Re: sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules
On Thursday 13 April 2006 10:02, wrobell wrote: hello, th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about such two rules? 1. if you send something to th builders, then it should build on all archs. this means that if package building fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility to fix this before sending another request. if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list, so we can work together to fix the problem. and the winner is... 4458. 2006.04.16 23:03:17 from cieciwa (...) test-build qcad-2.0.4.0-2.src.rpm (qcad.spec -R HEAD ) [th-x86_64:FAIL th-athlon:OK th-i486:OK th-i686:OK th-ppc:OK] 4460. 2006.04.16 23:15:39 from cieciwa (...) upgrade qcad-2.0.4.0-2.src.rpm (qcad.spec -R HEAD ) [th-x86_64:FAIL th-athlon:OK th-i486:OK th-i686:OK th-ppc:OK] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:57:19AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: On Thursday 13 April 2006 10:02, wrobell wrote: [...] 2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages. if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs you, then ask other developer to finish the job. if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on the list about it. There are two packages currently with soname changes. expat and openssl. expat case isn't yet clear and rebuilding stuff for openssl and then again for expat would be stupid. So openssl has to wait. It didn't upgrade on builders so what the problem? speaking about openssl and th it is not a problem, now. :) openssl was just an example. if you have your plan then it is ok. eventually, just let us know what is going to happen. let's be flexible. [...] wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules
hello, th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about such two rules? 1. if you send something to th builders, then it should build on all archs. this means that if package building fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility to fix this before sending another request. if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list, so we can work together to fix the problem. 2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages. if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs you, then ask other developer to finish the job. if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on the list about it. of course, this is only a proposal. i think that such rules could improve stability of system for testers. then, maybe we could gain more people to test pld th. regards, wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules
--- wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, hi, th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about such two rules? 1. if you send something to th builders, then it should build on all archs. this means that if package building fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility to fix this before sending another request. if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list, so we can work together to fix the problem. 2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages. if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs you, then ask other developer to finish the job. if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on the list about it. of course, this is only a proposal. i think that such rules could improve stability of system for testers. then, maybe we could gain more people to test pld th. simple and clear rules. Th is not a trash, it's very usable (thx to pluto's work) and should stay so. So, dear developer, don't forget to check wrobell's words before sending a builder request. -- Fryderyk Dziarmagowski ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en