Re: On commit messages... again

2011-01-08 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/08/2011 03:19 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 03:04:55PM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 01/08/2011 01:05 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> Please, be descriptive in the commit messages. A commit message
>>> saying "add libblah-dev as build-depends" is not really useful, as we
>>> can see that from the patch. The point of commit messages is to
>>> explain why the changes are necessary (eg, "Enable support for doing
>>> something, needs libblah").
>>
>> hmm, 2 remarks on that:
>> - - given that git-dch _could_ be used to generate the changelog i would
>> recommend to put the description you want to see in debian/changelog as
>> the "title" (1st line) of the patch
>>
>> - - everything else (e.g why you think it is good and necessary to do
>> what
>> you have done, what you think might be done once there is time and why
>> and everything) ought to be in the "body" (line3-EOF (with line2 being
>> empty)) of the commit message
> 
> As a minimum, I agree.
> 
> Preferrably, though, even the first line (i.e. the changelog entry)
> include tiny explanation too IMO.


right

i did not try to say that one shouldn't include a tiny explanation in
the first line. i was more trying to stress, that the 1st line should be
useable as a changelog entry.

i also think that changelog entries should contain interesting information.

dfsgmt
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0odakACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQVFQCfYYi/k+xNEoiwR/L65E0k2rxn
Ao4AnRvlaoK7V/0GPSDlWn9DyL1f3Xkz
=mnx/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: On commit messages... again

2011-01-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 03:04:55PM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:

On 01/08/2011 01:05 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Please, be descriptive in the commit messages. A commit message 
saying "add libblah-dev as build-depends" is not really useful, as we 
can see that from the patch. The point of commit messages is to 
explain why the changes are necessary (eg, "Enable support for doing 
something, needs libblah").


hmm, 2 remarks on that:
- - given that git-dch _could_ be used to generate the changelog i would
recommend to put the description you want to see in debian/changelog as
the "title" (1st line) of the patch

- - everything else (e.g why you think it is good and necessary to do what
you have done, what you think might be done once there is time and why
and everything) ought to be in the "body" (line3-EOF (with line2 being
empty)) of the commit message


As a minimum, I agree.

Preferrably, though, even the first line (i.e. the changelog entry) 
include tiny explanation too IMO.


...and while at it, I prefer writing in present tense (not past tense) 
due to often being slightly shorter and equally appropriate IMO.



 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: On commit messages... again

2011-01-08 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/08/2011 01:05 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Please, be descriptive in the commit messages. A commit message saying
> "add libblah-dev as build-depends" is not really useful, as we can see
> that from the patch. The point of commit messages is to explain why
> the changes are necessary (eg, "Enable support for doing something,
> needs libblah").

hmm, 2 remarks on that:
- - given that git-dch _could_ be used to generate the changelog i would
recommend to put the description you want to see in debian/changelog as
the "title" (1st line) of the patch

- - everything else (e.g why you think it is good and necessary to do what
you have done, what you think might be done once there is time and why
and everything) ought to be in the "body" (line3-EOF (with line2 being
empty)) of the commit message

fgmasdr
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0obwcACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTdPACgqyYodGm5ml0GXko1CvECnzxD
76AAoK6TtNKG+YTh2kC1rBzYoNe1Hp6t
=b2S4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


On commit messages... again

2011-01-07 Thread Felipe Sateler
Please, be descriptive in the commit messages. A commit message saying
"add libblah-dev as build-depends" is not really useful, as we can see
that from the patch. The point of commit messages is to explain why
the changes are necessary (eg, "Enable support for doing something,
needs libblah").



-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers