Jim Dishaw wrote:
>Attached is a patch that gets plplot building correctly with the Intel
>Fortran compiler. It still doesn't link correctly because of the
>mismatch in runtime libraries. I'm not enough of a cmake guru to track
>that down. Maybe some can read my previous message about win32
>li
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> Arjen, when you figure this out, please collect all the required
> changes in cmake/modules/Platform/Windows-ifort.cmake. Of course, you
> should also make
> that changed Windows-ifort.cmake file part of a bug report to CMake so
> that
> once your changes are adopted by
On 2007-01-22 08:19+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
> Werner Smekal wrote:
>
>>
>> and so on. Since I don't have access to any fortran compiler in question
>> I would ask Arjen to check these patches and apply them if applicable.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I have not had the opportunity yet, but I will look into this
Werner Smekal wrote:
>
>and so on. Since I don't have access to any fortran compiler in question
>I would ask Arjen to check these patches and apply them if applicable.
>
>
>
>
I have not had the opportunity yet, but I will look into this ASAP.
Regards,
Arjen
---
Hi Jim,
Jim Dishaw wrote:
> Attached is a patch that gets plplot building correctly with the Intel
> Fortran compiler. It still doesn't link correctly because of the
> mismatch in runtime libraries. I'm not enough of a cmake guru to track
> that down. Maybe some can read my previous message abou
Attached is a patch that gets plplot building correctly with the Intel
Fortran compiler. It still doesn't link correctly because of the
mismatch in runtime libraries. I'm not enough of a cmake guru to track
that down. Maybe some can read my previous message about win32
libraries and suggest a fi
