Hi,
I investigated this a little bit. The problem occurs during this call:
lambda { BCrypt::Password.create(nil) }.should_not
raise_error(BCrypt::Errors::InvalidSecret)
in the password_spec.rb test file.
It seems that the value (10) of the BCrypt::Engine::DEFAULT_COST constant
is to high (at
Hi!
I prepared a new version of ruby-markaby package, and pushed it to the
repository.
I used the copyright information in the old libmarkaby-ruby, but I found
no license/copyright info in the gem or in the homepage. I contacted
upstream (first via email, then via github) but no answer so far.
Dear Luca,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:04:40PM +, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi,
> quoting your copyright file for lib/pdf/reader/glyphlist.txt:
> - No modification, editing or other alteration of this document is allowed
> This fails DFSG #3, thus it is unsuitable for main.
The license has two
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 01:51:40PM -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Luca Falavigna escreveu isso aí:
> > Il 14/09/2011 22:48, Cédric Boutillier ha scritto:
> > > The license has two paragraphs, and authorizes distribution in one of
> > > the two following cases:
> &
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:26:07AM -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> > There exists a file with the same name and content, but with a more
> > permissive license, already packaged for Debian in the package 'aglfn'.
> > (There
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Martin Ueding wrote:
> I just include the tests in ruby-mustache since ruby-contest is
> available in unstable now.
> One of the tests fails with Ruby 1.9.1 though, so the package cannot be
> build.
> The bug is reported [upstream][1].
> Should I just wa
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 12:33:20AM +0200, Martin Ueding wrote:
> That looks promising, I created a debian/patches/fix-encoding, but it
> does not seem to get applied -- or it does not do any good.
> The error seems to be the same.
> This is the file that I created: http://paste.ubuntu.com/704642
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:18:40PM +0200, Martin Ueding wrote:
> Okay, I generated the debian/patches/series file and use quilt. The
> crazy thing is that now the test-pwd patch does not correct it any more,
> I now again get
> /usr/bin/ruby1.8 -I/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ru
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 08:20:43PM +0200, Martin Ueding wrote:
> For me, it does not work without the patch. I changed the patch to
> include lib/mustache.rb and all the tests succeed on my Unstable VM. The
> changes are pushed to master.
> Can we build and upload this now?
I really believe that
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:08:32PM +0100, Martin Ueding wrote:
> I subscribed to the the bug, using my d...@martin-ueding.de though. Or do
> you mean something else?
You should have put 646...@bugs.debian.org in the Cc: field.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:25:05AM +0100, Martin Ueding wrote:
> > ruby-rdiscount was designed to be distributed by ruby gems as far as I
> > understand the upstream project page. Therefore, I assume that this
> > would have
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Martin Ueding wrote:
> I just cloned the rdiscount git repo, and in
> 54da94bd495fb08fdedaeb9f64d604ea91c5cc66, there is
>
> exp = %(\n Level 1\n \n
> Level 2\n \n)
>
>
> So there is the one with the period, not with a plus sign. If I read
> your test output cor
Source: libopengl-ruby
Severity: wishlist
I am taking care of this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Local
tags 654985 pending
thanks
Hi!
I propose to exclude all tests requiring an access to the network, with
the following patch, which is already in the repository.
Thanks!
Best wishes,
Cédric
diff --git a/debian/ruby-tests.rb b/debian/ruby-tests.rb
index bc13ba3..a063009 100644
--- a/debia
tags 665251 fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Hi!
This bug is due to some internal changes in RSpec >= 2.8.0.
Upstream already fixed this [0]. The patch has been imported in the team
repository.
0:
https://github.com/jasonwebster/treetop/commit/754aa988cf3a16cbb5606fffa1b1ea42c2d3e1a4
signature
Dear Ansgar,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:34:59AM +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> I have to reject the package: examples/misc/fbo_test.rb doesn't allow
> distributing modified versions and the source for ext/common/gl-enums.h and
> ext/{common,glu}/glu-enums.c seems to be missing (it is generated
reopen 670826
thanks
Hi again!
