The check_buildarch does not work correctly when the builder is called
with the --define argument. Best solution that I could find is in the
attachment.
Best wishes,
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http
There is a new version of mutt which fixes CVE-2007-2683 and
CVE-2007-1558. I enclose patch for the AC-branch.
Best wishes,
--
Kacper Kornet
Index: mutt.spec
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/SPECS/mutt.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.183.2.1
I enclose the path with the upgrade of gimp. The new version corrects
CVE-2007-2356.
P.S. Building new gimp I discovered that pango-devel probably misses
requirement for glitz-devel.
--
Kacper Kornet
Index: gimp.spec
===
RCS
autoconf-2.61-1 from ac-updates produces an error when
macro AM_GNU_GETTEXT([external]) is used. I think there are two
solutions:
a) push autoconf from HEAD to Ac
b) push m4=1.4.5 to AC
Best wishes,
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
Author: adamgDate: Wed Jun 25 08:46:32 2008 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- pass --install to libtoolize (fixes build)
- release 2
In this case shouldn't the BuildRequires: libtool = 2:1.5 be changed to
require version = 1.9b?
} \
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE:BOOL=TRUE \
}
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 05:40:30PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:35:39PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:54:25AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2008 07:45, qboosh wrote
Are there any objections against adding R: vim-rt-extras to gvim-gtk?
Without vim-rt-extras installed I get warning:
Error detected while processing /usr/share/vim/vim72/menu.vim:
line 155:
E121: Undefined variable: paste#paste_cmd
E15: Invalid expression: 'vnoremenu script Edit.PasteTab+gP^I' .
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:22:12PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
The firmware helper is broken and does not load any firmware the
kernel requests.
Downgrading to 151 immediately fixes the problem (which seems to point
to /lib/udev/firmware binary).
There is a typo in configure.ac. See:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:28:55PM +0200, Przemyslaw Iskra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:28:17PM +0200, draenog wrote:
@@ -87,6 +84,8 @@
%{__make} install \
DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+%{__gzip} -9
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/{README,cc-by-sa-3.0.txt}
+rm
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 08:43:33PM +0100, Przemo Firszt wrote:
There is a bug that causes SIGSEGV in ufraw-0.17 when used with
lensfun-0.2.5. Turning off vectorisation in lensfun is a known
workaround for this bug. See attached patch.
Could you check lensfun-0.2.5-2 from our CVS? I have just
Która z bibliotek dostarczających wxWidgets jest zalecana do linkowania
z dystrybucyjnym pakietem? Z tego co widzę mam do wyboru: wxGTK2,
wxGTK2-unicode, wxX11 i wxX11-unicode.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
. But first I am waiting for any objections
or better ideas.
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:30:14PM +0100, Przemyslaw Iskra wrote:
rc-scripts-user / userscripts allows normal users to schedule and
execute tasks on system startup and shutdown.
Out of my own curiosity, what do you need it for?
--
Kacper Kornet
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:51:42PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
2. Change the build type we use to None. Then only CMAKE_C_FLAGS will be
used
Flaws:
Same as above. But I don't know if any package redefines that variable
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:22:58PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:55:48PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:51:42PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
[...
3. Use or own build type like
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:59:26PM +0100, Przemyslaw Iskra wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:45:38PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
So the question is whether assert should have no effect only in cmake
based packages or in all programs.
Problem is that not everyone knows how to use assert
What is the reason that GIT_ variables are copied by ssh to remote
session? I mean the following line in our default /etc/ssh/ssh_config.
AcceptEnv LANG LC_* LANGUAGE TZ GIT_*
I have just discovered that it break at least one feature in gitolite.
--
Kacper
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:11:37AM +0200, Marcin Rybak wrote:
2011/5/3 Kacper Kornet kor...@camk.edu.pl
What is the reason that GIT_ variables are copied by ssh to remote
session? I mean the following line in our default /etc/ssh/ssh_config.
