On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:41:28PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
Mariusz Mazur wrote:
Dnia poniedziałek, 18 czerwca 2007, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisał:
OO. For all the minimum requirements there's always vim-static and e3.
-static is in contradiction with minimum.
Elan Ruusamäe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [18-06-2007 08:45]:
[...]
vim needs just perl-libs (at least on AC) --
$ rpm -q --qf '%-12{NAME}: %{SIZE}\n' perl-libs
perl-libs : 1146552
What's that? Why has it been separated?
1. Is there a considerable amount of applications it's enough for?
2. Is there
On Monday 18 June 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Elan Ruusamäe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [18-06-2007 08:45]:
[...]
vim needs just perl-libs (at least on AC) --
$ rpm -q --qf '%-12{NAME}: %{SIZE}\n' perl-libs
perl-libs : 1146552
What's that? Why has it been separated?
to make vim deps
Dnia 17-06-2007, N o godzinie 22:02 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
But the original question was: do particular language support overhead is
worth its benefits?
Are there already some packaged or custom vim addons which need all these
languages?
1. I use vim to develop python code and the
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:45:52AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
the language bindings should be dynamic -- loaded at runtime if needed that
would be sane solution :)
So there should be packages having only libs required by vim to start
(ldd =vim, and I mean only libs with no other bloat) -
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Cezary Krzyzanowski wrote:
3. PLD is doing the maximum functionality maximum deps packages. Think
Unless the dependencies are small, are almost always used by sth. else in
the system, or provide functionality required by most of users. Not this
case.
OO. For all the
Dnia poniedziałek, 18 czerwca 2007, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisał:
OO. For all the minimum requirements there's always vim-static and e3.
-static is in contradiction with minimum.
Yup. We should have full vim with everything (X, python, perl, ruby,
brainfuck, you name it) and a vim-minimal
Mariusz Mazur wrote:
Dnia poniedziałek, 18 czerwca 2007, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisał:
OO. For all the minimum requirements there's always vim-static and e3.
-static is in contradiction with minimum.
Yup. We should have full vim with everything (X, python, perl, ruby,
brainfuck,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:20:07PM +0200, czarny wrote:
Author: czarny Date: Tue Jun 5 15:20:07 2007 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- with python, ruby and tcl by default
IIRC this makes vim binary depend on python, ruby and tcl
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 05:41:19PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:20:07PM +0200, czarny wrote:
Author: czarny Date: Tue Jun 5 15:20:07 2007 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- with python, ruby and tcl by
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:45:54PM +0200, Cezary Krzyzanowski wrote:
Dnia 17-06-2007, N o godzinie 17:55 +0100, wrobell napisał(a):
imho it should be off by default. if one wants fat vim, then please create
vim-enahnced/vim-fat/whatever packages.
1. What is fat? perl is fat for me,
11 matches
Mail list logo
