Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-22 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/11/22 Alberto Luaces : >> I have tried with the other machine, and it built fine. Diff attached >> (I commited to VCS anyway). Since release managers approved with >> those changes enabled, I will go ahead later, but if you have the >> opportunity confirm that it's OK in the meantime, please

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-22 Thread Alberto Luaces
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > 2012/11/22 Alberto Luaces : >>> Failed to build again, it looks like ~7GB isn't enough... will have to >>> make more room to compile or try to grab the beefier machine soon. >> >> Yes, looking at the build tree it says >> >> $ du -sm >> 8079 > > I have tri

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-22 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/11/22 Alberto Luaces : >> Failed to build again, it looks like ~7GB isn't enough... will have to >> make more room to compile or try to grab the beefier machine soon. > > Yes, looking at the build tree it says > > $ du -sm > 8079 I have tried with the other machine, and it built fine. Diff a

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-22 Thread Alberto Luaces
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > 2012/11/21 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo : >> Lastly, I couldn't build it in a beefier machine today at work, but >> I'm trying again now, will tell the result later. > > Failed to build again, it looks like ~7GB isn't enough... will have to > make more ro

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-22 Thread Alberto Luaces
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > Question: in the following paragraphs, ${LINKER_FLAGS} should actually > be ${LDFLAGS}, or am I missing something? Good catch! That was the remaining of a special fix for an older bug with arm's gcc that it's not used currently. I have removed those occu

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-21 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/11/21 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo : > Lastly, I couldn't build it in a beefier machine today at work, but > I'm trying again now, will tell the result later. Failed to build again, it looks like ~7GB isn't enough... will have to make more room to compile or try to grab the beefier machine s

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-21 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/11/21 Alberto Luaces : > "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > >> I asked release managers in the other e-mail, so if they give the >> go-ahead it's better for us. You can defer/avoid investigating >> until/unless they don't want us to use dh level 9. > > Ok. Anyway, I did the test of ch

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-21 Thread Alberto Luaces
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > I asked release managers in the other e-mail, so if they give the > go-ahead it's better for us. You can defer/avoid investigating > until/unless they don't want us to use dh level 9. Ok. Anyway, I did the test of changing debian/compat to "7", and it w

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-21 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/11/21 Alberto Luaces : >> Any clue? Maybe because of the changes of DESTDIR and so on? There >> is no "No space left on device" kind of error, but maybe it's because >> of that (/tmp as tmpfs, and no previous errors for similar >> files/paths). > > I will investigate; in my build, osgdb_seri

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-21 Thread Alberto Luaces
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > 2012/11/20 Alberto Luaces : >> "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: >> >>> 2012/11/19 Alberto Luaces : >> >> [...] >> >>> >>> So, indeed, lintian also shows these warnings for some of my packages ;) >> >> You were right again, in fact I now looked close

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-20 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/11/20 Alberto Luaces : > "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > >> 2012/11/19 Alberto Luaces : > > [...] > >> >> So, indeed, lintian also shows these warnings for some of my packages ;) > > You were right again, in fact I now looked closely to the list of > warning messages and noticed that

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-20 Thread Alberto Luaces
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > 2012/11/19 Alberto Luaces : [...] > > So, indeed, lintian also shows these warnings for some of my packages ;) You were right again, in fact I now looked closely to the list of warning messages and noticed that, for example, libosgDB.so was absent from

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-19 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/11/19 Alberto Luaces : > Ok, I will follow your examples. I had already taken into account that > CMake problem, and in fact I am already adding CPPFLAGS into CFLAGS. > However, if lintian throws those warnings for me and not for you, > something has to be different between those packages. I

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-19 Thread Alberto Luaces
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: [...] Thanks a lot for the pointers. Indeed, I tested my patch and it worked, but as I said, I felt it was too much hacky. I knew that a fresh look at the rules would reveal a much cleaner approach. I had completely forgotten about the target installatio

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-15 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Brr, too many things at this time of the night, hope to get things right this time :-( 2012/11/15 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo : > That is, the "root" of the target system is set to "debian/tmp", the > application is then installed in prefix "/usr" in the target system, > thus "debian/tmp/usr", a

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-15 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/11/15 Alberto Luaces : >> if I remember correctly, there were some problems if one just do as >> suggested in the bug report. Let me check this; I will have an answer >> before the weekend. > > Indeed, there was more than setting the prefix. Doing so places all the > installation products un

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-15 Thread Alberto Luaces
Alberto Luaces Fernández writes: >> Hello, >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690878 >> >> Should we do something about this before the release? I think that >> the prefix should be /usr, I am not sure if it would qualify as an RC >> bug and a new version would be accepted at

Re: [Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-14 Thread Alberto Luaces Fernández
> Hello, > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690878 > > Should we do something about this before the release? I think that > the prefix should be /usr, I am not sure if it would qualify as an RC > bug and a new version would be accepted at this point, but I think > that it's feas

[Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"

2012-11-14 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hello, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690878 Should we do something about this before the release? I think that the prefix should be /usr, I am not sure if it would qualify as an RC bug and a new version would be accepted at this point, but I think that it's feasible. Cheers.