It seems I closed this bug too quickly. Even though the name matches the
requirements of the new policy, the Ruby files are still installed in
the wrong location. It should use rubyvendordir variable, instead of
rubylibdir. So this package still needs to complete it
reassign 672714 ruby-datamapper
tag 672714 pending
thanks
Hi!
The problem comes from a little bit further in the building process. One
of the tests run during build time, and using files from ruby-datamapper
fails because it takes more than 2 seconds on these architectures to run
some commands.
tag 626984 upstream
forwarded 626984 https://github.com/rdp/ruby_gnuplot/issues/12
thanks
Hi!
Thank you for your report. One part of your patch (about the smooth
attribute) has already been included upstream. I've forwarded the second
part to the github public page of the project, which seems to
reassign 673738 ruby-validatable
affects 673738 ruby-dust
tag 673738 pending
thanks
Hi!
I am moving, in the ruby-validatable package, the file causing problems,
as well as other secondary Ruby files in the
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/validatable
subdirectory to solve this name clash.
The same pro
Source: ruby-image-science
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
Attempts to build the package from source yield an error message and the
build fails.
Here is the relevant part of the build:
Rewriting shebang line of
/tmp/buildd/ruby-image-science-1.2.2/debian/ru
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
Please remove libsdl-ruby source package from unstable. It is obsoleted by
ruby-sdl, which provides transitional packages for all binary packaged
built from it. libsdl-ruby is preventing the migration of ruby-sdl into
testing.
Thanks!
Cédric
signat
orrectly with the various Ruby interpreter.
+ * Add 9900_debug_test_failures.patch
+ Make the test suite output more verbose, to get enough info if something
+ goes wrong during the build.
+ * Bump Standards-Version: to 3.9.3 (no changes needed)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:34
fixed 670766 1.4.3-3
thanks
Hi!
Thank you for proposing this patch. The conversion of this package to
source format 3.0 (quilt) has been achieved during its transition to the
new Ruby policy. The version currently in the archive uses this format.
I am therefore closing this bug report.
With my b
is the
+ case in the test suite (Closes:#676206)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Fri, 06 Jul 2012 06:03:30 +0200
+
ruby-gruff (0.3.6-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Added missing dependency and build-dependency on ruby-rmagick
diff -Nru ruby-gruff-0.3.6/debian/patches/fix_division_by_0 ruby-gruff-0.3.6/debian/pat
package ruby-gettext
tag 682543 pending
thanks
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:56:00PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> So how about:
> Description: gettext for Ruby
> This Ruby package is a localization library and toolset modeled after
> GNU gettext, and with a similar simple API.
> .
> I
g tests to fail (Closes: #684860).
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:29:15 +0200
+
ruby-mocha (0.11.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Bump the build-dependency on gem2deb to >= 0.3.0~ (closes: #674388).
diff -Nru ruby-mocha-0.11.3/debian/patches/remove_rubygems_stuff_in_minitest_tes
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 10:12:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Indeed. It fails with ruby-mocha 0.11.3, but works with 0.10.3 and
> 0.10.5.
> I'm not very familiar with ruby-mocha, so I don't know if the package is
> actually doing something wrong. Could someone in debian-ruby@ take a
> closer
Hi!
This package is to be removed from unstable, since it has been renamed
in ruby-zoom. The removal is requested in Bug 687790.
Cheers,
Cédric
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://li
Package: ruby-libxml
Version: 2.3.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #676210
Control: reassign -1 libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-5
Control: affects -1 ruby-libxml
Control: retitle -1 xmlreader fails to report parsing failures, causing
ruby-libxml test failure
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi!
As documented in the upstream bug
Package: ruby-net-sftp
Followup-For: Bug #674324
Hi!
I investigated this a little bit further. Here are my findings so far.
There is a kind of conflict between two tests:
- test_from_buffer_should_correctly_parse_buffer_and_return_attribute_object
from test/protocol/04/test_attributes.rb
- test
Package: ruby-net-sftp
Followup-For: Bug #674324
Control: clone 674324 -1
Control: reassign -1 ruby-mocha
Control: affects -1 ruby-net-sftp
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/freerange/mocha/issues/99
Hi!
This turns out to be a variant of a problem in ruby-mocha,
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: retitle -1 ruby-diff-lcs needs to be rebuilt against gem2deb>=0.3.0
Hi!
Thanks for your report.
Integration of Ruby Debian packages with rubygems arrived late in the
release cycle for Wheezy, but it requires rebuilding the packages with
newer gem2deb (>= 0.3.0
Hi!
Instead of requiring rubygems, wouldn't be better to circumvent rubygems
instructions in config/boot? All the dependencies are already ensured to
be installed thanks to APT, so there is no need for extra checks to be
sure that rails is installed.
_
Hi,
I can confirm that the command 'yard server' is not working as expected.
The webrick server throws a lot of 404 errors on the command line.
However, if using the '--docroot doc/' options, everything seems to work
as expected, with all the interactivity JavaScript libraries could
offer.
(the w
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ruby1.9.1
Hi!
Reading the description given in
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/rubyonrails-security/4_YvCpLzL58
I notice that the bug is affecting the version of JSON distributed with
ruby1.9.1. I am therefore duplicating this bug acco
).
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:02:31 +0100
+
libopenid-ruby (2.1.8debian-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Lucas Nussbaum ]
diff -Nru libopenid-ruby-2.1.8debian/debian/patches/fix_CVE-2013-1812
libopenid-ruby-2.1.8debian/debian/patches/fix_CVE-2013-1812
--- libopenid-ruby-2.1.8debian
Hi!
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:00:07PM +1200, Francois Marier wrote:
> Perhaps if this was broken for everyone, it should be submitted as a stable
> release update for jessie?
According to
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ruby-kramdown
ruby-kramdown/1.4.2-2 is the version shipped with Jessie. I
Package: ruby-pdf-core
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: rspec3
Dear maintainer,
This package uses the RSpec framework for the tests. RSpec v2 currently in
unstable will soon be replaced by the v3, already present in e
Package: ruby-powerpack
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: rspec3
Dear maintainer,
This package uses the RSpec framework for the tests. RSpec v2 currently in
unstable will soon be replaced by the v3, already present in experimental.
Ma
Package: ruby-six
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: rspec3
Dear maintainer,
This package uses the RSpec framework for the tests. RSpec v2 currently in
unstable will soon be replaced by the v3, already present in experimental.
Many dep
Package: ruby-redcloth
Version: 4.2.9-4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: rspec3
Dear maintainer,
This package uses the RSpec framework for the tests. RSpec v2 currently in
unstable will soon be replaced by the v3, already present in e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
Control: block 784424 by -1
* Package name: ruby-power-assert
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Kazuki Tsujimoto
* URL : https://github.com/k-tsj/power_assert
* License : BSD-2-clause
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: ruby-nokogumbo
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Sam Ruby
* URL : https://github.com/rubys/nokogumbo/#readme
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
non existing files.
Cheers,
Cédric
Description: do not modify the load path or try to load non existing files
we remove everything relying on the layout of the gem, not the installed
packaged
Author: Cédric Boutillier
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/789585
Last-Update: 2015-06-22
--- a/bin
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear FTP masters,
please remove ruby-opengl from the archive. This project is dead
upstream, and does not work with newer version of Ruby. It has no
reverse dependency.
