[DRE-maint] Bug#1041840: ruby-babosa: please make the build reproducible

forwarded 1041840 https://github.com/norman/babosa/pull/74 thanks I've forwarded this upstream here: https://github.com/norman/babosa/pull/74 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

[DRE-maint] Bug#1041840: ruby-babosa: please make the build reproducible

attribute. A patch is attached that moves the assignment of cert_chain to match the conditional of signing_key, thereby excluding it from the binary package and thus making the package reproducible. [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/ Regards, -- ,''`. : :' :

[DRE-maint] Bug#1037178: puppet does not sync files anymore after recent ruby2.5 security upload

No, please go ahead and do both: my availability is spotty for the next 18 hours. :) (on mobile) Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:01 PM Chris Lamb wrote: >> I see your 2.5.5-3+deb10u6 update on the debian/buster branch which >> fixes the b

[DRE-maint] Bug#1037178: puppet does not sync files anymore after recent ruby2.5 security upload

gh you mentioned you were going to wait a bit more, I'm just 100%-checking you aren't waiting on anything from me to upload that? Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk `- _

[DRE-maint] Bug#1034147: ruby-regexp-parser: please make the build reproducible

lude the -L argument that suppresses these additions. [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/ Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- --- a/debian/patches/reproducible-build.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 --- b/debian/

Re: [DRE-maint] Upload of src:ruby-websocket-extensions to stable-proposed-updates.

s as #988454 and my fork is available at: https://salsa.debian.org/lamby/ruby-websocket-extensions Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mail

[DRE-maint] Upload of src:ruby-websocket-extensions to stable-proposed-updates.

like to handle this yourself? Either way, please let me know. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@al

[DRE-maint] Bug#882580: ruby-mmap2: please make the build reproducible

Chris Lamb wrote: > [..] Friendly ping on this? Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@ali

[DRE-maint] Bug#972668: yard: please make the build reproducible

Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- --- a/debian/rules 2020-10-22 10:00:45.132192197 +0100 --- b/debian/rules 2020-10-22 10:03:28.029886499 +0100 @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ override_dh_auto_install: dh_auto_install +

[DRE-maint] Bug#972561: ruby-appraiser: please make the build reproducible

s attached that removes the file from the binary artefact. [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/ Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- --- a/debian/rules 2020-10-20 10:55:41.195010332 +0100 --- b/debian/rules

[DRE-maint] Bug#882580: ruby-mmap2: please make the build reproducible

Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ru

[DRE-maint] Bug#964772: gem2deb: should not install mkmf.log files

g my patch. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debia

[DRE-maint] Bug#964772: gem2deb: should not install mkmf.log files

not appear to be working. Patch attached, although this is just a proof of concept and/or to demonstrate the problem a little more. [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/ Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-diff --git

[DRE-maint] Bug#956405: ruby-enumerable-statistics: FTBFS on amd64/unstable: find: [..] No such file or directory

/rules:7: binary] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2 […] The full build log is attached. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ruby-enumerable-statistics.2.0.1

[DRE-maint] Bug#923986: ruby-pygments.rb: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

my brief status update earlier. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://a

[DRE-maint] Bug#923986: ruby-pygments.rb: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

abling that one or (better) explicitly marking it as XFAIL. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@

[DRE-maint] Bug#882473: ruby-httpclient FTBFS and Debci failure: test_verification_without_httpclient fails

Hi, > ruby-httpclient FTBFS and Debci failure: test_verification_without_httpclient > fails This is likely another OpenSSL 1.1 incompatibility wrt. SHA1 signatures. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb

[DRE-maint] Bug#890075: ruby-http ftbfs (test failures with 2.5)

notfound 890075 3.3.0-2 thanks Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Note that the bug is not reproducible with ruby-http 3.3.0-2 as tests > have been disabled Therefore marking in the BTS to match. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org  chris-lamb

[DRE-maint] Bug#848660: ruby: might need to strip -fdebug-prefix-map

Hi Christian, > dpkg-buildflags has started injecting -fdebug-prefix-map with a > variable path into C(..)FLAGS. We need to figure out if we need to > strip that. Strip it? As in, the output of CFLAGS ends up in the build...? Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : C

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-blade-sauce-labs-plugin_0.7.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Please try and make your short description more ... descriptive: 28 Description: Blade Runner plugin for Sauce Labs (saucelabs.com) ^ This makes no sense for the "average" developer, even with a passing usage of Ruby, alas. :) -- Chris Lamb Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:1

[DRE-maint] Bug#913093: ruby-i18n: CVE-2014-10077

block 913093 by 914187 thanks Hi Moritz, > This doesn't warrant a DSA, feel free to fix it via a point > update, though! Thanks, filed as #914187. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb

[DRE-maint] Bug#913005: ruby-rack: CVE-2018-16471: Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack

block 913005 by 914184 thanks Hi Salvatore, > I think those will be no-dsa and can be adressed via a point release Thanks, filed as: #914184. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co

[DRE-maint] Bug#913093: ruby-i18n: CVE-2014-10077

Chris Lamb wrote: > Security team, I would be more than happy to prepare and upload a > stable security upload of this package when addressing it in jessie > LTS. Please let me know and I will come back with a debdiff. > > Ruby team, I could easily upload to sid at the same time

[DRE-maint] Bug#913005: ruby-rack: CVE-2018-16471: Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack

Chris Lamb wrote: > Security team, like ruby-i18n, I would be more than happy to prepare > and upload a stable security upload of this package when addressing > it in jessie LTS. […] > Ruby team, again, I could easily upload to sid at the same time. Let > me know here to

[DRE-maint] Bug#913005: ruby-rack: CVE-2018-16471: Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack

will come back with a debdiff. Ruby team, again, I could easily upload to sid at the same time. Let me know here too. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ru

[DRE-maint] Bug#913093: ruby-i18n: CVE-2014-10077

time. Let me know too. (I believe I have the requisite powers in Salsa already.) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing li

[DRE-maint] ruby-graphiql-rails_1.4.10-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

app/assets/javascripts/graphiql/rails/graphiql-0.11.11.js has more copyright holders than you list. Indeed, it looks like a concatentation of a bunch of libraries. -- Chris Lamb Wed, 07 Nov 2018 08:49:55 + === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your

[DRE-maint] ruby-graphiql-rails_1.4.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

app/assets/javascripts/graphiql/rails/graphiql-0.11.11.js contains more copyright holders than you list; indeed, it looks like a concatentation of different libraries. -- Chris Lamb Wed, 07 Nov 2018 08:50:33 + === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why

Re: [DRE-maint] gitlab_10.7.7+dfsg-1_amd64.changes is NEW

ny security bugs against gitlab. Done. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.d

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-em-websocket_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes

Just wondering if the conditional for: 3 ifeq ($(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES)),) 4 export GEM2DEB_TEST_RUNNER = --check-dependencies 5 endif .. is necessary given that you do the real nocheck check later. /lamby ___

[DRE-maint] Bug#897664: ruby-rjb: FTBFS: make[2]: javah: Command not found

forwarded 897664 https://github.com/arton/rjb/pull/63 thanks I've forwarded this upstream here: https://github.com/arton/rjb/pull/63 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

[DRE-maint] Bug#897664: ruby-rjb: FTBFS: make[2]: javah: Command not found

: […] dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc -ui -b dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package ruby-rjb dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 1.5.5-2 dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> dpkg-

[DRE-maint] Bug#874146: FTBFS with Java 9: all tests fail

Chris Lamb wrote: > Patch attached. I intend to NMU this package. May I be granted access to ruby-team on salsa.debian.org so I can push my changes and, if you wish, "Team upload" instead? I have requested access on salsa.debian.org itself. I will update/refresh the packaging at