---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129091/
---
(Updated 十月 6, 2016, 6:03 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129091/
---
(Updated 十月 6, 2016, 6:02 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
> On 十月 4, 2016, 3:56 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Instead of using fcitx-, would it be possible to make generic icons per
> > language code so they can also be used by kimpanel (which in turn can use
> > fcitx or ibus or scim)? Do you really need different icons for each IME
> > engine instead
> On 十月 4, 2016, 3:56 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Instead of using fcitx-, would it be possible to make generic icons per
> > language code so they can also be used by kimpanel (which in turn can use
> > fcitx or ibus or scim)? Do you really need different icons for each IME
> > engine instead
> On 十月 4, 2016, 3:56 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Instead of using fcitx-, would it be possible to make generic icons per
> > language code so they can also be used by kimpanel (which in turn can use
> > fcitx or ibus or scim)? Do you really need different icons for each IME
> > engine instead
> On Oct. 4, 2016, 3:56 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Instead of using fcitx-, would it be possible to make generic icons per
> > language code so they can also be used by kimpanel (which in turn can use
> > fcitx or ibus or scim)? Do you really need different icons for each IME
> > engine instea
> On Oct. 4, 2016, 3:56 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Instead of using fcitx-, would it be possible to make generic icons per
> > language code so they can also be used by kimpanel (which in turn can use
> > fcitx or ibus or scim)? Do you really need different icons for each IME
> > engine instea
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129091/
---
(Updated 十月 4, 2016, 4:38 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
> On Oct. 4, 2016, 3:56 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Instead of using fcitx-, would it be possible to make generic icons per
> > language code so they can also be used by kimpanel (which in turn can use
> > fcitx or ibus or scim)? Do you really need different icons for each IME
> > engine instea
> On 十月 4, 2016, 3:56 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Instead of using fcitx-, would it be possible to make generic icons per
> > language code so they can also be used by kimpanel (which in turn can use
> > fcitx or ibus or scim)? Do you really need different icons for each IME
> > engine instead
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129091/#review99774
---
Instead of using fcitx-, would it be possible to make generic
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129091/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-framework
Description
---
12 matches
Mail list logo