Re: %_usrlibrpm macro gone

2022-09-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:08 PM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > rpm-4.17.1.1-1.x86_64 > > dokuwiki* packages don’t build due that: > > ``` > > + %{_usrlibrpm}/dokuwiki-find-lang.sh > /home/users/glen/tmp/dokuwiki-20180422c-x86_64-root-glen dokuwiki.lang > /home/users/glen/tmp/rpm-tmp.oRtxaL[82]:

Re: Qt packaging

2022-08-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 2:32 AM Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Jan Palus wrote: > > > On 22.07.2022 11:03, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > Can someone explain why are we using split sources/packages for Qt? > > > > > > I want to add Qt6 and building from the monolythic source is s

Re: systemd vs split /usr

2021-09-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:37 PM Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > meson.build from systemd 249 says: > "split-usr mode is going to be removed" > (and sysusers.d location is already broken/inconsistent in this version, > I'm going to patch it) > > Any plans related to this? > Nobody is maintaining split

Re: rpm: --nofsync: unknown option

2021-09-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 7:32 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > is there equivalent for rpm 4.16? > > > in virtualized environments, like docker build, there's no point calling > fsync after each package installation. > No, it was explicitly removed a long time ago[1], though there are knobs to

Re: Empty %files file

2021-08-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:59 AM Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:30:43AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:19 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > > > > > > error: Empty %files file > > > /home/users/g

Re: Empty %files file

2021-08-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:19 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > error: Empty %files file > /home/users/glen/rpm/packages/BUILD.x86_64-linux/zabbix-5.4.3/debugsourcefiles.list > > is this something specific to carme? > > > and how to prevent the error and proceed? > That happens when your compilation

Re: rpm 4.16 /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Requirename

2021-08-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 9:11 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > Does rpm 4.16 have equivalent of /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Requirename? > > it's used to prevent some package being uninstalled: > > - > http://git.pld-linux.org/?p=packages/pld-builder.git;a=commitdiff;h=d37d3a926108b86a52d91a4c78f3bfb647b7b6a2 >

Re: [packages/php] - drop if clause introduced in commit 20dcadbb (guard clause for rpm 4.16), we have fully transiti

2021-05-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 12:08 PM Jan Palus wrote: > > On 15.05.2021 11:44, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 10:41 AM Adam Gołębiowski > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > W dniu 2021-05-15 o 15:26, Neal Gompa pisze: > > > > On Sat,

Re: [packages/php] - drop if clause introduced in commit 20dcadbb (guard clause for rpm 4.16), we have fully transiti

2021-05-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 10:41 AM Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > > W dniu 2021-05-15 o 15:26, Neal Gompa pisze: > > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 6:23 AM Adam Gołębiowski > > wrote: > >> > >> W dniu 2021-05-15 o 11:52, Neal Gompa pisze: > >>> On Sat, May

Re: [packages/php] - drop if clause introduced in commit 20dcadbb (guard clause for rpm 4.16), we have fully transiti

2021-05-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 6:23 AM Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > > W dniu 2021-05-15 o 11:52, Neal Gompa pisze: > > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 5:38 AM Adam Gołębiowski > > wrote: > >> > >> W dniu 2021-05-13 o 21:32, Elan Ruusamäe pisze: > >> > >&g

Re: [packages/php] - drop if clause introduced in commit 20dcadbb (guard clause for rpm 4.16), we have fully transiti

2021-05-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 5:38 AM Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > > W dniu 2021-05-13 o 21:32, Elan Ruusamäe pisze: > > > point of that guard was to wait for support to become available or > > someone implement a solution. > > (...) > > but as no such solution as provided, you need to update obsoletes

Re: rpm.org/rpm5.org test

2021-04-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 8:51 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > ``` > > rpm -E '%{?_rpmconfigdir:rpm.org}%{?_rpmhome:rpm5.org}' > > ``` > > this is perhaps more reliable than comparing --version output. > Is there a reason to do such a test anymore? PLD Th is on rpm.org rpm and there are no supported

Re: [projects/template-specs] use %cargo_* macros

2021-03-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:34 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On 30.03.2021 21:57, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:46:46PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > [...] > > When it comes to crates, It'd better to find some generic solution for > > packaging creates system-wide instead of

Re: package names in dependencies

2021-03-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:27 PM Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:18:36PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:39 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 23.03.2021 12:59, Neal Gompa wrote: > > >

Re: package names in dependencies

2021-03-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:39 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > On 23.03.2021 12:59, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:04 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > >> i found some odd inconsistency: > >> > >> > >> error: line 319: Illegal char

Re: package names in dependencies

2021-03-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:04 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > i found some odd inconsistency: > > > error: line 319: Illegal char ')' (0x29) in: Obsoletes: virtual(init-daemon) > error: line 319: Only package names are allowed in Obsoletes: > Obsoletes:virtual(init-daemon) > > > So:

Re: rpm 4.16 landed -> errors!

