P.S. I had obviously completely forgotten the thread on this very
subject last January with a subject line of
D language bindings - future directions
but I have found that thread now. The executive summary was we all
more or less agreed it was time to move to D2 (although nothing has
been done s
Hi Werner and Andrew:
Debian testing (my new platform) supports D version 1 only up to gcc
version 4.4, but if you use any more modern tool chain such as
gcc-4.5 or 4.6 all support for version 1 stopped, and they moved
to version 2 of D. From the Wikipedia article on the D
programming language,
On Sep 26, 2012, at 5:47 AM, Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> It is coming up to a year since the last official release of plplot
> (5.9.9). Although it has been a relatively quiet time in terms of
> developments, there are some important bug fixes for newer software
> versions in there. We should think a
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Andrew Ross
wrote:
>
> It is coming up to a year since the last official release of plplot
> (5.9.9). Although it has been a relatively quiet time in terms of
> developments, there are some important bug fixes for newer software
> versions in there. We should think
Sorry for the duplicate message - I didn't use the proper From address
for the mailing list in my previous send.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Alan W. Irwin w=
rote:
> Hi Phil:
>
> On 2012-10-02 14:51-0700 phil rosenberg wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> There have been quite a few options thrown into t
On 2012-10-02 12:23-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Debian wheezy has a huge number of different java choices so I thought
> I should briefly document the particular choices I made which
> lead to the error below.
>
> I installed the gcj-4.7-jdk package which seemed to suck in everything
> else that i
On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 at 16:41:43 (-0700) Alan W. Irwin writes:
> Hi Phil:
>
> On 2012-10-02 14:51-0700 phil rosenberg wrote:
> [snip]
> > 3) Do either 1) or 2) but also provide an interface for loading a standard
> > file format (presumably shapefiles via shapelib?).
> > Al
Hi Phil:
On 2012-10-02 14:51-0700 phil rosenberg wrote:
> Hi All
> I just downloaded shapelib and it builds with no difficulties at all
on Windows. It seems to be written in "pure" C so it is just a case of
compiling and linking the files - no build system is necessary as
such. In less than an h
Hi Andrew:
I have been gradually building up my gcc-4.7 related tool chain for my
new Debian wheezy system, but I have now run into a problem for gnat
(Ada). The issue is the Debian packager for gnat simply decided to
skip packaging of gnat-4.7 (with no public discussion I can find of
why he made
Hi Arjen
Sorry, the phrase "static linkage" clearly has different meanings depending
upon who uses it.
When I refer to static linkage I don't mean creating .lib files rather than
.dll files I mean linking against the static runtime libraries (/MT and /MTd
compiler options or runtime library
Debian wheezy has a huge number of different java choices so I thought
I should briefly document the particular choices I made which
lead to the error below.
I installed the gcj-4.7-jdk package which seemed to suck in everything
else that is needed via the large number of package dependencies for
On 01/10/2012 22:38, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:09:31AM +0200, Davide Cesari wrote:
>>> [...]Hello to everybody,
>>> please note that shapelib is part of the OSGEO4W installation,
>>>
>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/
>>>
>>> which is currently the official and sup
Hi Phil, Alan,
just tested this on Windows, using MS VC/C++ 2008 and GCC (MinGW)
with CMake 2.8.7:
With the option BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF, the build process results
in static libraries (for PLplot, csirocsa and qsastime, the default
libraries that are usually built on my system).
The only dynamic
13 matches
Mail list logo
