So what are exact rules at the moment?
What if someone wants to create another branch of distro?
I'd like to know that too. When I've created Titanium I was keeping
separate branches on some specs. That was baad, because I wasn't merging
my changes/updates to HEAD. So I started using %if
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Marcin Krol h...@limanowa.net wrote:
So what are exact rules at the moment?
What if someone wants to create another branch of distro?
I'd like to know that too. When I've created Titanium I was keeping
separate branches on some specs. That was baad, because I
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:02:07 +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
my changes/updates to HEAD. So I started using %if %{pld_release}
macros instead and keeping my changes on HEAD. For over two years no one
had problems with that.
I have a problem - assume I want to rebuild some package in Ti-way.
Number of specs where %if %{pld_release} macros are used isn't that
big and doesn't make modifying them that hard. I don't ask anyone to
edit/adjust/fix Titanium part of such specs, just forget its there and
focus on Th part.
This is what bconds are for. Their state is the only thing that
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 13:02:07 Marcin Krol wrote:
So I started using %if %{pld_release}
macros instead and keeping my changes on HEAD. For over two years no one
had problems with that.
and there are no problems if the spec stays processible after that, it was
reminder that it's maybe
I'd like to know that too. When I've created Titanium I was keeping
separate branches on some specs. That was baad, because I wasn't merging
my changes/updates to HEAD.
But that's not our fault, is it? :)
Yes it is. Hawk working on Titanium and not merging his changes because
of -ENOTIME -
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Marcin Krol h...@limanowa.net wrote:
I'd like to know that too. When I've created Titanium I was keeping
separate branches on some specs. That was baad, because I wasn't merging
my changes/updates to HEAD.
But that's not our fault, is it? :)
Yes it is. Hawk
Probably I missed some discussion on irc or pld-devel-pl... but what
is exact purpose of Titanium? Why it started in first place?
There are two main reasons:
1. To have stable distro with actual software. Ac had and has too old
software for me and Th is still light years away from being stable
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:33:58 +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
Seems fine for me, but it will still be trashing HEAD for some people
I'm afraid. The only thing that will change is %if. Instead of
%if %{pld_release} == ti
[...]
we will have
%if %{with titanium}
No, you didn't understand.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Tomasz Pala go...@polanet.pl wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:33:58 +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
Seems fine for me, but it will still be trashing HEAD for some people
I'm afraid. The only thing that will change is %if. Instead of
%if %{pld_release} == ti
[...]
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 14:26:51 +, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
No, you didn't understand. It's not supposed to be '--with titanium' but
'--with alternative_option_for_this_package', just like in iceweasel.
You mean system xulrunner, right?
Yes. And there could be --without FHS for openssl
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 16:12:27 +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
No, you didn't understand. It's not supposed to be '--with titanium' but
'--with alternative_option_for_this_package', just like in iceweasel.
It will look kind of funny... --with var_lib_openssl for openssl.spec? I
If you prefer
BTW any chances on iceweasel 3.6?
Yes. I'm working on Iceweasel, Icedove and Iceape upgrades, but my time
for PLD is limited right now.
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