2021-03-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 5:44 PM Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 2:48 PM Jan Rękorajski > > wrote: > > > > > > Neal, > > > > > > Do you have any references to such issue

Re: rpm 4.16 landed -> errors!

2021-03-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 2:48 PM Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:39 PM Jan Rękorajski > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > >

Re: rpm 4.16 landed -> errors!

2021-03-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:39 PM Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > > On 16.03.2021 16:45, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > > > the automatic upgrade is failing: > > > > > > - https://gitlab.com/pld-linux/pld/-/jobs/1094531330#L214 > > > > > oh, and user is

Re: rpm 4.16.1.2 from rpm.org has landed in Th

2021-02-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 2:00 PM Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > rpm 4.16.1.2 and all dependant packages are now available in th-test. > > More details about the update can be found on > > https://www.pld-linux.org/packages/rpm > > Th builders has been upgraded and all builds will now use rpm.org rpm. >

Re: [PLDWWW] page changed: packages:rpm

2021-02-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 1:23 PM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > On 06.02.2021 11:13, "Jan Rękorajski (baggins)" wrote: > > + * rpm.org rpm generates ''rpmlib(ShortCircuited)'' dependencies when > > package is build using ''--short-circuit'' option. To disable that add > >

Re: rpm.org 4.16.x is coming to Th

2021-01-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 4:16 AM Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:09 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11.01.2021 10:38, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > > If you thin

Re: AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering (was Re: rpm.org 4.16.x is coming to Th)

2021-01-11 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:34 PM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > On 11.01.2021 17:10, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:09 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2021 10:38, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > >>> If you think there is still

Re: rpm.org 4.16.x is coming to Th

2021-01-11 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:09 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > On 11.01.2021 10:38, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > If you think there is still something that is blocking the change please > > speak*now*. > > are these pld introduced noauto* macros and files supported in 4.16 build? > > > %define

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jan Palus wrote: > > If commit message includes '%' then rpmbuild spawned by builder script > fails. See ie test.spec which includes '%prep': > > error: line 40: second %prep > > builder creates spec copy with %changelog appended. Apparently rpm.org > evaluates

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:34 AM Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en wrote: > > W dniu 22.11.2020 o 17:00, Jan Palus pisze: > > * adding to the list of invalid chars in Obsoletes: '/' (msmtp: Obsoletes: > > /usr/lib/sendmail) > > > > * python-Cython built with rpm.org has weird

Re: rpm.org's rpm 4.16.0 ready for testing

2020-10-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 5:37 PM Jan Palus wrote: > > On 24.10.2020 17:15, Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: > > I have prepared rpm 4.16, poldek and support packages, they are > > available on http://ftp1.pld-linux.org/people/baggins/rpm.org/ > > > > I would appreciate if you could test the

Re: rpm.org's rpm 4.16.0 ready for testing

2020-10-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:27 PM Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Oct 2020, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:16 AM Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en > > wrote: > > > > > > I have prepared rpm 4.16, poldek and support pac

Re: rpm.org's rpm 4.16.0 ready for testing

2020-10-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:17 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:16 AM Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en > wrote: > > > > I have prepared rpm 4.16, poldek and support packages, they are > > available on http://ftp1.pld-linux.org/people/baggins/rpm.org/

Re: rpm.org's rpm 4.16.0 ready for testing

2020-10-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:16 AM Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: > > I have prepared rpm 4.16, poldek and support packages, they are > available on http://ftp1.pld-linux.org/people/baggins/rpm.org/ > > I would appreciate if you could test the uprade path, functionality > and tell me if

Re: rpm plan (Re: rpm-build pulls perl)

2020-03-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:14 AM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On 3/29/20 11:52 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > >> i think the pear dependency generator should be disabled by default, > >> pear is considered dead in php world. > > ` > > Then disable it, or even better, delete the scripts and config. >

Re: ninja macros

2018-10-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 2:43 PM Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > why is invoking ninja hidden behind these macros? > > > %build > %meson build > %meson_build -C build > > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > %meson_install -C build > > > i.e %meson_build and %meson_install expand to ninja, just have %ninja

Re: libexec and multi-arch

2018-02-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > >> On Feb 5, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Tomasz Pala wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:47:32 +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: >>> >>> Using lib/lib64/libx32 instead of libexec was much smarter in this case. >> >>

Re: [packages/openssl] use the generic ca-bundle path instead of PLD-specific ca-certificates one

2017-12-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 03.12.2017 16:27, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: >> >> On Sunday 03 of December 2017, gotar wrote: >>> >>> commit 618e7076669ee7a48416373d5da4369647c57246 >>> Author: Tomasz Pala >>> Date: Sun Dec 3

Re: Re: [Nurmukhamed/centos-7-build-asterisk-rpms] License missing (#2)

2017-08-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > Hi, > > I got such question from a GitGHub user: what is the license of our spec > files and patches – the asterisk package in particular. > > I am pretty sure it was GNU GPL, but I cannot find any confirmation. > > So,