Re: projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-09-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
 09:47 siretart I've mailed yesterday, but it seems the mail got lost
 09:47 Ganneff (that you didnt get a reply yet doesnt mean lost)
 09:47 Ganneff your easiest (fastest) way is to upload something where
 the changes name differs
 09:47 Ganneff or, wait until im back home this evening. or
twerner/mhy
 have time.
 09:48 siretart but how did that happen? is there actually an upload
 with that version?
 09:48 siretart I cannot see in in the mirror on merkel
 09:49 Ganneff no there is not. i would want to look more what
 happened, but you might have just fallen below the
 table when we fixxored up one bug during weekend where
 we simply did that to many packages
 09:50 siretart ah, I understand that in this case, you don't require
 another upload, right?
 09:50 Ganneff not if this can wait until evening
 09:50 Ganneff if you are in a hurry you do want to
 09:51 siretart ok

 
 00:04 Ganneff siretart: 00:04:10 BTS projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-4 uploaded
by
 Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org
 http://packages.qa.debian.org/projectm
 00:04 Ganneff was the same bug that we fixed during the meeting, seems
 your package just fell below us cleaning up

Thanks for making it work again!
Kind regards
   Matthias


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-09-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mi, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:02:05 (CEST), Debian FTP Masters wrote:

 Reject Reasons:
 projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes file already known to dak



 ===

I've asked on #debian-ftp for this:

09:47 siretart I've mailed yesterday, but it seems the mail got lost
09:47 Ganneff (that you didnt get a reply yet doesnt mean lost)
09:47 Ganneff your easiest (fastest) way is to upload something where the 
changes name differs
09:47 Ganneff or, wait until im back home this evening. or twerner/mhy have 
time.
09:48 siretart but how did that happen? is there actually an upload with that 
version?
09:48 siretart I cannot see in in the mirror on merkel
09:49 Ganneff no there is not. i would want to look more what happened, but 
you might have just fallen below the
table when we fixxored up one bug during weekend where we 
simply did that to many packages
09:50 siretart ah, I understand that in this case, you don't require another 
upload, right?
09:50 Ganneff not if this can wait until evening
09:50 Ganneff if you are in a hurry you do want to
09:51 siretart ok

what do we want here?

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-09-21 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On So, Sep 19, 2010 at 23:02:35 (CEST), Debian FTP Masters wrote:

 Reject Reasons:
 projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes file already known to dak



 ===

 Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
 your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
 concerns.

The mirror on merkel still doesn't show this file as known:

siret...@merkel:~$ dak ls projectm
  projectm | 2.0.1+dfsg-3 |   testing | source
  projectm | 2.0.1+dfsg-3 |  unstable | source

Is the mirror on merkel out of date or is there something going
seriously wrong here? Shall I reupload as -5 or -4?

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers