
left
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:40:09 -0400, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
wrote:
So let's check:
| vlc | 0.8.6.release.e+x264svn20071224+faad2.6.1-0ubuntu3.3 |
hardy-updates/universe | source
| vlc | 0.9.9a-2ubuntu1 | jaunty/multiverse | source, amd64, i386
| vlc | 1.0.2-1ubuntu2 |
% apt-cache rdepends libvlc2
libvlc2
Reverse Depends:
vlc-nox
mozilla-plugin-vlc
libvlc-dev
% apt-cache showsrc vlc-nox libvlc-dev mozilla-plugin-vlc| \
grep Package: | uniq
Package: vlc
So the ABI issue is a non-issue, since nobody uses libvlc outside of vlc
itself.
It's
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:13 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Ping maintainers and debian security team. Indicate the security
issue, the patch and or new tarball.
It's not like it's not known:
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/stable
it lists 4 CVEs:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:13:22 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:40:09 -0400, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
wrote:
So let's check:
| vlc | 0.8.6.release.e+x264svn20071224+faad2.6.1-0ubuntu3.3 |
hardy-updates/universe | source
| vlc | 0.9.9a-2ubuntu1 |
21 matches
Mail list logo