Thanks in advance,
Cédric
___
Pkg-ruby-e
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 06:00:07PM +, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote:
> CC-BY-SA 2.5 is not DFSG free. Please see if upstream will
> relicense to 3.0 or 4.0
Thanks for your message. I've contacted the upstream author about this
issue.
https://github.com/minad/mimemagic/issues/22
Hi,
This is affecting packages (build)depending on pry, including
cucumber. Since ruby-slop has a unique dependency/build-dependency (pry)
and upstream is not ready yet to upgrade to the v4 of ruby-slop (which
seems to be a complete rewrite), can we reupload the 3.6.0 version, with
a 4.2.0+really3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:12:08 +0100
Source: yard
Binary: yard yard-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 05:33:29 +0100
Source: ruby-saml
Binary: ruby-saml
Architecture: source
Version: 1.7.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:20:44 +0100
Source: ruby-mini-magick
Binary: ruby-mini-magick
Architecture: source
Version: 4.8.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric
Hi Federico,
Thank you for your additional comment on this bug.
I don't think it is the same problem as in the original report. The
error you see in irb comes from the fact that you run your session in a
directory which doesn't contain a Gemfile to describe the dependencies
of your project. In pa
Hi,
when checking why empty blocks were appearing, I found
that pygments are including them on purpose so that empty new lines are
not ignored by the HTML parser.
See
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/pygments-main/src/176329bf17a98677643a935fb6ef5b1d0c88aeb6/pygments/formatters/html.py?at=defaul
Package: ruby-grape-entity
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
ruby-grape fails to build because of failing tests. The autopackage
tests for ruby-grape started to fail when ruby-grape-entity 0.5.1-1 was
introduced.
Using version 0.5.0-1 instead to build ruby-grape results in a
Package: ruby-grape
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
Since the presence of ruby-grape-entity 0.5.1-1 in the archive, ruby-grape
0.5.0-1 has failing tests, resulting in a failing build.
Failures:
Hi!
I noticed that this package has no repository on Alioth in the Ruby
team. Could you please push the Git repo to the team infrastructure?
I could also this weekend start a new one by importing the existing .dsc
package.
Cheers,
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Hi,
It seems you are running jessie.
Can you tell me to which version of the jekyll package it applies?
Currently, the version in testing/unstable depends on ruby-jekyll-watch,
which installs the ruby-listen and ruby-rb-inotify.
Thanks
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Package: ruby-state-machine
Followup-For: Bug #827834
This gem is indicated as obsolete, see:
https://github.com/pluginaweek/state_machine/issues/343
the only reverse dependency ruby-eye has been patched to use a
maintained fork, ruby-state-machines, already in the archive.
This bug is not wort
reassign 833788 ruby-kramdown
thanks
Hi Ryan,
I think I found a solution:
replace HTML by LegacyHTML on line 30 of
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/kramdown/converter/syntax_highlighter/rouge.rb.
I am reassigning this bug to ruby-kramdown. The next upload will contain
this fix.
Cédric
signature.asc
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:09:49PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> replace HTML by LegacyHTML on line 30 of
This is of course HTMLLegacy... sorry for the typo.
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mail
Thanks for the report. I am investigating this bug.
Cheers,
Cédric
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Thanks for the report. I am investigating this bug.
Cheers,
Cédric
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Hi,
The corresponding removal bug has been filed. See:
bugs.debian.org/862537
Best wishes,
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.
0
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ruby-httparty (0.13.7-1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+ * Relax dependency version in gem dependency on json.
+This fixes loading httparty with the gem command (Closes: #864723)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Sat, 25 Nov 2017 00:30:18 +0100
+
ruby-httparty (0.13.7-1) unstabl
mit-to-RLIMIT_NOFILE.patch
+to avoid closing too many files when mentos starts
+(Closes: #876768)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Sat, 25 Nov 2017 21:48:18 +0100
+
ruby-pygments.rb (0.6.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload
diff -Nru ruby-pygments.rb-0.6.3/debian/gbp.conf
ruby-py
ix CVE-2017-15928: segmentation fault in parse_obj
+(Closes: #881445)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Sun, 26 Nov 2017 01:08:40 +0100
+
ruby-ox (2.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru ruby-ox-2.1.1/debian/gbp.conf ruby-ox-2.1.1/debian/gbp.conf
--- ruby-ox-2.1.1/debian/gbp.conf
Control: retitle -1 test using GCM with IV option fails after fix for
CVE-2016-7798
Hi,
Checking when the package stopped to pass autopkgtests, I could trace
the issue to the fix of #842432 in ruby2.3 to avoid IV reuse in GCM
mode. The title of the failing test
test_ciphertext_encrypted_with_
12:58:15.0 +0200
+++ ruby-ox-2.1.1/debian/changelog 2017-11-26 01:08:40.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+ruby-ox (2.1.1-2+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload
+ * Add fix_parse_obj_segfault.patch picked from upstream
++ fix CVE-2017-15928: segmentation fault
Hi,
I could not reproduce the attack. The ruby2.3 interpreter in Debian
received a patch preventing SMTP command injections
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864860
So this package used in conjunction with the Debian version of the ruby
interpreter in stretch or unstable/testing
)
+
+ -- Cédric Boutillier Fri, 01 Dec 2017 17:22:29 +0100
+
ruby-redis-store (1.1.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Upstream update
diff -Nru ruby-redis-store-1.1.6/debian/patches/CVE-2017-1000248.patch
ruby-redis-store-1.1.6/debian/patches/CVE-2017-1000248.patch
--- ruby-redis-store-1.1.6/debian
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:31:47AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
> Thanks a lot for fixing this in unstable and experimental, so we have
> quarantee that it's fixed in next stable. For stretch: Can you fix the
> issue via a point release?
Sure. It is too late for the one
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Lucas,
I can't reproduce this issue on my system.
As I understand from the code, this could arise if the site you want to
build with jekyll contains a Gemfile. Then Bundler is set up, and the
error seems to be related to dependency problems of your gems.
Is this occur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 22:27:09 +0100
Source: ruby-oj
Binary: ruby-oj
Architecture: source
Version: 3.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier
Description
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier
Description:
ruby-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby - metapackage
ruby-rspec-core - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby - core
ruby-rspec-expectations - Behaviour Driven Development
Source: ruby-grape
Version: 0.16.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Dear Maintainer,
The version 0.16.2-2 fails to build with ruby2.3. According to
ci.debian.net, this has been happening since Sept, 7 2018
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/r/ruby-g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 17:22:29 +0100
Source: ruby-redis-store
Binary: ruby-redis-store
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.6-1+deb9u1
Distribution: stretch
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric
ruby-all-dev (Closes: #889470)
* dh_ruby --print-supported: respect order provided by ruby-all-dev
.
[ Cédric Boutillier ]
* gem2tgz:
- Deprecate SHA1, and replace by SHA256
- Ensure that at least one of the checkable digests is listed in
checksums.yaml.gz instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:48:25 +0100
Source: ruby-safe-yaml
Binary: ruby-safe-yaml
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier
: Cédric Boutillier
Description:
ruby-fakeweb - tool for faking responses to HTTP requests
Closes: 888124
Changes:
ruby-fakeweb (1.3.0+git20170806+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 1.3.0+git20170806+dfsg1
+ Fix compatibility with Ruby 2.5 (Closes: #888124)
+ Drop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:36:46 +0100
Source: ruby-mustermann
Binary: ruby-mustermann
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:24:08 +0100
Source: ruby-delayed-job
Binary: ruby-delayed-job
Architecture: source
Version: 4.1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier
Description:
ruby-delayed-job-active-record - ActiveRecord backend for DelayedJob
Changes:
ruby-delayed-job-active-record (4.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload
* New upstream version 4.1.2
* Use https in watch file and copyright format and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:04:10 +0100
Source: bundler
Binary: ruby-bundler bundler
Architecture: source
Version: 1.16.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 08:06:19PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> >> ruby-redcarpet differ by minor version. Since its ruby 2.2 tests are
> >> failing I need help updating it.
