Re: projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes REJECTED
>> 09:47 I've mailed yesterday, but it seems the mail got lost >> 09:47 (that you didnt get a reply yet doesnt mean lost) >> 09:47 your easiest (fastest) way is to upload something where >> the changes name differs >> 09:47 or, wait until im back home this evening. or twerner/mhy >> have time. >> 09:48 but how did that happen? is there actually an upload >> with that version? >> 09:48 I cannot see in in the mirror on merkel >> 09:49 no there is not. i would want to look more what >> happened, but you might have just fallen "below" the >> table when we fixxored up one bug during weekend where >> we simply did that to many packages >> 09:50 ah, I understand that in this case, you don't require >> another upload, right? >> 09:50 not if this can wait until evening >> 09:50 if you are in a hurry you do want to >> 09:51 ok >> > > 00:04 siretart: 00:04:10 projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-4 uploaded by > Matthias Klumpp > http://packages.qa.debian.org/projectm > 00:04 was the same bug that we fixed during the meeting, seems > your package just fell below us cleaning up Thanks for making it work again! Kind regards Matthias ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes REJECTED
On Mi, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:52:19 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Mi, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:02:05 (CEST), Debian FTP Masters wrote: > >> Reject Reasons: >> projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes file already known to dak >> >> >> >> === > > I've asked on #debian-ftp for this: > > 09:47 I've mailed yesterday, but it seems the mail got lost > 09:47 (that you didnt get a reply yet doesnt mean lost) > 09:47 your easiest (fastest) way is to upload something where the > changes name differs > 09:47 or, wait until im back home this evening. or twerner/mhy have > time. > 09:48 but how did that happen? is there actually an upload with > that version? > 09:48 I cannot see in in the mirror on merkel > 09:49 no there is not. i would want to look more what happened, but > you might have just fallen "below" the > table when we fixxored up one bug during weekend where we > simply did that to many packages > 09:50 ah, I understand that in this case, you don't require > another upload, right? > 09:50 not if this can wait until evening > 09:50 if you are in a hurry you do want to > 09:51 ok > 00:04 siretart: 00:04:10 projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-4 uploaded by Matthias Klumpp http://packages.qa.debian.org/projectm 00:04 was the same bug that we fixed during the meeting, seems your package just fell below us cleaning up -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes REJECTED
On Mi, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:02:05 (CEST), Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Reject Reasons: > projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes file already known to dak > > > > === I've asked on #debian-ftp for this: 09:47 I've mailed yesterday, but it seems the mail got lost 09:47 (that you didnt get a reply yet doesnt mean lost) 09:47 your easiest (fastest) way is to upload something where the changes name differs 09:47 or, wait until im back home this evening. or twerner/mhy have time. 09:48 but how did that happen? is there actually an upload with that version? 09:48 I cannot see in in the mirror on merkel 09:49 no there is not. i would want to look more what happened, but you might have just fallen "below" the table when we fixxored up one bug during weekend where we simply did that to many packages 09:50 ah, I understand that in this case, you don't require another upload, right? 09:50 not if this can wait until evening 09:50 if you are in a hurry you do want to 09:51 ok what do we want here? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes REJECTED
On So, Sep 19, 2010 at 23:02:35 (CEST), Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Reject Reasons: > projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-4_i386.changes file already known to dak > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. The mirror on merkel still doesn't show this file as known: siret...@merkel:~$ dak ls projectm projectm | 2.0.1+dfsg-3 | testing | source projectm | 2.0.1+dfsg-3 | unstable | source Is the mirror on merkel out of date or is there something going seriously wrong here? Shall I reupload as -5 or -4? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
