On Aug 8, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Werner Smekal wrote:
> Hi Arjen,
>
>>>
>>> While I like the API simplification this could provide, I have two
>>> primary concerns:
>>>
>>> First, could the first argument - the field to get/set - be an
>>> enumerated type of some sort? This should help catch typos at
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> The latest comparisons between results for various languages and our C
> results are not as clean as they have been in the recent past. Here is the
> summary (as given by both ctest in the build tree and "make
> test_noninteractive" in the installed examples tree).
>
> c++