AcceptEnv LANG LC_* LANGUAGE TZ GIT_*
I have
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:37:16AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 03 of May 2011, Kacper Kornet wrote:
What is the reason that GIT_ variables are copied by ssh to remote
session? I mean the following line in our default /etc/ssh/ssh_config.
AcceptEnv LANG LC_* LANGUAGE TZ
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Wednesday 04 of May 2011, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:37:16AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 03 of May 2011, Kacper Kornet wrote:
What is the reason that GIT_ variables are copied
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Wednesday 04 of May 2011, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:37:16AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 03 of May 2011, Kacper Kornet wrote:
What is the reason that GIT_ variables are copied
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:25:07PM +0200, Artur Frysiak wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 15:18, Kacper Kornet kor...@camk.edu.pl wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Wednesday 04 of May 2011, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:37:16AM
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:51:18PM +0200, Artur Frysiak wrote:
2011/5/4 Kacper Kornet kor...@camk.edu.pl:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:25:07PM +0200, Artur Frysiak wrote:
Kacper, can you provide more information? Which GIT_* variable is a
problem for gitolite?
It is GIT_DIR. The problem
ERROR: A CVS repository cannot contain both
packages/php-pecl-idn/php-pecl-idn.spec,v and
packages/php-pecl-idn/Attic/php-pecl-idn.spec,v
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org
if [ $resume = yes ]; then
should also be changed.
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
+ git submodules?
What do you want to use submodules for?
I can't see anything in the pld-linux-polish/english archive - please let
me knwo if I missed something.
There were some mails sent to pld-discuss.
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing
-builder
9. Update distfiles to version from branch git in cvs.pld-linux.org
10. Update packages which were changed in CVS between point 2. and 7.
11. Switch on RW access to git.pld-linux.org for all developers
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 08:04:27PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 03 of April 2012, Kacper Kornet wrote:
Is cvsadmin job for git described anywhere?
http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/admin.html
But I will prepare small description on our wiki.
How I (as user) can change my
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 08:32:43PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Tuesday 03 of April 2012 19:34:10 Kacper Kornet wrote:
So there are following questions:
B. Is there anything more that should be done before D day?
do we need an extra 'Changed files:' section in git changelog?
It is only
of the message up to the first blank line.
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
as an author
of your changes in git repositories and to other purposes that use data
from these repositories.
--
Kacper Kornet
--
Kacper Kornet
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman
(Polska wersja w drugiej częście wiadomości:)
In git repositories authentication will be based on ssh keys. Therefore I
would like to ask developers with RW access to CVS to upload their public ssh
keys to SSH-keys directory in CVS. If you upload a new key, I would prefer if
you put it in a file
I have forgotten about one think. Please make sure that one file with
contains only one key. If you want to use few keys, you should keep them
in separate files.
Polish translation:
Jeszcze jedna uwaga. Każdy plik powinien zawierać dokładnie jeden klucz.
Jeżeli ktoś się chce posługiwać kilkoma
There are two suggestions about auto-tags-
1. Move auto- tags to dir like substructure. So the tag
auto-th-gcc-4_3_2-4 would be renamed auto/th/gcc-4_3_2-4
2. Drop the replacement '.@ - '_#' during generation of auto tags.
This one would go for only new tags.
Any objections, comments?
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:43:17AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:36:56AM +0200, draenog wrote:
Files affected:
packages/git-core-slug:
git-core-slug.spec (1.18 - 1.19)
Why is this package called 'git-core-slug'? It is not in any way part of
the GIT
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:04:39AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
Someone on IRC suggested that name. I think it was a compromise between
slug, and git-core-pld. The connection with git is that instead of
calling command slug.py
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 08:54:20PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Friday 22 of June 2012 21:47:08 Kacper Kornet wrote:
(Polska wersja w drugiej częście wiadomości:)
In git repositories authentication will be based on ssh keys. Therefore I
would like to ask developers with RW access to CVS
I'm sorry but this time only English version.
The beta version of git setup is in place. Basic informations:
1. Access: git://git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG
ssh://g...@git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG
You can try to fetch packages and upload your changes. Don't be afraid
to break
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:27:53PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 18:39:56 Kacper Kornet wrote:
I'm sorry but this time only English version.
