On 07/02/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 17:23, schrieb
VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS:
On 07/02/2014 05:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Never saw a warning and never failed to install anything!
I checked the
test is there in 208 too
Am 03.07.2014 09:09, schrieb VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS:
Sorry this was not clear, I have just checked the scripts works and I did on
kernel that had the CONFIG_FHANDLE already. So I do not understand why I
never
saw a warning.
Most likely the version you installed did not have this check.
It
Am 03.07.2014 12:33, schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 03.07.2014 09:09, schrieb VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS:
Sorry this was not clear, I have just checked the scripts works and I did on
kernel that had the CONFIG_FHANDLE already. So I do not understand why I
never
saw a warning.
Most likely the
Am 02.07.2014 16:15, schrieb VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS:
So we are probably hunting a kernel/systemd dependency that is not
listed in the page I indicated.
Or I should go back to school and take a reading course :-(
CONFIG_FHANDLE was not set on my Kernel (in the meantime I also upgraded
from
On 07/02/2014 05:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Thanks Eric, keep us posted.
We already have a list of required kernel features we check for in
udev.preinst [1].
We do have a check for open_by_handle_at(2) (CONFIG_FHANDLE). So I'm
surprised this check didn't work for you.
Which version of
Am 02.07.2014 17:23, schrieb VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS:
On 07/02/2014 05:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Never saw a warning and never failed to install anything! I checked the
test is there in 208 too and it is.
I even did extract the code and tested it:
needed_symbols='inotify_init signalfd
