Hi Alan
xGCDC is available in 2.8, but looking at 2.9 it seems that it is being slowly
expanded to enable it to wrap other wxDCs. My comments about 2.9 were just
regarding future proofing.
Phil
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013, 1:58, Alan W. Irwin
wrote:
On 2013-10-15 16:41-0700 phil rose
On 2013-10-15 16:41-0700 phil rosenberg wrote:
> After a bit of playing around it seems that wxGCDC uses a similar
trick to some Plplot drivers in that it pretends to have a bigger size
than the bitmap it is drawing on (1x1 units). This means we do
get subpixel accuracy and better than 1 p
After a bit of playing around it seems that wxGCDC uses a similar trick to some
Plplot drivers in that it pretends to have a bigger size than the bitmap it is
drawing on (1x1 units). This means we do get subpixel accuracy and
better than 1 pixel accuracy line widths. However it is up to
If you look at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/plplot/files/plplot/5.9.10%20Source/plplot-5.9.10.tar.gz/stats/map?dates=2013-10-01%20to%202013-10-15
you can see that the tarball downloads are going well since 5.9.10 was
released 15 days ago. The average download rate is ~25 per day, and
the number
I've started this with a new thread title as it had deviated significantly from
the original topic.
Given the suggestion that we streamline the wxWidgets driver I've been looking
into wxGCDC which provides access to wxGraphicsContext but via a wxDC
interface. On my Windows system I can create
On 2013-10-15 06:46- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> ...
>>
>> In sum, there is an issue with our Python results on 32-bit Windows that
>> needs to be
>> confirmed also on 32-bit Linux. All theoretic
