On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:34 PM Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Daniele
>
> Am 09.07.2018 um 01:45 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi:
> > my attempt to implement user service management in init-system-helpers
> > and debhelper unfortunately stalled by lack of review of the
> > init-system-helper patches. Before
Hi Daniele
Am 09.07.2018 um 01:45 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi:
> my attempt to implement user service management in init-system-helpers
> and debhelper unfortunately stalled by lack of review of the
> init-system-helper patches. Before I loose all interest, how do prefer
> to solve the issue of user
On 29/05/2018 11:39, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 29.05.2018 um 19:30 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi:
>> What would it take to have user services managed in a similar way as
>> system services? Should I look into implementing that in
>> init-system-helpers or should a new dh helper be created?
>
>
> It w
On 29/05/2018 11:39, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 29.05.2018 um 19:30 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi:
>> What would it take to have user services managed in a similar way as
>> system services? Should I look into implementing that in
>> init-system-helpers or should a new dh helper be created?
>
>
> It w
On 29/05/2018 10:39, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 29.05.2018 um 19:30 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi:
>> What would it take to have user services managed in a similar way as
>> system services? Should I look into implementing that in
>> init-system-helpers or should a new dh helper be created?
>
>
> It w
Am 29.05.2018 um 19:30 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi:
> What would it take to have user services managed in a similar way as
> system services? Should I look into implementing that in
> init-system-helpers or should a new dh helper be created?
It would need changes to both init-system-helpers and deb
Hello Michael,
On 29/05/2018 09:30, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I had a short look at the package
Thank you very much.
> a/ a hard dep on systemd-sysv. Is dbus-broker strictly systemd-only? The
> launcher part probably is, but the messaging part should be init system
> agnostic? Would it be possible
Am 17.05.2018 um 22:15 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm still looking for a sponsor for this package. Would anyone have a
> bit of spare time to look at it and let me know how it can be made fit
> for upload?
>
> Is there any specific reason why this package is harder to review than
Hello all,
I'm still looking for a sponsor for this package. Would anyone have a
bit of spare time to look at it and let me know how it can be made fit
for upload?
Is there any specific reason why this package is harder to review than
others? It is a bit discouraging not having received any feedb