Processed: Re: rosegarden: crash. start, click view
Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #785576 [rosegarden] rosegarden: crash. start, click view Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 785576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785576 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: Re: rosegarden: crash. start, click view
Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #785576 [rosegarden] rosegarden: crash. start, click view Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #785576 to the same tags previously set -- 785576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785576 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Rosegarden testing needed [was Re: Rosegarden?]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Jonas, > Rosegarden needs some love. > > If noone objects, I will provide it some - including "infecting" it with > CDBS. A quick look at the current git will show that I have already given it a lot love, updated it to the current upstream version and worked on the packaging substantially. You'll also notice that the packaging does not use cdbs and instead uses dh7 and I'd personally prefer it to stay that way. What Rosegarden really needs now is some testing. It builds fine on a number of archs and has been tested on a couple but I'm not in the position to test whether it behaves nicely with jack. Testers welcome! cheers Stuart -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvQbRgACgkQn+i4zXHF0agBjACgpLCvBL+ft4et1GJFD0xFN+5q PZIAniu6Tk3c/xXQZz/Pz1uvLIc8MqXv =aNPo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rosegarden?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:53:08AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:46:35AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hi fellow multimedia maintainers, Rosegarden needs some love. Speaking of which, there is a rosegarden fork before they switched to QT4: http://www.openoctave.org/ I can't comment on either of the two, but "Open Octave" seems to be "the next big thing" in the Linux audio community. Wauw! From their web page, it seems that the Rosegarden fork, called OOMIDI, concentrate on MIDI, an that Rosegarden still have a role to play as a more general purpose application (I know it is highly appreciated among some primary school music teachers). (it worries me a bit that latest commit to OOMIDI was in november 2009, but hopefully that has no greater meaning) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rosegarden?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:46:35AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi fellow multimedia maintainers, > > Rosegarden needs some love. Speaking of which, there is a rosegarden fork before they switched to QT4: http://www.openoctave.org/ I can't comment on either of the two, but "Open Octave" seems to be "the next big thing" in the Linux audio community. Cheerio -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
