On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 17:16:19 (CET), Arnout Engelen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:59:48PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 16:11:25 (CET), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > To me it seems that if we go for a more formal way to hint packages
>> > being ready for release
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:59:48PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 16:11:25 (CET), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > To me it seems that if we go for a more formal way to hint packages
> > being ready for release, then it makes sense to use (parts of) same
> > approach the Perl t
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 16:11:25 (CET), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:26:19PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
>> I wanted to remind you that stretchplayer is, as far as I can see,
>> ready for upload.
>>
>> As I didn't want to nag, but didn't want this package to be forgotten
>
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:11:25PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hmm. If the intend is to maintain an overview of a relatively large
> pile of pending tasks then using usertags seem sensible to me.
>
> But if the intend is to ping DDs then posting to our mailinglist is
> better IMO.
The 'p
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:26:19PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
I wanted to remind you that stretchplayer is, as far as I can see,
ready for upload.
As I didn't want to nag, but didn't want this package to be forgotten
about either, I talked to Reinhard on IRC about a way to keep track.
Using
user pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertags 605256 upload-requested
thanks
Hi,
I wanted to remind you that stretchplayer is, as far as I can see, ready for
upload.
As I didn't want to nag, but didn't want this package to be forgotten about
either, I talked to Reinhard on I
