Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 18:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner >>> wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner > wrote: >> >> On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified > version of > the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. > It > is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of > other > ITP'ed packages depend on it. > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary > I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. >>> >>> >>> Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" >>> called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is >>> included >>> in Debian: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright >>> >>> The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more >>> verbose in >>> the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. >> >> >> It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: >> >> http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html > > Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can > generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. >>> >>> The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more >>> delays I updated it myself. >>> Uploaded. >> >> Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates >> to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is >> the easiest way to update the changelog. >> >> Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D >> >> .hc > > Hey Felipe, > > It seems that there was something wrong with the pd-ggee upload, its > complaining about NMU stuff. I'm guessing this is because the changelog has > your name/email at the bottom: > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/pd-ggee_0.26-1.html#source-lintian > > W: pd-ggee source: changelog-should-mention-nmu > W: pd-ggee source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.26-1 Yes, I know. It is not important, though. Next upload should have your name on it (or my name added to Uploaders, depending on how the thing goes). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner > wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner > wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg- multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/ itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more delays I updated it myself. Uploaded. Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is the easiest way to update the changelog. Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D .hc Hey Felipe, It seems that there was something wrong with the pd-ggee upload, its complaining about NMU stuff. I'm guessing this is because the changelog has your name/email at the bottom: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/pd-ggee_0.26-1.html#source-lintian W: pd-ggee source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: pd-ggee source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.26-1 .hc "We have nothing to fear from love and commitment." - New York Senator Diane Savino, trying to convince the NY Senate to pass a gay marriage bill ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner > >> >>> wrote: > >> > >> pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version > >> of > >> the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. > >> It > >> is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of > >> other > >> ITP'ed packages depend on it. > >> > >> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary > >> > >> >>> > >> >>> I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese > >> >>> person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you > >> >>> please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some > >> >>> input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" > >> >> called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is > >> >> included > >> >> in Debian: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright > >> >> > >> >> The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose > >> >> in > >> >> the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. > >> > > >> > > >> > It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: > >> > > >> > http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html > >> > >> Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can > >> generate the appropriate tarball. > > > > Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They > > should be up there now. > > The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more > delays I updated it myself. > Uploaded. Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is the easiest way to update the changelog. Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> > >> > On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner >> >>> wrote: >> >> pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of >> the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It >> is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other >> ITP'ed packages depend on it. >> >> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary >> >> >>> >> >>> I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese >> >>> person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you >> >>> please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some >> >>> input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. >> >> >> >> >> >> Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" >> >> called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is >> >> included >> >> in Debian: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright >> >> >> >> The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in >> >> the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. >> > >> > >> > It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: >> > >> > http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html >> >> Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can >> generate the appropriate tarball. > > Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They > should be up there now. The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more delays I updated it myself. Uploaded. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > >> > >> On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner > >>> wrote: > > pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of > the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It > is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other > ITP'ed packages depend on it. > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary > > >>> > >>> I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese > >>> person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you > >>> please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some > >>> input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. > >> > >> > >> Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" > >> called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is > >> included > >> in Debian: > >> > >> > >> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright > >> > >> The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in > >> the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. > > > > > > It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: > > > > http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html > > Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can > generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> >> On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner >>> wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary >>> >>> I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese >>> person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you >>> please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some >>> input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. >> >> >> Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" >> called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included >> in Debian: >> >> >> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright >> >> The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in >> the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. > > > It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: > > http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg- multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/ itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html .hc 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink- collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg- multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/ itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. .hc I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. - Martin Luther King, Jr. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of > the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It > is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other > ITP'ed packages depend on it. > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary > I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
