Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] [INFO] Re: [INFO] Re: Can aolserver4 be considered superseded and removed?

El mié, 14-03-2018 a las 16:24 +0300, Sergei Golovan escribió: > Hi Francesco, > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine > wrote: > > > > I noticed that current naviserver package still declare a quite > > obsolete > > policy version. Is there any good

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] [INFO] Re: [INFO] Re: Can aolserver4 be considered superseded and removed?

El mié, 14-03-2018 a las 14:16 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine escribió: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:18:58PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine > wrote: > > I will have a look to the naviserver package. Basically I would > > upload > > as naviserver, then at a certain point it could start providing  > >

[Pkg-tcltk-devel] [Fwd: naviserver_4.99.16-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]

Hi Sergei, I have already added the copyright section for nsd/tclxkeylist.c. Not sure about the other copyright holder warning, should i put the contributors mentioned in the license body in the Copyright section? In any case, will have a look tomorrow to the files, and see if i can find any

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] [RFU] Naviserver

Hi Sergei, > > ...so i have removed  "Multi-Arch: same" from naviserver-dev in the > > control file, for the time being. > > I would also suggest to move the primary location of the2 include > directory > to /usr/lib//naviserver/include and create two > symlinks: > /usr/include/naviserver ->

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] [RFU] Naviserver

Hi Sergei, > > > * there are many Makefiles inside/usr/share/naviserver/include. > > > Please, get rid of them. Or they are useful in some way? > > > > Some of them are sourced by other naviserver modules, that will > > form > > part of the naviserver-modules package. > > > > For instance,

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Can aolserver4 be considered superseded and removed?

El mar, 27-02-2018 a las 17:36 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine escribió: > [...] > > I would suggest to provide a migration package for AOLserver users > with a NEWS document about possible issues due to known problems. Agree. I will make openacs dependant on naviserver in the next version, once

[Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#891650: ITP: naviserver-modules -- Modules for the NaviServer webserver

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Pkg-tcltk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org    Package name: naviserver-modules Version: 4.99.16 Upstream Author: Vlad Seryakov, Stephen Deasey,  Steve Ball, Zoran Vasiljevic, Gustaf Neumann URL:

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Team migration (alioth -> salsa)

Hi, El vie, 23-02-2018 a las 16:20 +0300, Sergei Golovan escribió: > Hi Hector! > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Héctor Romojaro Gómez > <hector.romoj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I have just migrated one of the svn repositories (

[Pkg-tcltk-devel] [RFU] Naviserver

Dear all, I would like to ask for a first upload of the naviserver package to sid. It is currently on a git repository generated using gbp, on salsa.debian.org[1]. It should build straightforward after pulling the repository. $ gbp buildpackage As a DM i would only need a sponsor for the first

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Team migration (alioth -> salsa)

Dear all, I have just migrated one of the svn repositories (tdom) to git, so far so good. As "Master" role is required to create new repos in salsa, i just created it in alioth, moving it to salsa should be easy afterwards. The repo is here[1], and for svn to git migration i used a similar

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Team migration (alioth -> salsa)

Also, regarding list migration, there is a deadline on 15th March for automatic migration: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2018/01/msg3.html Kind regards, Héctor El jue, 22-02-2018 a las 20:02 +0100, Héctor Romojaro Gómez escribió: > Dear all, > > Not sure

[Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#856961: nsf: can't find package xotcl::serializer

After reinstalling again, the duplicity is gone, most probably a local issue. The issue with "package req xotcl::serializer" persists, though. Kind regards, Héctor signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pkg-tcltk-devel

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Naviserver package

Ping! El mié, 04-11-2015 a las 13:33 +0100, Héctor Romojaro Gómez escribió: > Hi, > > I plan on start packaging NaviServer[1]. I have already filed the ITP > bug[2], and i will use current's aolserver package and the work from the > Qcode team[3] on this subject as

[Pkg-tcltk-devel] Naviserver package

Hi, I plan on start packaging NaviServer[1]. I have already filed the ITP bug[2], and i will use current's aolserver package and the work from the Qcode team[3] on this subject as an inspiration for it. As i am just a DM, i can't upload packages to the NEW queue, so i will need someone to do it