Re: [Plplot-devel] Notes on building the wxwidgets software package on MinGW/MSYS

2013-03-15 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2013-03-15 16:35+0100 Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > On 2013-03-14 19:00, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > >> >> One issue that completely surprises me is why in the world do the >> MSVC/ifort set of compilers build the test_plend executable as >> if C++ code (as opposed to plain C code) is involved

Re: [Plplot-devel] Should line width thinner than 1.0 be supported?

2013-03-15 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2013-03-15 05:54-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Alan W. Irwin > wrote: >> @Hez: Because of my plwidth core changes, the OCaml bindings will >> not build any more. More details below. >> >> To others here: use -DENABLE_ocaml=OFF for the svn trunk version >> u

Re: [Plplot-devel] Should line width thinner than 1.0 be supported?

2013-03-15 Thread Hezekiah M. Carty
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Andrew Ross wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:31:42PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote: >> >> Of course, we would still be stuck with integer line widths for the >> pllegend, plshade, and plshades API until we changed those width >> arguments to PLFLT. But making such ch

Re: [Plplot-devel] Notes on building the wxwidgets software package on MinGW/MSYS

2013-03-15 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Alan, On 2013-03-14 19:00, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > One issue that completely surprises me is why in the world do the > MSVC/ifort set of compilers build the test_plend executable as > if C++ code (as opposed to plain C code) is involved? > Well, as we are building a static library the devi

Re: [Plplot-devel] Should line width thinner than 1.0 be supported?

2013-03-15 Thread Hezekiah M. Carty
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > @Hez: Because of my plwidth core changes, the OCaml bindings will > not build any more. More details below. > > To others here: use -DENABLE_ocaml=OFF for the svn trunk version > until further notice. > Thank you for going through most of