Re: Bug#566779: snd: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: missing -ldl

2010-01-28 Thread Alessio Treglia
The package is ready and available via git [1], now we only need a
sponsor (I can't upload the package myself 'cause snd-nox is NEW).



[1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/snd.git

-- 
Alessio Treglia 
Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Bug#566779: snd: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: missing -ldl

2010-01-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Do, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:36:31 (CET), Alessio Treglia wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Petr Salinger  
> wrote:
>> I propose
>>
>> package snd-gtk-pulse everywhere, on linux uses ALSA, on GNU/kFreeBSD OSS
>> package snd-gtk-jack on i386 amd64 powerpc CPUs, i.e. also on kfreebsd-amd64
>> and kfreebsd-i386
>> package snd-nox everywhere, on linux uses ALSA, on GNU/kFreeBSD OSS
>
> Agreed.
> Do we really need to change the name? Could we simply leave
> snd-nox-alsa unchanged and build it with different configurations on
> Linux and kFreeBSD?

if that means to make the snd-nox-alsa package to use oss on kFreeBSD,
then I'd object to that idea. That would cause too much confusion IMO.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Bug#566779: snd: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: missing -ldl

2010-01-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mi, Jan 27, 2010 at 19:06:18 (CET), Alessio Treglia wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Cyril Brulebois  wrote:
>> Looks like -ldl is still missing. ;)
>
> Ths fix is easy, we can achieve that by adding -ldl to LDFLAGS.

please don't set this in debian/rules but in configure.ac so that this
fix can be upstreamed.

> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Petr Salinger  
> wrote:
>> It is needed to extend configure.ac and regenerate configure,
>> as shown in "Message #22 received at 566...@bugs.debian.org".
>
> Maybe did you mean the config.guess file? [1]
> Please could you prepare a patch?

no, here really configure.ac is meant. It is the source of the configure
script - autoconf expands with m4 macros when you run 'autoreconf -i'.


>>
>> Also cleanup of debian/control, like
>>
>>  Package: snd-gtk-pulse
>>  Architecture: any
>> -Provides: snd-gtk-alsa, snd-gtk
>> +Provides: snd-gtk-alsa [linux-any], snd-gtk
>>
>> is needed.
>
> I think it's still a non-valid expression, I can replace it with
> [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386]

AFAIR linux-any is valid for regular dependencies, but not for
build dependencies.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers