Re: sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules

2006-04-17 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Thursday 13 April 2006 10:02, wrobell wrote:
 hello,

 th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about
 such two rules?

 1. if you send something to th builders, then it should
build on all archs. this means that if package building
fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility
to fix this before sending another request.

if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list,
so we can work together to fix the problem.

and the winner is...

4458. 2006.04.16 23:03:17 from cieciwa (...) test-build
qcad-2.0.4.0-2.src.rpm (qcad.spec -R HEAD )
[th-x86_64:FAIL th-athlon:OK th-i486:OK th-i686:OK th-ppc:OK]

4460. 2006.04.16 23:15:39 from cieciwa (...) upgrade
qcad-2.0.4.0-2.src.rpm (qcad.spec -R HEAD )
[th-x86_64:FAIL th-athlon:OK th-i486:OK th-i686:OK th-ppc:OK]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules

2006-04-16 Thread wrobell
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:57:19AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
 On Thursday 13 April 2006 10:02, wrobell wrote:
[...]
 
 
  2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it
 on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then
 it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages.
 
 if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to
 builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs
 you, then ask other developer to finish the job.
 
 if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on
 the list about it.
 There are two packages currently with soname changes. expat and openssl. 
 expat 
 case isn't yet clear and rebuilding stuff for openssl and then again for 
 expat would be stupid. So openssl has to wait. It didn't upgrade on builders 
 so what the problem?

speaking about openssl and th it is not a problem, now. :)

openssl was just an example. if you have your plan then it is ok.
eventually, just let us know what is going to happen.

let's be flexible.

[...]

wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules

2006-04-13 Thread wrobell
hello,

th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about
such two rules?

1. if you send something to th builders, then it should
   build on all archs. this means that if package building
   fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility
   to fix this before sending another request. 

   if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list,
   so we can work together to fix the problem.
   
2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it
   on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then
   it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages.

   if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to
   builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs
   you, then ask other developer to finish the job.

   if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on
   the list about it.


of course, this is only a proposal. i think that such rules could
improve stability of system for testers. then, maybe we could
gain more people to test pld th.

regards,

  wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules

2006-04-13 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
--- wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 hello,

hi,

 th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about
 such two rules?
 
 1. if you send something to th builders, then it should
build on all archs. this means that if package building
fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility
to fix this before sending another request. 
 
if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list,
so we can work together to fix the problem.

 2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it
on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then
it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages.
 
if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to
builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs
you, then ask other developer to finish the job.
 
if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on
the list about it.
 
 
 of course, this is only a proposal. i think that such rules could
 improve stability of system for testers. then, maybe we could
 gain more people to test pld th.

simple and clear rules. Th is not a trash, it's very usable (thx to
pluto's work) and should stay so. So, dear developer, don't forget to
check wrobell's words before sending a builder request.

-- 
Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en