The beta version of git setup is in place. Basic informations:
1. Access: git://git.pld-linux.org/packages/PKG
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:28:07PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 18:39:56 Kacper Kornet wrote:
Any bug reports, comments etc. more then welcome.
1). do we really need two notifications for single event?
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:03:45PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 20:51:24 Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:28:07PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 18:39:56 Kacper Kornet wrote:
Any bug reports, comments etc. more
Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled in
around 45 minutes.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled in
around 45 minutes.
So the official repositories of PLD packages are now in git:
git://git.pld-linux.org/packages/*
ssh://g...@pld-linux.org/packages
* Servers
-
Anonymous access
git://git.pld-linux.org
Developers have an rw acces by ssh:
ssh://g...@git.pld-linux.org
Note: Every developer should use the same account: git
* Builder script
Version which can work with git repositories you can find in packet
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:16:17AM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled in
around 45 minutes.
So the official
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Adam Golebiowski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:09:04AM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
* Servers
-
Anonymous access
git://git.pld-linux.org
Developers have an rw acces by ssh:
ssh://g...@git.pld-linux.org
is there away
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:21:29PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 09.07.2012 08:49, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
There were some scripts and other files directly under packages/ :
adapter
adapter.awk
bconds.txt
builder
check-unused-files.py
ci
civim
clean-distfiles.sh
compile.sh
COPYING
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Is there any way to change mistaken changelog entry after push?
If you ask about changelog generated during build process and included
in rpm, then yes. If the commit is annotated with git-notes in name
space refs/notes/commits, then
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0200, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2012/7/9 Kacper Kornet drae...@pld-linux.org:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled in
around 45 minutes.
So the official
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:21:02PM +0200, qboosh wrote:
The branch 'master' was created pointing to:
391e234... - new
Two remarks:
1) In case of new specs their content should be included in mail.
I think it is a safeguard
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:26:19PM +0200, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2012/7/9 kiesiu kie...@pld-linux.org:
Author: kiesiu Date: Mon Jul 9 19:18:52 2012 GMT
Module: pld-builder.new Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- change links from cvsweb to gitweb
- remove some
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:48:54PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 07/09/2012 10:26 PM, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2. https://github.com/pld-linux/rpm-build-tools is same as
git.pld/packages/rpm-build-tools due the above
3. https://github.com/pld-linux/pld-builder.new - moved to
pld-devel-pl
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Git HOWTO: change branch name
Reply-To:
A remark which just came to my mind.
If for any reason you decide to change the name of exported branch, you
should do this in this order:
git branch -m oldname newname
git push origin newname
git push --delete origin
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:05:40PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:55:35PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Is there any way to change mistaken changelog entry after push?
If you ask about changelog generated
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:48:58AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:14:05AM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
Having the project in github may give us a lot of publicity. And github
gives great
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:26:00PM +0300, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
2) Is there a way to set git's user.email config variable without
doing it globally? I use git for other things where my pld nick is not
my email. However with each package being a separate repository,
setting it in the
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:04:01PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:40:58PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:26:00PM +0300, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
2) Is there a way to set git's user.email config variable without
doing it globally? I use git
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:06:57PM +0300, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
2012/7/10 Mariusz Mazur mma...@kernel.pl:
Or one can alias the 'git' command to a simple script that checks for
.git/config, check if remote origin is git.pld-linux.org and if so, uses a
different user.email.
Hm, I could
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:17:53PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:20:52PM +, PLD th-src builder wrote:
sblim-cmpi-base.spec (auto/th/sblim-cmpi-base-1.6.1-1): FAILED
--- sblim-cmpi-base.spec:auto/th/sblim-cmpi-base-1.6.1-1:
Build-Time: user:2.17s sys:0.89s
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:31:22PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
When we were using CVS it was possible to resend tagged package to builders
using package:auto-th-... syntax.
Something changed or some builder functions were not updated for
auto/th/ prefix?
