Re: libgmerlin0 -> libgmerlin1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/16/2011 02:14 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: > 2011/1/14 IOhannes zmölnig : >> but then: how come that there are MISSING stanzas at all? >> does this indicate, that at some point in the past, the library API did >> change, and it was ignored? > > I've fixed all lintian warnings, I think. > Please take a look. > i fixed the remaining manpage related lintian warnings, by adding both simple some manpages and by fixing the whatis entries in the generated manpages. since there is already an entry about manpages in debian/changelog, i guess we can do without regenerating debian/cl. apart from that, i think we are there! fg,asdf IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0zWigACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQ2zwCg4CgvJfPlSurUUhylYv2V9PEE ns0AoK5/4hhRN8ev0S/srT1CUtI1zPWs =tpF9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: libgmerlin0 -> libgmerlin1
2011/1/14 IOhannes zmölnig : > but then: how come that there are MISSING stanzas at all? > does this indicate, that at some point in the past, the library API did > change, and it was ignored? I've fixed all lintian warnings, I think. Please take a look. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: libgmerlin0 -> libgmerlin1
On 01/14/2011 07:16 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: > it seems like gmerlin-1.0.0 provides a libgmerlin that is binary > incompatible with the gmerlin-0.4.3 release. > > namely, some symbols have been dropped. hmm, after closer inspection ofthe output of dpkg-gensymbols, it seems like this was a false alarm. the libgmerlin0.symbols files contains a number of "MISSING" stanzas, which seem to have been merely updated: -#MISSING: 0.4.3# (optional)pixbuf_destroy_notify@Base 0.4.1 +#MISSING: 1.0.0~dfsg-1# (optional)pixbuf_destroy_notify@Base 0.4.1 it seems like all MISSING stanzas for 1.0.0 have also been there for 0.4.3 the rest of the changes are only additions. so i guess we are still save. but then: how come that there are MISSING stanzas at all? does this indicate, that at some point in the past, the library API did change, and it was ignored? > > as i understand it, this means that the SONAME has to change. > unfortunately i don't have any real clue what this means in practice. > > i guess, a start would be to simply rename the binary package to libgmerlin1 ah, i found the libpkg-guide. and that the soname should change in the build-process (automake) fbmas IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