> >
> > Did you resolve the rudy-redcarpet issue?
> >
> Nopes, upstream closed the issue saying its debian specific.
> h
I meant #816324
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear FTP masters,
Please remove ruby-rspec-longrun from the archive. It doesn't work with
new ruby-rspec, and seems dead upstream.
It has no reverse dependency, and its only reverse build-dependency,
ruby-nmatrix, currently only in experimental, just drop
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear FTP masters,
Could you please remove mdpress from the archive? It is unmaintained
upstream, and completely broken with the current (and future) version(s)
of ruby-redcarpet. It has no reverse dependencies and low popcon score.
Thanks in advance
Cédr
Package: ruby-jeweler
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: cannot work without the correct dependencies
Hi!
Checking the Gemfile and the require statements contained in the files
of this package, I see that some dependencies are missing (and are even
not packaged): ruby-git and ruby-
Package: ruby-cocoon
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
The tests cannot be run correctly for the moments as the dependencies
for the test application are not all present. Disabling the tests for
now. Please reenable when everything is in place.
Cheers,
Cédric
__
Hi!
I have just tested in Konsole and xterm, and for me, it was working as
expected. If I run "lolcat file.txt", it displays the content of the
file with nice colors, and if I just do "lolcat", then it behaves like
cat, and repeats the lines entered in the standard input (only with
colors), and en
Hi Jonas,
I'm fine with this change. Thanks!
Cheers,
Cédric___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Package: ruby-ffi-rzmq
Version: 1.0.3+metadata-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When running
require "ffi-rzmq"
I see the following error:
LoadError: The libzmq version 4.0.4 is incompatible with ffi-rzmq.
It seems according to the README that the version 1.0.3 works only w
Package: ruby-backports
Followup-For: Bug #738380
Hi,
this transitional bug was caused by a problem with
ruby-activesupport-3.2 3.16-2, which has been solved since then with the
upload of rails-3.2 3.2.16-3+0.
Therefore this bug can be closed.
Cedric
___
Dear Gergely,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:00:06PM +, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
> Your upload of github-markup has been rejected, because it goes
> against the recommended naming policy, which recommends a ruby-$FOO
> scheme, unless the package in question is an application, and n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: ruby-omniauth-github
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Michael Bleigh
* URL : https://github.com/intridea/omniauth-github
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
D
Package: rubygems-integration
Version: 1.6
Severity: important
Hi,
Running gem2.1 list does not show any gemspec for arch specific Ruby
libraries installed as a Debian package, despite the fact that the
gemspec are installed in /usr/share/rubygems-integration/2.1.
The problem is that rubygems-in
Package: ruby-escape-utils
Followup-For: Bug #746379
Hi Praveen,
Since rack seems to be used explicitly only in benchmarks, which are not
run anyway, and given that ruby-actionpack will eventually pull
ruby-rack1.4, I would remove ruby-rack from the Build-Depends field.
Cheers,
Cédric
signatu
Hi Axel,
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:26:00AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: ruby-fog,ruby-fog-core
> Version: ruby-fog-core/1.21.1+gh-1
> Version: ruby-fog/1.22.0-1
> Severity: serious
> This is a very similar issue to https://bugs.debian.org/744010 but with
> a different file:
> Selecting
Package: ruby-heckle
Followup-For: Bug #747733
This bug is not specific to ruby2.1. According to its metadata file,
ruby-heckle requires ruby-parser at version 2.3.1. Its source code
relies on the :scope kind of nodes provided by ruby-parser in that
version.
But ruby-parser 3.0 dropped support fo
Package: ruby-escape-utils
Followup-For: Bug #746379
As an additional note, sbuild and apt-get build-dep can both correctly
satisfy dependencies.
Anyway, since dropping ruby-rack from the build-dependency line still
yields a succesful build, I am uploading a new version without the
ruby-rack buil
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