Following change is needed to get it
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:19:39PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
Hawk has given the solution to the problem. But my question is the
purpose of resending the build from the same tag? I'm assume that it
would a test build, as the ready one would fail due to preexisting tag.
No. Ready build with
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:25:45PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
I have the same fix, but I have not pushed it as I am not 100%
happy with it. It changes the send request send with path/spec:tag
Can you explain? I pretty you mean something different than what I'm
thinking about.
My assumption is
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:59:30PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
Better, but still not the same as previously.
Thats make-request.sh thing and has nothing to do with change we are
talking about right now (added -cf to builder script call to allow
ready builds with auto tags to succeed).
I'm
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:16:59PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:54:11PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
What do you mean by shouldn't fell. Script builder will fail if you run
like: builder -bs -Tp auto/th/ -tt .
and the auto tag generated from required revision
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:17:27PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 09.07.2012 15:40, Kacper Kornet wrote:
those (except pldnotify.awk and pearize.sh) are daily tools used to
manage pld packages developing
do they all fit to rpm-build-tools git repo? can those be imported
with full cvs
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:09:26PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:03:44PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
A small doubt about it. Package rpm-build-tools is cloned to chroots
used by builders. Are all this tools really needed there?
If they do not pull further
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:08:40PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 11.07.2012 16:03, Kacper Kornet wrote:
A small doubt about it. Package rpm-build-tools is cloned to
chroots used by builders. Are all this tools really needed there?
in src-builders probably (two setups both on ep09
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:21:46PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:08:40PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 11.07.2012 16:03, Kacper Kornet wrote:
A small doubt about it. Package rpm-build-tools is cloned to
chroots used by builders. Are all this tools really needed
in the temporary spec file and indeed:
%changelog
* Wed Jul 11 2012 Kacper Kornet drae...@pld-linux.org c9933bf
Add help message explaining how to push branch for the first time
[...]
* Wed Jul 11 2012 Kacper Kornet drae...@pld-linux.org ace99bc
Check for existence of tag during tagging
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:16:02PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Kacper Kornet drae...@pld-linux.org wrote:
That can be because 'git rev-list', used to generate the changelog,
returns
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 03:47:41PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Jul 16, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Kacper Kornet drae...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:16:02PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 2
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:54:40AM +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
But that would be not 'totally unordered'.
GIT history is just not linear
It's the different history: take %changelog as NEWS
and commit messages as CHANGELOG.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:40:51PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
there's still no place for template-specs in git
pls import it to git, or whatever is their place, so changes to git
based vcs to them can be committed
I've just put them to projects/template-specs.git.
--
Kacper
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:17:57PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:56:33PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:40:51PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
there's still no place for template-specs in git
pls import it to git, or whatever is their place
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:22:16PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Hi,
What is the current procedure for renaming packages in git?
Both cases: when the package already has some auto/ tags and when it
does not.
Every developer can do:
ssh g...@git.pld-linux.org move oldname newname
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:02:43PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
How to remove repository?
Write to gitadmin or to the list.
BTW. The HOWTO claims that ~/rpm/packages/builder
shall be used to build a package, but this one tries to fetch
spec files from CVS actually.
Are you sure your
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:29:50PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Lord Blick lordbl...@gmail.com wrote:
In reply on message at 30.07.2012 20:02, from Artur Wroblewski:
Hi,
How to remove repository?
http://www.pld-linux.org/dokuwiki/cvs2git
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:42:23PM +0200, g...@camk.edu.pl wrote:
I was asked to move rpm-macro.sh together with its history from
rpm-build-macros to rpm-build-tools. But first I prefer to ask if
there are any objections to it.
I'm sorry for this email. It was written by me not glen. Glen is
For some time source builders will be down for small fixes.
They should be back in less then 0.5 h.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:55:09AM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
For some time source builders will be down for small fixes.
They should be back in less then 0.5 h.
