Re: [SCM] rumor/master: Changelog for 1.0.5-1
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 05:04:47PM -0500, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: Alessio and list, On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:54:37PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Above could be merged to a single line like this: > > * Rewrite rules file using short-form debhelper v8 (was CDBS). > > > In addition to the shortening, that also corrects the bogus notion > of being an "update": You might (unlike some, including me) > consider CDBS inferior to short-form dh, but one is not a successor > for the other - they are just different, and both actively in use! Done. I've been scrapping all of my CDBS packaging for short-form dh because I was under the impression than dh had superseded CDBS; I'll know better for next time. If you do not dislike CDBS, would you mind me changing back to CDBS? It contains some powerful features IMO, which I would love to apply to this packaging too. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] rumor/master: Changelog for 1.0.5-1
Alessio and list, On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:54:37PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 04:42:53PM +, > > ryanakca-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > >> * We forgot to run git-dch before uploading. I updated the changelog > >> blurb > >> - for 1.0.4-1, everything after "Added myself tothe packaging > >> copyright" is > >> + for 1.0.4-1, everything after "Added myself to the packaging > >> copyright" is > >> an addition to that version's changelog. > > > > Above does not look like a changelog entry to me. Please consider > > rephrasing - or drop it completely if it does not relate to any real > > change in the resulting packaging. I've chosen to drop it since it doesn't change all that much. In case the message wasn't clear, last upload only had part of its changelog, so I added the rest of 1.0.4-1's changelog under 1.0.4-1 and put a note under 1.0.5-1 saying I had done so. > > Above could be merged to a single line like this: > > > > * Rewrite rules file using short-form debhelper v8 (was CDBS). > > > > > > In addition to the shortening, that also corrects the bogus notion > > of being an "update": You might (unlike some, including me) consider > > CDBS inferior to short-form dh, but one is not a successor for the > > other - they are just different, and both actively in use! Done. I've been scrapping all of my CDBS packaging for short-form dh because I was under the impression than dh had superseded CDBS; I'll know better for next time. > I'd intend to upload this, please fix the changelog and let me know > when ready. Done, thanks Alessio. Don't hesitate to prod me if there's anything else. Kind regards, -- |_)|_/ Ryan Kavanagh | GnuPG key | \| \ http://ryanak.ca/ | 4A11C97A (Transitioning from E95EDDC9) () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Ol qrpelcgvat guvf zrffntr lbh ner va ivbyngvba bs gur QZPN! signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] rumor/master: Changelog for 1.0.5-1
Ryan, On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 04:42:53PM +, > ryanakca-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > >> + * Update copyright with upstream's email change, new year >> + * Update Ryan's copyright years > > Seems to me that above should be merged (i.e. second line stripped). > > >> * We forgot to run git-dch before uploading. I updated the changelog >> blurb >> - for 1.0.4-1, everything after "Added myself tothe packaging >> copyright" is >> + for 1.0.4-1, everything after "Added myself to the packaging >> copyright" is >> an addition to that version's changelog. > > Above does not look like a changelog entry to me. Please consider > rephrasing - or drop it completely if it does not relate to any real change > in the resulting packaging. > > >> + * Bump to debhelper 8 >> + * Bump compat to 8 >> + * Drop CDBS from B-D >> + * Update rules to use dh8 > > [...] >> >> + * We need to run autogen.sh ourselves > > Above could be merged to a single line like this: > > * Rewrite rules file using short-form debhelper v8 (was CDBS). > > > In addition to the shortening, that also corrects the bogus notion of being > an "update": You might (unlike some, including me) consider CDBS inferior to > short-form dh, but one is not a successor for the other - they are just > different, and both actively in use! I'd intend to upload this, please fix the changelog and let me know when ready. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] rumor/master: Changelog for 1.0.5-1
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 04:42:53PM +, ryanakca-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: + * Update copyright with upstream's email change, new year + * Update Ryan's copyright years Seems to me that above should be merged (i.e. second line stripped). * We forgot to run git-dch before uploading. I updated the changelog blurb -for 1.0.4-1, everything after "Added myself tothe packaging copyright" is +for 1.0.4-1, everything after "Added myself to the packaging copyright" is an addition to that version's changelog. Above does not look like a changelog entry to me. Please consider rephrasing - or drop it completely if it does not relate to any real change in the resulting packaging. + * Bump to debhelper 8 + * Bump compat to 8 + * Drop CDBS from B-D + * Update rules to use dh8 [...] + * We need to run autogen.sh ourselves Above could be merged to a single line like this: * Rewrite rules file using short-form debhelper v8 (was CDBS). In addition to the shortening, that also corrects the bogus notion of being an "update": You might (unlike some, including me) consider CDBS inferior to short-form dh, but one is not a successor for the other - they are just different, and both actively in use! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
