On Monday, February 8, 2016 1:21:01 PM CET Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's almost time to make the plasma mobile components a framework/repository
> by itself, and with that I'm wondering of "plasma mobile components" it's
> even the proper name after all.
>
> Following the Qt naming
Hi all,
It's almost time to make the plasma mobile components a framework/repository
by itself, and with that I'm wondering of "plasma mobile components" it's even
the proper name after all.
Following the Qt naming conventions i was going for "Plasma Controls" where
"Plasma" is there purely
On Monday, February 8, 2016 4:07:35 PM CET Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 08 February 2016, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > Plasma is the brand for the "Desktop Shell". Why use Plasma as the name
> > for
> > the components, then? Isn't that going to be confusing for devs. Like the
> > assumption that
On Monday 08 February 2016, Martin Graesslin wrote:
>
> Plasma is the brand for the "Desktop Shell". Why use Plasma as the name for
> the components, then? Isn't that going to be confusing for devs. Like the
> assumption that you need Plasma or it's only for Plasma? Kind of
> introducing the same