And they are back.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 05:50:00PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
comments on this?
if no comments, i'll merge it to master
I would say that 7 minutes between sending this email and doing merge is
a little too small amount of time left for comments.
extra bonus part from this, the %changelog
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:37:23PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 17.08.2012 18:20, Kacper Kornet wrote:
glen@carme-pld packages/php $ LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 rpm -qp
/home/users/glen/rpm/SRPMS/php54-5.4.5-0.15.src.rpm --changelog
|head
* Fri Aug 17 2012 PLD Linux Teamfeedb...@pld-linux.org
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:33:30AM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
I think it would nice to have some httpd rewrite rules to easily access
individual package files from git master (at least .spec), like it was
possible with CVS (SPECS/PACKAGE.spec or packages/PACKAGE/PACKAGE.spec).
Now one has to
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:47:29PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:46:00PM +0200, draenog wrote:
commit 6de214b3617a11527162fa443ecca342f52cb035
Author: Kacper Kornet drae...@pld-linux.org
Date: Thu Aug 16 14:44:01 2012 +0200
updated to 2.8.9
Why on branch
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
What is the procedure to rename already existing (also on ftp) package
after moving to git?
cvs2git howto says ssh git@...
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:10:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Friday 05 of October 2012 16:05:16 Kacper Kornet wrote:
Recently one email to pld-cvs was blocked due to large size of generated
diff. The offending file was gcc-branch.diff from crossmingw64-gcc
which is 11M.
Does
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:21:03AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 09/10/12 04:52, Kacper Kornet wrote:
In my opinion a better idea is to keep in a package a script that
generates the compressed patch,pushes it to dropin and updates
# Patch-md5:
go on with this, and block huge patches from now
Description to vim-rt says:
This package contains macros, documentation, syntax configuration and
manual pages for Vim. If you want to take advantage of Vim more
powerful features, you should install this package.
But I've been just surprised that it is actually required by vim? Does
someone
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 02:31:10PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
When creating new repo:
$ slug.py init postgresql-module-pldebugger
Enter passphrase for key '/home/comp/.ssh/id_rsa':
Initialized empty Git repository in
/cvs/root/gitolite/repositories/packages/postgresql-module-pldebugger.git/
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:15:27PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 02:31:10PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
When creating new repo:
$ slug.py init postgresql-module-pldebugger
Enter passphrase for key '/home/comp/.ssh/id_rsa':
Initialized empty Git repository in
/cvs
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:35:09AM +0100, Daniel Dawid Majewski al. LordBlick
wrote:
@@ -105,9 +107,6 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%dir %{_datadir}/mixxx/translations
%{_datadir}/mixxx/skins/cross.*
%doc %{_datadir}/mixxx/skins/*.xsl
-# This is the default skin
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:15:04PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Is there a way to just copy a repo (without setting the old one r/o)?
It can be done by creating a new repository and pushing to it. The only
thing which cannot
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:06:12AM +0100, glen wrote:
commit b012dc654b555d36b557416b2d78f3a98e5c22b9
Author: Elan Ruusamäe g...@delfi.ee
Date: Tue Mar 5 01:05:40 2013 +0200
validate that man links point to something resolveable
for now, links to outside current package are not
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:55:35PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:40:43PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:06:12AM +0100, glen wrote:
commit b012dc654b555d36b557416b2d78f3a98e5c22b9
Author: Elan Ruusamäe g...@delfi.ee
Date: Tue Mar 5 01:05
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:08:56PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:55:35PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:40:43PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:06:12AM +0100, glen wrote:
commit
There is a new way to send requests to Th builders. Every developer can
send a test build with command:
ssh g...@git.pld-linux.org stbr package
Developers who have such priviliges can also send ready builds (the ones
which go to Th-test):
ssh g...@git.pld-linux.org stbr -r package
More
I have just encountered an rpm behaviour which is counter intuitive for
me. Let's say that I have a package with one directory and a file in it:
$ rpm -ql test-pkg
/tmp/dir
/tmp/dir/a
Then I remove the dir directory and in its place I create a symbolic
link to another directory:
$ mkdir
It looks like dhcpcd-6.0.2-1 from th-main has a problem with sending the
correct hostname to the server. It is fixed in dhcpcd-6.0.5-1 from th-test.
--
Kacper
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
